docketrouter

Non-competition in California

The 2 rules we hold for this clause in California, with every authority and the sentences that state it. Nothing on this page was written by a model.

read at the 2026-10-03 barread on 2026-10-07; the reading recorded “defective”

Beyond 'non-competes are void in California', what actually governs this restraint?

For employees: noncompetition agreements are invalid under Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600 even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the statutory exceptions of §§ 16601, 16602 or 16602.5: the court rejected the Ninth Circuit's 'narrow-restraint' exception (Edwards). Section 16600.1 makes it UNLAWFUL to include a noncompete clause in an employment contract, or to require an employee to enter a noncompete agreement, that does not satisfy an exception; employers had to notify current employees and former employees employed after January 1, 2022 by February 14, 2024 that the clause is void; and a violation is an act of unfair competition (§ 16600.1). For restraints BETWEEN BUSINESSES, § 16600 is not a per se rule: in context it is best read not to render void per se all contractual restraints on business dealings, but rather to subject such restraints to a rule of reason (Ixchel). The principal exception remains the sale of goodwill or of an owner's entire ownership interest, which may support a covenant not to carry on a similar business within a specified geographic area so long as the buyer carries on the business there (§ 16601). Since 2024 Edwards is in the statute itself: § 16600(b)(1) directs that the section "be read broadly, in accordance with Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, to void the application of any noncompete agreement in an employment context, or any noncompete clause in an employment contract, no matter how narrowly tailored, that does not satisfy an exception in this chapter", declared to be existing law, and § 16600(c) reaches a restraint on a person who is not a party to the contract. Section 16600.5 then makes the void contract unenforceable "regardless of where and when the contract was signed", forbids an employer to attempt to enforce it "regardless of whether the contract was signed and the employment was maintained outside of California", and gives the employee a private action for injunctive relief or actual damages with fees and costs to a prevailing employee (§ 16600.5(a), (b), (e)).

The trap

The California rule most out-of-state drafters carry is half right in both directions. Narrowing the restraint does not save an EMPLOYEE covenant. That is the exact argument Edwards rejected. But assuming everything is void is wrong where the restraint runs between two businesses: Ixchel holds that a rule of reason applies to determine the validity of 'a contractual provision by which a business is restrained from engaging in a lawful trade or business' with another business, and it held the exclusivity provision before it to be such a restraint while expressing no view on the validity of the agreement at issue. And § 16600.1 turned the clause itself into a violation: including a noncompete clause in an employment contract that satisfies no exception is unlawful and an act of unfair competition within the meaning of § 17200, not merely an unenforceable term. For the out-of-state drafter the sharpest edge is § 16600.5(a)-(b): a covenant signed in another state, under that state's law, by an employee who then worked there, is still unenforceable in California and the employer's attempt to enforce it is itself the violation: the choice-of-law clause does not travel.

