docketrouter

Indemnity in Texas

The 3 rules we hold for this clause in Texas, with every authority and the sentences that state it. Nothing on this page was written by a model.

read at the 2026-10-03 barread on 2026-10-06; the reading recorded “defective”

Will this construction indemnity clause covering the indemnitee's own negligence hold up in Texas?

No, to that extent. Except as provided by § 151.103, a provision in a construction contract, or in an agreement collateral to or affecting a construction contract: is void and unenforceable as against public policy to the extent it requires an indemnitor to indemnify, hold harmless, OR DEFEND a party, including a third party, against a claim caused by the negligence or fault, the breach or violation of a statute, ordinance, governmental regulation, standard or rule, or the breach of contract, of the INDEMNITEE, its agent or employee, or any third party under the control or supervision of the indemnitee: other than the indemnitor or its own agent, employee, or subcontractor of any tier. 'Claim' is defined broadly: under § 151.001(4) it includes a loss or liability for a claim, damage, expense, or governmentally imposed fine, penalty, administrative action or other action, so a fines-and-penalties indemnity is voided to the extent the indemnitee's own statutory or regulatory violation caused the fine. The subchapter reaches a construction contract only where it is for a construction project for which an indemnitor is provided or procures insurance subject to Ins. Code ch. 151 or to Title 10, and that is so whether the insurance is put in place before or after the contract is executed (§ 151.101). It does not reach a single family house, townhouse, duplex or land development directly related to one at all, § 151.001(2) removes them from 'construction project' and § 151.105(10)(A) repeats the exclusion, nor an indemnity provision pertaining to a public works project of a municipality (§ 151.105(10)(B)), nor an agreement subject to CPRC ch. 127 (§ 151.105(7)). On those jobs this subchapter does not void the clause.

The trap

Three things drafters miss, and one exception they rely on. First, the section voids the DUTY TO DEFEND as well as the duty to indemnify, and the defense obligation is usually the expensive one. Second, 'to the extent that' means the clause is pared back, not struck whole: the parts allocating the indemnitor's OWN fault survive. Third, the voided conduct is not limited to negligence: breach of a statute, ordinance, regulation, standard or rule, and breach of contract by the indemnitee, are all inside it. The exception is § 151.103: the section does not apply to a provision requiring indemnity, hold-harmless or defense against a claim for the bodily injury or death of an EMPLOYEE of the indemnitor, its agent, or its subcontractor of any tier. That is the carve-out most construction indemnity clauses are actually drafted around, and it is narrow: an employee claim, not a third-party property or public claim. Two further sections decide whether any of this bites at all, and the earlier reading left both out. § 151.105 lists eleven things the subchapter 'does not affect', and three of them swallow whole jobs: a single family house, townhouse or duplex, or land development directly related to one; a public works project of a municipality; and any agreement subject to CPRC ch. 127, the wells-and-mines chapter. It also leaves alone insurance policies (except as § 151.104 provides), a breach-of-contract or warranty claim that exists independently of the indemnity obligation, indemnity provisions in loan and financing documents, general agreements of indemnity sureties require as a condition of executing bonds, workers'-compensation and governmental-immunity benefits, a railroad licence agreement for accommodation work, copyright-infringement indemnity, and a joint defense agreement entered into after a claim is made. § 151.001(2) keeps the same single family house, townhouse, duplex and related land development out of 'construction project' in the first place. Pointing the obligation at an insurance policy instead does not rescue it: § 151.104 voids a contract provision requiring the purchase of additional insured coverage to the extent it requires or provides coverage whose scope the subchapter prohibits for an agreement to indemnify, hold harmless or defend, the one exception being a provision or endorsement in a policy issued under a consolidated insurance program, defined in § 151.001(1) as a program under which a principal provides general liability coverage, workers' compensation coverage, or both, incorporated into an insurance program for one or more construction projects, to the extent it merely lists, adds or deletes named insureds. And § 151.151 forecloses drafting around any of it: a provision of the chapter may not be waived by contract or otherwise.

