HLL 0.1-TX
Grades, item by item
Every graded answer, every axis, every citation check. Scores are mechanical and recomputable. Public-split items show the blinded facts and the model's full answer; private-split items show scores and notes only. Weights: Standard 2, Authority 2, Outcome 2, Quote fidelity 2. A fabricated citation caps the item at 25%.
watching: refreshes every 30 s|all runsdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash · rawdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash · juiceddeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash · dr2upstage/solar-pro4 · rawupstage/solar-pro4 · dr2openai/gpt-oss-120b · rawopenai/gpt-oss-20b · rawopenai/gpt-oss-120b · dr2openai/gpt-oss-20b · dr2google/gemini-3.7-flash · rawgoogle/gemini-3.7-flash · dr2
administrativeappellate-mandamusappellate-procedurearbitrationassault-iiedauto-accidentauto-insurance-uimchild-custodychild-supportcivil-litigationconstitutionalconstructionconsumer-dtpacontractsconversioncps-terminationcriminaldefamationdiscoverydivorce-propertyeasements-boundarieselectionseminent-domainemploymentevictionevidencefamilyforeclosurefraudgovernment-municipalgroundwaterhabeashealthcare-medmalhoa-condohomicideineffective-assistanceinsurancejurisdiction-traplaborlandlord-tenantlegal-malpracticelimitationsnuisance-trespassoil-gasopen-recordsotherpersonal-injurypremises-liabilityprobateproducts-liabilityprofessional-responsibilityreal-estate-brokersreal-propertyschool-lawsearch-seizuresovereign-immunitysummary-judgmenttaxtheft-fraud-crimestorttortious-interferencetruckingvenue-forumworkers-compwrongful-death
67%hll-cl11410528-1venue-forumdifficulty 4private splitdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash · dr2
Axes
Outcome100%×2
Standard-×2
Authority0%×2
Quote fidelity100%×2
Citation checks
found74 S.W.3d 849 · in DocketRouter index
Quote fidelity (every quotation must exist verbatim in its source)
supported for: mere presence of multiple plaintiffs in front of the [trial court] does not suffice to invoke appellate jurisdiction
Private-split item: facts, answer key and answer withheld so the leaderboard stays uncontaminated. The scores above are complete.
30636ms · graded 2026-08-27 20:14
25%hll-cl11410528-3venue-forumdifficulty 5private splitdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash · dr2
Axes
Outcome100%×2
Standard-×2
Authority75%×2
Quote fidelity33%×2
Citation checks
found392 S.W.3d 88 · in DocketRouter index
in opinion718 S.W.3d 233
found398 S.W.3d 734 · in DocketRouter index
Quote fidelity (every quotation must exist verbatim in its source)
unsupported718 S.W.3d 233 for: in a case in which the trial court determines venue under this section
unsupported718 S.W.3d 233 for: a plaintiff’s independent claim to venue is at issue
supported398 S.W.3d 734 for: the mere presence of multiple plaintiffs in front of the [trial court] does not suffice to invoke appellate jurisdiction
no passage398 S.W.3d 734 for: permits interlocutory appeals only in cases where a plaintiff’s independent claim to venue is at issue
Private-split item: facts, answer key and answer withheld so the leaderboard stays uncontaminated. The scores above are complete.
47081ms · graded 2026-08-27 18:06
25%hll-cl11410528-1venue-forumdifficulty 4private splitdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash · raw
Axes
Outcome100%×2
Standard-×2
Authority0%×2
Quote fidelity0%×2
Citation checks
found611 S.W.3d 1 · in DocketRouter index
found997 S.W.2d 194 · in DocketRouter index
Quote fidelity (every quotation must exist verbatim in its source)
unsupported for: If a plaintiff cannot independently establish proper venue, the trial court shall transfer an action to a county of proper venue or dismiss
unsupported for: The plaintiff may appeal the trial court’s determination under this section
Private-split item: facts, answer key and answer withheld so the leaderboard stays uncontaminated. The scores above are complete.
23277ms · graded 2026-08-27 16:21
25%hll-cl11410528-3venue-forumdifficulty 5private splitdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash · raw
Axes
Outcome100%×2
Standard-×2
Authority75%×2
Quote fidelity0%×2
Citation checks
found611 S.W.3d 1 · in DocketRouter index
Quote fidelity (every quotation must exist verbatim in its source)
unsupported for: An interlocutory appeal may be taken from a trial court’s determination under Subsection (a) that: (1) a plaintiff did not properly join a p
unsupported for: Section 15.003(b) does not authorize an interlocutory appeal from every venue ruling. It authorizes an appeal only from a trial court’s dete
unsupported for: requires a trial court to make a determination
unsupported for: the court of appeals must have jurisdiction to review that determination
Private-split item: facts, answer key and answer withheld so the leaderboard stays uncontaminated. The scores above are complete.
29556ms · graded 2026-08-27 15:36