as of 2026-09-16

10 authorities

  • case44 Cal. 4th 937Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCal.decided 2008read it at the source ↗
    The words that state the rule
    We hold that the noncompetition agreement here is invalid under section 16600, and we reject the narrow-restraint exception urged by Andersen. Noncompetition agreements are invalid under section 16600 in California, even if narrowly drawn, unless they fall within the applicable statutory exceptions of section 16601, 16602, or 16602.5. In addition, we conclude that the TONC at issue in this case did not purport to release Andersen from any nonwaivable statutory claims and therefore is not unlawful under Labor Code sections 2802 and 2804. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part the Court of Appeal judgment, and remand the matter for proceedings consistent with the views expressed above.
  • case9 Cal. 5th 1130Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.Cal.decided 2020read it at the source ↗
    The words that state the rule
    In context, section 16600 is best read not to render void per se all contractual restraints on business dealings, but rather to subject such restraints to a rule of reason.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.1enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) It shall be unlawful to include a noncompete clause in an employment contract, or to require an employee to enter a noncompete agreement, that does not satisfy an exception in this chapter. (b) (1) For current employees, and for former employees who were employed after January 1, 2022, whose contracts include a noncompete clause, or who were required to enter a noncompete agreement, that does not satisfy an exception to this chapter, the employer shall, by February 14, 2024, notify the employee that the noncompete clause or noncompete agreement is void. (2) Notice made under this subdivision shall be in the form of a written individualized communication to the employee or former employee, and shall be delivered to the last known address and the email address of the employee or former employee. (c) A violation of this section constitutes an act of unfair competition within the meaning of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 17200).
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16601enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    Any person who sells the goodwill of a business, or any owner of a business entity selling or otherwise disposing of all of his or her ownership interest in the business entity, or any owner of a business entity that sells (a) all or substantially all of its operating assets together with the goodwill of the business entity, (b) all or substantially all of the operating assets of a division or a subsidiary of the business entity together with the goodwill of that division or subsidiary, or (c) all of the ownership interest of any subsidiary, may agree with the buyer to refrain from carrying on a similar business within a specified geographic area in which the business so sold, or that of the business entity, division, or subsidiary has been carried on, so long as the buyer, or any person deriving title to the goodwill or ownership interest from the buyer, carries on a like business therein. For the purposes of this section, “business entity” means any partnership (including a limited partnership or a limited liability partnership), limited liability company (including a series of a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction that recognizes such a series), or corporation. For the purposes of this section, “owner of a business entity” means any partner, in the case of a business entity that is a partnership (including a limited partnership or a limited liability partnership), or any member, in the case of a business entity that is a limited liability company (including a series of a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction that recognizes such a series), or any owner of capital stock, in the case of a business entity that is a corporation. For the purposes of this section, “ownership interest” means a partnership interest, in the case of a business entity that is a partnership (including a limited partnership a limited liability partnership), a membership interest, in the case of a business entity that is a limited liability company (including a series of a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction that recognizes such a series), or a capital stockholder, in the case of a business entity that is a corporation. For the purposes of this section, “subsidiary” means any business entity over which the selling business entity has voting control or from which the selling business entity has a right to receive a majority share of distributions upon dissolution or other liquidation of the business entity (or has both voting control and a right to receive these distributions.)
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Except as provided in this chapter, every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void. (b) (1) This section shall be read broadly, in accordance with Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, to void the application of any noncompete agreement in an employment context, or any noncompete clause in an employment contract, no matter how narrowly tailored, that does not satisfy an exception in this chapter. (2) This subdivision does not constitute a change in, but is declaratory of, existing law. (c) This section shall not be limited to contracts where the person being restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business is a party to the contract.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.5enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Any contract that is void under this chapter is unenforceable regardless of where and when the contract was signed. (b) An employer or former employer shall not attempt to enforce a contract that is void under this chapter regardless of whether the contract was signed and the employment was maintained outside of California. (c) An employer shall not enter into a contract with an employee or prospective employee that includes a provision that is void under this chapter. (d) An employer that enters into a contract that is void under this chapter or attempts to enforce a contract that is void under this chapter commits a civil violation. (e) (1) An employee, former employee, or prospective employee may bring a private action to enforce this chapter for injunctive relief or the recovery of actual damages, or both. (2) In addition to the remedies described in paragraph (1), a prevailing employee, former employee, or prospective employee in an action based on a violation of this chapter shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16602enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Any partner may, upon or in anticipation of any of the circumstances described in subdivision (b), agree that he or she will not carry on a similar business within a specified geographic area where the partnership business has been transacted, so long as any other member of the partnership, or any person deriving title to the business or its goodwill from any such other member of the partnership, carries on a like business therein. (b) Subdivision (a) applies to either of the following circumstances: (1) A dissolution of the partnership. (2) Dissociation of the partner from the partnership.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16602.5enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    Any member may, upon or in anticipation of a dissolution of, or the termination of his or her interest in, a limited liability company (including a series of a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction recognizing such a series), agree that he or she or it will not carry on a similar business within a specified geographic area where the limited liability company business has been transacted, so long as any other member of the limited liability company, or any person deriving title to the business or its goodwill from any such other member of the limited liability company, carries on a like business therein.
  • case44 Cal. 4th 937Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCal.decided 2008read it at the source ↗
    The words that state the rule
    Contrary to Andersen’s belief, however, California courts have not embraced the Ninth Circuit’s narrow-restraint exception.
  • case9 Cal. 5th 1130Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.Cal.decided 2020read it at the source ↗
    The words that state the rule
    We also hold that a rule of reason applies to determine the validity of a contractual provision by which a business is restrained from engaging in a lawful trade or business with 40 IXCHEL PHARMA, LLC v. BIOGEN, INC. Opinion of the Court by Liu, J. another business. Section 2.13 of the Biogen-Forward Agreement is such a restraint because it prevents Forward from collaborating with Ixchel or any other partner in the development of treatments containing the active ingredient DMF. Its validity under section 16600 must therefore be evaluated based on a rule of reason. We express no view on the validity of the agreement at issue.