as of 2026-09-14· reaches construction contracts only

8 authorities

  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.102enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    Except as provided by Section 151.103 , a provision in a construction contract, or in an agreement collateral to or affecting a construction contract, is void and unenforceable as against public policy to the extent that it requires an indemnitor to indemnify, hold harmless, or defend a party, including a third party, against a claim caused by the negligence or fault, the breach or violation of a statute, ordinance, governmental regulation, standard, or rule, or the breach of contract of the indemnitee, its agent or employee, or any third party under the control or supervision of the indemnitee, other than the indemnitor or its agent, employee, or subcontractor of any tier.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.103enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    Section 151.102 does not apply to a provision in a construction contract that requires a person to indemnify, hold harmless, or defend another party to the construction contract or a third party against a claim for the bodily injury or death of an employee of the indemnitor, its agent, or its subcontractor of any tier.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.101enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    (a) This subchapter applies to a construction contract for a construction project for which an indemnitor is provided or procures insurance subject to: (1) this chapter; or (2) Title 10. (b) Subsection (a) applies regardless of whether the insurance is provided or procured before or after execution of the contract.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.001enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    (1) "Consolidated insurance program" means a program under which a principal provides general liability insurance coverage, workers' compensation insurance coverage, or both that are incorporated into an insurance program for a single construction project or multiple construction projects. (2) "Construction project" means construction, remodeling, maintenance, or repair of improvements to real property. The term includes the immediate construction location and areas incidental and necessary to the work as defined in the construction contract documents. A construction project under this chapter does not include a single family house, townhouse, duplex, or land development directly related thereto. (3) "Contractor" means any person who has entered into a construction contract or a professional services contract and is enrolled in the consolidated insurance program. (4) "Claim" includes a loss or liability for a claim, damage, expense, or governmentally imposed fine, penalty, administrative action, or other action.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.001enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    (5) "Construction contract" means a contract, subcontract, or agreement, or a performance bond assuring the performance of any of the foregoing, entered into or made by an owner, architect, engineer, contractor, construction manager, subcontractor, supplier, or material or equipment lessor for the design, construction, alteration, renovation, remodeling, repair, or maintenance of, or for the furnishing of material or equipment for, a building, structure, appurtenance, or other improvement to or on public or private real property, including moving, demolition, and excavation connected with the real property. The term includes an agreement to which an architect, engineer, or contractor and an owner's lender are parties regarding an assignment of the construction contract or other modifications thereto. (6) "Indemnitor" means a party to a construction contract that is required to provide indemnification or additional insured status to another party to the construction contract or to a third party.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.104enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a provision in a construction contract that requires the purchase of additional insured coverage, or any coverage endorsement, or provision within an insurance policy providing additional insured coverage, is void and unenforceable to the extent that it requires or provides coverage the scope of which is prohibited under this subchapter for an agreement to indemnify, hold harmless, or defend. (b) This section does not apply to a provision in an insurance policy, or an endorsement to an insurance policy, issued under a consolidated insurance program to the extent that the provision or endorsement lists, adds, or deletes named insureds to the policy.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.105enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    This subchapter does not affect: (1) an insurance policy, including a policy issued under an owner-controlled or owner-sponsored consolidated insurance program or a contractor-controlled or contractor-sponsored consolidated insurance program, except as provided by Section 151.104 ; (2) a cause of action for breach of contract or warranty that exists independently of an indemnity obligation, including an indemnity obligation in a construction contract under a construction project for which insurance is provided under a consolidated insurance program; (3) indemnity provisions contained in loan and financing documents, other than construction contracts to which the contractor and owner's lender are parties as provided under Section 151.001 (5); (4) general agreements of indemnity required by sureties as a condition of execution of bonds for construction contracts; (5) the benefits and protections under the workers' compensation laws of this state; (6) the benefits or protections under the governmental immunity laws of this state; (7) agreements subject to Chapter 127 , Civil Practice and Remedies Code; (8) a license agreement between a railroad company and a person that permits the person to enter the railroad company's property as an accommodation to the person for work under a construction contract that does not primarily benefit the railroad company; (9) an indemnity provision pertaining to a claim based upon copyright infringement; (10) an indemnity provision in a construction contract, or in an agreement collateral to or affecting a construction contract, pertaining to: (A) a single family house, townhouse, duplex, or land development directly related thereto; or (B) a public works project of a municipality; or (11) a joint defense agreement entered into after a claim is made.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.151enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    A provision of this chapter may not be waived by contract or otherwise.