“Defective” means that reading found something to correct. What you are reading is the rule as it stands after that reading.

read at the 2026-10-03 barread on 2026-10-07; the reading recorded “defective”

Will a California court enforce a non-compete against a departing employee?

No, in employment, and the chapter says where the exceptions are. Every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is void to that extent, and § 16600 is by its own terms to be read broadly to void the application of any noncompete agreement in an employment context, and that direction “does not constitute a change in, but is declaratory of, existing law.” § 16600.5 adds that a contract void under the chapter is unenforceable regardless of where or when it was signed, and forbids an employer from attempting to enforce one even where the contract was signed and the employment maintained outside California. The exceptions are the chapter's own: a person who sells the goodwill of a business, or an owner who sells all of an ownership interest or a business entity that sells all or substantially all of its operating assets with the goodwill, "may agree with the buyer to refrain from carrying on a similar business within a specified geographic area" so long as the buyer carries on a like business there (§ 16601); a partner may so agree upon or in anticipation of dissolution or dissociation (§ 16602); and a member of a limited liability company upon or in anticipation of dissolution or the termination of the member's interest (§ 16602.5). Outside those, § 16600.1 makes it unlawful to include a noncompete clause in an employment contract at all, required employers by February 14, 2024 to notify current employees, and former employees “who were employed after January 1, 2022”, in writing that any such clause is void, and makes a violation an act of unfair competition under § 17200; and under § 16600.5 an employer that enters into or attempts to enforce a void contract commits a civil violation, for which the employee may sue for injunctive relief or actual damages and recovers attorney's fees and costs if prevailing. The chapter now also reaches the stay-or-pay substitute for a noncompete. For contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026, § 16608 makes it unlawful to include in an employment contract, or to require a worker to execute, a term that requires the worker to pay an employer, training provider or debt collector for a debt if the employment or work relationship terminates, that authorises them to resume or initiate collection of or end forbearance on a debt on termination, or that imposes any “penalty, fee, or cost” on the worker on termination, and “Penalty, fee, or cost” is defined to include “a replacement hire fee, retraining fee, replacement fee, quit fee, reimbursement for immigration or visa-related costs, liquidated damages, lost goodwill, and lost profit.” Such a contract “is a contract restraining a person from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business, and is void under Section 16600 only if the contract was entered into on or after January 1, 2026.” Section 16608(b)(2) excepts five things: a government loan repayment assistance or loan forgiveness program; repayment of tuition for a transferable credential, on five listed conditions; an apprenticeship programme approved by the Division of Apprenticeship Standards; a discretionary or unearned payment at the outset of employment, again on five listed conditions; and a contract for the lease, financing or purchase of residential property.

The trap

Making the clause reasonable as to time, geographic area and scope does not save it here, because reasonableness is not the test. Validity is, and the answer is void. § 16600.5(b) also reaches an out-of-state employer trying to enforce an out-of-state contract against someone working in California, so a choice-of-law clause pointing at a friendlier state does not solve it either. The one exception that is used every week is § 16601: a covenant given by a SELLER of a business or of the seller's whole ownership interest, limited to the geographic area where the business was carried on and lasting while the buyer carries on a like business, is enforceable, so 'void outright' is the employment answer, not the M&A answer, and the same signature page can carry a valid seller covenant and a void employee one. The other direction is new since 2024: merely including the clause is itself the violation, the employer owed every affected employee an individualised written notice by February 14, 2024, and § 16600(c) reaches a restraint on someone who is not even a party to the contract. The newest trap is not a noncompete at all. A training-repayment, quit-fee, retention or replacement-cost clause charging a departing worker is what § 16608 now treats as a restraint, void under § 16600 for contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026, so the usual workaround for an unenforceable noncompete has itself been closed, and the exits in § 16608(b)(2) are narrow, with the tuition and signing-bonus routes each carrying five conditions that all have to be met.