“Defective” means that reading found something to correct. What you are reading is the rule as it stands after that reading.

read at the 2026-10-03 barread on 2026-10-06; the reading recorded “defective”

Can a construction contract make the contractor indemnify the architect or engineer for design defects?

No, for injury and property damage, and the chapter runs in more than one direction. Under § 130.002(a) a covenant or promise in, in connection with, or collateral to a construction contract is void and unenforceable if it provides for the contractor who is to perform the work to indemnify or hold harmless a registered architect, licensed engineer, or land surveyor (or their agent, servant or employee) from liability for damage that is caused by defects in plans, designs or specifications the design professional prepared, approved or used, or by the design professional's negligence in professional duties under the contract, AND that arises from personal injury or death, property injury, or any other expense arising from those. Under (b), a design professional whose services are the subject of a non-residential construction contract cannot be made to indemnify the OWNER for the owner's own negligence. Under (c), subject to (d)-(f), a design professional cannot be made to DEFEND a party against a claim based wholly or partly on the owner's negligence, fault or breach, though the contract may provide for reimbursement of the owner's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the design professional's liability.

The trap

Three directions, not one. Where Ins. Code ch. 151 applies at all: § 151.101 confines that subchapter to a construction contract for a project for which an indemnitor is provided or procures insurance subject to ch. 151 or Title 10, before or after execution: § 151.102 voids, to that extent, a provision requiring an indemnitor to indemnify, hold harmless or defend a party against a claim caused by the negligence or fault, statutory or regulatory breach, or breach of contract of the INDEMNITEE, its agent or employee, or a third party under its control, other than the indemnitor or its own agent, employee or subcontractor of any tier (its exceptions and the projects it does not reach are quoted in the Texas construction-indemnity rule, tx-anti-indemnity-construction-contracts). § 130.002(a) stops a design professional from pushing design-defect and professional-negligence risk onto the contractor, but only for damage arising from personal injury, death or property injury, so a clause allocating a purely economic design-defect loss is not voided by (a). That is not a safe harbour against ch. 151: where the architect or engineer is the indemnitee and its own negligence caused the loss, § 151.102 reaches the same clause on an insured project whatever its subject matter. Then (b) and (c) turn around and protect the design professional from the OWNER: no indemnity for the owner's negligence on a non-residential job, and no duty to defend the owner for the owner's fault, with (d) (owner may require additional-insured status and any defense the policy gives a named insured), (e) (design-build contracts are outside (c)) and (f) (a covenant to defend a negligent-hiring claim survives). § 130.005 makes the other boundary explicit: the chapter does not reach a clause indemnifying the design professional for the CONTRACTOR's or a subcontractor's own negligence, so a contractor can still be made to answer for its own acts. The protection is keyed to REGISTERED architects, LICENSED engineers and land surveyors, so an unlicensed designer is outside it, but note what § 130.001 actually defines: 'construction contract', and 'land surveyor' (a registered professional land surveyor or licensed state land surveyor as those terms are defined by Occupations Code § 1071.002). It does not define 'registered architect' or 'licensed engineer' at all. Two more sections set the chapter's outer edge. § 130.003 keeps an insurance contract and a workers' compensation agreement out of the chapter entirely. § 130.004 keeps the OWNER of an interest in real property out of it (except for § 130.002(b), § 130.002(c) and § 130.0021), and § 130.004(b)(2) expressly leaves standing a covenant to allocate, release, liquidate, limit or exclude liability between an owner (or other person for whom the work is being performed) and a registered architect, licensed engineer or land surveyor, so a cap on damages between owner and designer that leaves the standard of care alone is not what this chapter voids. The preservation is not unqualified: § 130.004(b)'s own stem is 'Except as provided by Section 130.002(b) or (c) or Section 130.0021', and a limitation that works by setting a standard of care different from the § 130.0021(a) standard is void under § 130.0021(b), with the statutory standard applying instead. Running the other way, § 130.0021 is an obligation no one can draft around: a construction contract for architectural, engineering or land surveying services MUST require that the work be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent practitioners under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; a provision setting a different standard is void and the statutory standard applies instead; and § 130.004 does not limit that section.

as of 2026-09-14· reaches construction contracts only

11 authorities

  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.002enacted 2025-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    (a) A covenant or promise in, in connection with, or collateral to a construction contract is void and unenforceable if the covenant or promise provides for a contractor who is to perform the work that is the subject of the construction contract to indemnify or hold harmless a registered architect, licensed engineer, or land surveyor, or an agent, servant, or employee of a registered architect, licensed engineer, or land surveyor from liability for damage that: (1) is caused by or results from: (A) defects in plans, designs, or specifications prepared, approved, or used by the architect, engineer, or land surveyor; or (B) negligence of the architect, engineer, or land surveyor in the rendition or conduct of professional duties called for or arising out of the construction contract and the plans, designs, or specifications that are a part of the construction contract; and (2) arises from: (A) personal injury or death; (B) property injury; or (C) any other expense that arises from personal injury, death, or property injury.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.002enacted 2025-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    (2) arises from: (A) personal injury or death; (B) property injury; or (C) any other expense that arises from personal injury, death, or property injury. (b) A covenant or promise in, in connection with, or collateral to a construction contract other than a contract for a single family or multifamily residence is void and unenforceable if the covenant or promise provides for a registered architect, licensed engineer, or land surveyor whose engineering, architectural, or land surveying design services are the subject of the construction contract to indemnify or hold harmless an owner or owner's agent or employee from liability for damage that is caused by or results from the negligence of an owner or an owner's agent or employee.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.002enacted 2025-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    (c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), (e), or (f), a covenant or promise in, in connection with, or collateral to a construction contract for engineering, architectural, or land surveying services related to an improvement to real property is void and unenforceable to the extent the covenant or promise provides that a licensed engineer, registered architect, or land surveyor must defend a party, including a third party, against a claim based wholly or partly on the negligence of, fault of, or breach of contract by the owner, the owner's agent, the owner's employee, or another entity over which the owner exercises control. A covenant or promise in, in connection with, or collateral to a contract for engineering, architectural, or land surveying services related to an improvement to real property may provide for the reimbursement of an owner's reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the engineer's, architect's, or land surveyor's liability.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.005enacted 2025-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    This chapter does not apply to a contract or agreement in which an architect, engineer, or land surveyor, or an agent, servant, or employee of an architect, engineer, or land surveyor, is indemnified from liability for: (1) negligent acts other than those described by this chapter; or (2) negligent acts of the contractor, any subcontractor, any person directly or indirectly employed by the contractor or a subcontractor, or any person for whose acts the contractor or a subcontractor may be liable.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.002enacted 2025-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    (d) Notwithstanding Subsection (c), an owner that is a party to a contract for engineering, architectural, or land surveying services related to an improvement to real property may require in the contract that the engineer, architect, or land surveyor name the owner as an additional insured under any of the engineer's, architect's, or land surveyor's insurance coverage to the extent additional insureds are allowed under the policy and provide any defense to the owner provided by the policy to a named insured. (e) Subsection (c) does not apply to a contract for services in which an owner contracts with an entity to provide both design and construction services. (f) Subsection (c) does not apply to a covenant to defend a party, including a third party, for a claim of negligent hiring of the architect, engineer, or land surveyor.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.001enacted 2025-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    (1) "Construction contract" means a contract or agreement made and entered into by an owner, contractor, subcontractor, registered architect, licensed engineer, land surveyor, or supplier concerning the design, construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of a building, structure, appurtenance, road, highway, bridge, dam, levee, or other improvement to or on real property, including moving, demolition, and excavation connected with the real property. (2) "Land surveyor" means a registered professional land surveyor or licensed state land surveyor as those terms are defined by Section 1071.002 , Occupations Code.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.003enacted 1987-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    This chapter does not apply to: (1) an insurance contract; or (2) a workers' compensation agreement.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.004enacted 2025-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Except as provided by Section 130.002 (b) or (c) or Section 130.0021 , this chapter does not apply to an owner of an interest in real property or persons employed solely by that owner. (b) Except as provided by Section 130.002 (b) or (c) or Section 130.0021 , this chapter does not prohibit or make void or unenforceable a covenant or promise to: (1) indemnify or hold harmless an owner of an interest in real property and persons employed solely by that owner; or (2) allocate, release, liquidate, limit, or exclude liability in connection with a construction contract between an owner or other person for whom a construction contract is being performed and a registered architect, licensed engineer, or land surveyor.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 130.0021enacted 2025-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    (a) A construction contract for architectural, engineering, or land surveying services or a contract related to the construction or repair of an improvement to real property that contains architectural, engineering, or land surveying services as a component part must require that the architectural, engineering, or land surveying services be performed with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent architects, engineers, or land surveyors practicing under the same or similar circumstances and professional license. (b) If a contract described by Subsection (a) contains a provision establishing a different standard of care than the standard described by Subsection (a): (1) the provision is void and unenforceable; and (2) the standard of care described by Subsection (a) applies to the performance of the architectural, engineering, or land surveying services. (c) Section 130.004 does not limit the applicability of this section.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.102enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    Except as provided by Section 151.103 , a provision in a construction contract, or in an agreement collateral to or affecting a construction contract, is void and unenforceable as against public policy to the extent that it requires an indemnitor to indemnify, hold harmless, or defend a party, including a third party, against a claim caused by the negligence or fault, the breach or violation of a statute, ordinance, governmental regulation, standard, or rule, or the breach of contract of the indemnitee, its agent or employee, or any third party under the control or supervision of the indemnitee, other than the indemnitor or its agent, employee, or subcontractor of any tier.
  • statuteTex. Ins. Code § 151.101enacted 2012-01-01
    The words that state the rule
    (a) This subchapter applies to a construction contract for a construction project for which an indemnitor is provided or procures insurance subject to: (1) this chapter; or (2) Title 10. (b) Subsection (a) applies regardless of whether the insurance is provided or procured before or after execution of the contract.

“Defective” means that reading found something to correct. What you are reading is the rule as it stands after that reading.

read at the 2026-10-03 barread on 2026-10-06; the reading recorded “defective”

Will this indemnity in an oilfield services agreement cover the indemnitee's own negligence?

No, unless it is insurance-backed, which is how the industry actually writes it. Except as otherwise provided by the chapter, a covenant, promise, agreement or understanding contained in, collateral to, or affecting an agreement pertaining to a well for oil, gas, or water, or to a mine for a mineral, is void if it purports to indemnify a person against loss or liability for damage that (1) is caused by or results from the SOLE OR CONCURRENT negligence of the indemnitee, his agent or employee, or an individual contractor directly responsible to the indemnitee, and (2) arises from personal injury or death, property injury, or any other loss, damage or expense arising from personal injury, death or property injury. But under § 127.005 the chapter does not apply at all where the parties agree in writing that the indemnity will be supported by liability insurance furnished by the indemnitor: a MUTUAL indemnity obligation is then enforceable to the extent of the coverage and dollar limits each party as indemnitor agreed to obtain for the benefit of the other, and for a UNILATERAL indemnity obligation the insurance required may not exceed $500,000. Both are DEFINED terms, and both are narrower than their ordinary meaning. Under § 127.001(3) a mutual indemnity obligation is one in which the parties agree to indemnify each other and each other's contractors and their employees against loss, liability or damages arising in connection with bodily injury, death and damage to property of the respective employees, contractors or their employees, and invitees of each party; under § 127.001(6) a unilateral indemnity obligation is one in which one party as indemnitor indemnifies the other with respect to claims for personal injury or death to the indemnitor's employees or agents or to the employees or agents of the indemnitor's contractors, with no reciprocal indemnity from the indemnitee. An insurance-supported indemnity that fits neither definition is not carried out of the chapter by § 127.005 and falls back under § 127.003, where it is void. The chapter's definition of a covered agreement excludes a joint operating agreement (§ 127.001(1)(B), with 'joint operating agreement' defined in § 127.001(2) as an agreement between or among holders of working interests or operating rights for joint exploration, development, operation or production of minerals), but the chapter does not ignore JOAs: § 127.002(c) is a legislative finding that JOA provisions sharing costs or losses from joint activities, including losses attributable to a party's own negligence, are not against public policy and are enforceable unless expressly excluded by written agreement.

The trap

The words 'sole or concurrent' defeat the standard workaround: drafters commonly carve out only the indemnitee's SOLE negligence and assume shared-fault scenarios still flow through; under this chapter they do not. But the served 'No' is the wrong headline for real oilfield paper, because § 127.005 is the door the whole industry walks through: write that the indemnity is supported by the indemnitor's liability insurance, and the chapter steps aside, capped at the agreed coverage for a mutual obligation and at $500,000 for a unilateral one, PROVIDED the obligation fits the statutory definition of a mutual or a unilateral indemnity obligation (§ 127.001(3) and (6), set out in the rule); a two-way indemnity that is not the reciprocal, each-other's-people cover § 127.001(3) describes is not 'mutual' for § 127.005 and stays void. So the drafting question is not whether to indemnify for the indemnitee's negligence but whether the insurance-support language and limits are present. Scope is wider than oil and gas (wells for WATER and mines for a mineral are inside) and narrower than it looks: a joint operating agreement is outside by definition, pipeline construction and gas transportation by pipeline are not 'well or mine service', and § 127.004 takes some losses out of the chapter entirely, but not symmetrically: radioactivity and wild-well control are excluded for personal injury, death AND property injury (and the cost of controlling a wild well is excluded outright), while pollution (including cleanup and control of the pollutant) and reservoir or underground damage are excluded only as PROPERTY injury, so an indemnity for bodily injury or death caused by pollution stays inside § 127.003. 'Wild well' is itself defined (§ 127.001(5)): one from which the escape of oil or gas is not intended and cannot be controlled by equipment used in normal drilling practice. § 127.007 preserves a surface-estate owner's right to secure indemnity from a lessee, an operator, a contractor or other person conducting exploration or production operations on the owner's land, and § 127.006 leaves untouched the validity of an insurance contract and any benefit the workers' compensation statutes confer. The joint-operating-agreement exclusion is not an accident of drafting: in § 127.002(c) the legislature finds that JOA provisions sharing costs or losses from joint activities, INCLUDING losses attributable to a party's own negligent acts or omissions, are commonly understood and desired, encourage mineral development, are not against public policy, and are enforceable unless those costs or losses are expressly excluded by written agreement. So under a JOA the default runs the opposite way from the default under § 127.003, and it is the express written exclusion, not the indemnity, that has to be drafted.

as of 2026-09-14· reaches oilfield and mining services only

9 authorities

  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.003enacted 1985-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, a covenant, promise, agreement, or understanding contained in, collateral to, or affecting an agreement pertaining to a well for oil, gas, or water or to a mine for a mineral is void if it purports to indemnify a person against loss or liability for damage that: (1) is caused by or results from the sole or concurrent negligence of the indemnitee, his agent or employee, or an individual contractor directly responsible to the indemnitee; and (2) arises from: (A) personal injury or death; (B) property injury; or (C) any other loss, damage, or expense that arises from personal injury, death, or property injury.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.005enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) This chapter does not apply to an agreement that provides for indemnity if the parties agree in writing that the indemnity obligation will be supported by liability insurance coverage to be furnished by the indemnitor subject to the limitations specified in Subsection (b) or (c). (b) With respect to a mutual indemnity obligation, the indemnity obligation is limited to the extent of the coverage and dollar limits of insurance or qualified self-insurance each party as indemnitor has agreed to obtain for the benefit of the other party as indemnitee. (c) With respect to a unilateral indemnity obligation, the amount of insurance required may not exceed $500,000.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.001enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (1) "Agreement pertaining to a well for oil, gas, or water or to a mine for a mineral": (A) means: (i) a written or oral agreement or understanding concerning the rendering of well or mine services; or (ii) an agreement to perform a part of those services or an act collateral to those services, including furnishing or renting equipment, incidental transportation, or other goods and services furnished in connection with the services; but (B) does not include a joint operating agreement.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.001enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (2) "Joint operating agreement" means an agreement between or among holders of working interests or operating rights for the joint exploration, development, operation, or production of minerals. (3) "Mutual indemnity obligation" means an indemnity obligation in an agreement pertaining to a well for oil, gas, or water or to a mine for a mineral in which the parties agree to indemnify each other and each other's contractors and their employees against loss, liability, or damages arising in connection with bodily injury, death, and damage to property of the respective employees, contractors or their employees, and invitees of each party arising out of or resulting from the performance of the agreement. (4) "Well or mine service": (A) includes: (i) drilling, deepening, reworking, repairing, improving, testing, treating, perforating, acidizing, logging, conditioning, purchasing, gathering, storing, or transporting oil, brine water, fresh water, produced water, condensate, petroleum products, or other liquid commodities, or otherwise rendering services in connection with a well drilled to produce or dispose of oil, gas, other minerals or water; and (ii) designing, excavating, constructing, improving, or otherwise rendering services in connection with a mine shaft, drift, or other structure intended for use in exploring for or producing a mineral; but (B) does not include: (i) purchasing, selling, gathering, storing, or transporting gas or natural gas liquids by pipeline or fixed associated facilities; or (ii) construction, maintenance, or repair of oil, natural gas liquids, or gas pipelines or fixed associated facilities. (5) "Wild well" means a well from which the escape of oil or gas is not intended and cannot be controlled by equipment used in normal drilling practice. (6) "Unilateral indemnity obligation" means an indemnity obligation in an agreement pertaining to a well for oil, gas, or water or to a mine for a mineral in which one of the parties as indemnitor agrees to indemnify the other party as indemnitee with respect to claims for personal injury or death to the indemnitor's employees or agents or to the employees or agents of the indemnitor's contractors but in which the indemnitee does not make a reciprocal indemnity to the indemnitor.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.004enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    This chapter does not apply to loss or liability for damages or an expense arising from: (1) personal injury, death, or property injury that results from radioactivity; (2) property injury that results from pollution, including cleanup and control of the pollutant; (3) property injury that results from reservoir or underground damage, including loss of oil, gas, other mineral substance, or water or the well bore itself; (4) personal injury, death, or property injury that results from the performance of services to control a wild well to protect the safety of the general public or to prevent depletion of vital natural resources; or (5) cost of control of a wild well, underground or above the surface.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.001enacted 1991-04-19
    The words that state the rule
    (4) "Well or mine service": (A) includes: (i) drilling, deepening, reworking, repairing, improving, testing, treating, perforating, acidizing, logging, conditioning, purchasing, gathering, storing, or transporting oil, brine water, fresh water, produced water, condensate, petroleum products, or other liquid commodities, or otherwise rendering services in connection with a well drilled to produce or dispose of oil, gas, other minerals or water; and (ii) designing, excavating, constructing, improving, or otherwise rendering services in connection with a mine shaft, drift, or other structure intended for use in exploring for or producing a mineral; but (B) does not include: (i) purchasing, selling, gathering, storing, or transporting gas or natural gas liquids by pipeline or fixed associated facilities; or (ii) construction, maintenance, or repair of oil, natural gas liquids, or gas pipelines or fixed associated facilities.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.007enacted 1985-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    This chapter does not deprive an owner of the surface estate of the right to secure indemnity from a lessee, an operator, a contractor, or other person conducting operations for the exploration or production of minerals of the owner's land.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.002enacted 1991-04-19
    The words that state the rule
    (b) Certain agreements that provide for indemnification of a negligent indemnitee are against the public policy of this state. (c) The legislature finds that joint operating agreement provisions for the sharing of costs or losses arising from joint activities, including costs or losses attributable to the negligent acts or omissions of any party conducting the joint activity: (1) are commonly understood, accepted, and desired by the parties to joint operating agreements; (2) encourage mineral development; (3) are not against the public policy of this state; and (4) are enforceable unless those costs or losses are expressly excluded by written agreement.
  • statuteTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 127.006enacted 1985-09-01
    The words that state the rule
    This chapter does not affect: (1) the validity of an insurance contract; or (2) a benefit conferred by the workers' compensation statutes of this state.

“Defective” means that reading found something to correct. What you are reading is the rule as it stands after that reading.

The same clause elsewhere

26 other states we answer indemnity for. Read them side by side in the survey.