as of 2026-09-14

12 authorities

  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Except as provided in this chapter, every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void. (b) (1) This section shall be read broadly, in accordance with Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, to void the application of any noncompete agreement in an employment context, or any noncompete clause in an employment contract, no matter how narrowly tailored, that does not satisfy an exception in this chapter. (2) This subdivision does not constitute a change in, but is declaratory of, existing law.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.5enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Any contract that is void under this chapter is unenforceable regardless of where and when the contract was signed. (b) An employer or former employer shall not attempt to enforce a contract that is void under this chapter regardless of whether the contract was signed and the employment was maintained outside of California.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16601enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    Any person who sells the goodwill of a business, or any owner of a business entity selling or otherwise disposing of all of his or her ownership interest in the business entity, or any owner of a business entity that sells (a) all or substantially all of its operating assets together with the goodwill of the business entity, (b) all or substantially all of the operating assets of a division or a subsidiary of the business entity together with the goodwill of that division or subsidiary, or (c) all of the ownership interest of any subsidiary, may agree with the buyer to refrain from carrying on a similar business within a specified geographic area in which the business so sold, or that of the business entity, division, or subsidiary has been carried on, so long as the buyer, or any person deriving title to the goodwill or ownership interest from the buyer, carries on a like business therein. For the purposes of this section, “business entity” means any partnership (including a limited partnership or a limited liability partnership), limited liability company (including a series of a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction that recognizes such a series), or corporation. For the purposes of this section, “owner of a business entity” means any partner, in the case of a business entity that is a partnership (including a limited partnership or a limited liability partnership), or any member, in the case of a business entity that is a limited liability company (including a series of a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction that recognizes such a series), or any owner of capital stock, in the case of a business entity that is a corporation. For the purposes of this section, “ownership interest” means a partnership interest, in the case of a business entity that is a partnership (including a limited partnership a limited liability partnership), a membership interest, in the case of a business entity that is a limited liability company (including a series of a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction that recognizes such a series), or a capital stockholder, in the case of a business entity that is a corporation. For the purposes of this section, “subsidiary” means any business entity over which the selling business entity has voting control or from which the selling business entity has a right to receive a majority share of distributions upon dissolution or other liquidation of the business entity (or has both voting control and a right to receive these distributions.)
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16602enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) Any partner may, upon or in anticipation of any of the circumstances described in subdivision (b), agree that he or she will not carry on a similar business within a specified geographic area where the partnership business has been transacted, so long as any other member of the partnership, or any person deriving title to the business or its goodwill from any such other member of the partnership, carries on a like business therein. (b) Subdivision (a) applies to either of the following circumstances: (1) A dissolution of the partnership. (2) Dissociation of the partner from the partnership.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16602.5enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    Any member may, upon or in anticipation of a dissolution of, or the termination of his or her interest in, a limited liability company (including a series of a limited liability company formed under the laws of a jurisdiction recognizing such a series), agree that he or she or it will not carry on a similar business within a specified geographic area where the limited liability company business has been transacted, so long as any other member of the limited liability company, or any person deriving title to the business or its goodwill from any such other member of the limited liability company, carries on a like business therein.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.1enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) It shall be unlawful to include a noncompete clause in an employment contract, or to require an employee to enter a noncompete agreement, that does not satisfy an exception in this chapter. (b) (1) For current employees, and for former employees who were employed after January 1, 2022, whose contracts include a noncompete clause, or who were required to enter a noncompete agreement, that does not satisfy an exception to this chapter, the employer shall, by February 14, 2024, notify the employee that the noncompete clause or noncompete agreement is void. (2) Notice made under this subdivision shall be in the form of a written individualized communication to the employee or former employee, and shall be delivered to the last known address and the email address of the employee or former employee. (c) A violation of this section constitutes an act of unfair competition within the meaning of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 17200).
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.5enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (c) An employer shall not enter into a contract with an employee or prospective employee that includes a provision that is void under this chapter. (d) An employer that enters into a contract that is void under this chapter or attempts to enforce a contract that is void under this chapter commits a civil violation. (e) (1) An employee, former employee, or prospective employee may bring a private action to enforce this chapter for injunctive relief or the recovery of actual damages, or both. (2) In addition to the remedies described in paragraph (1), a prevailing employee, former employee, or prospective employee in an action based on a violation of this chapter shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (c) This section shall not be limited to contracts where the person being restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business is a party to the contract.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16608enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (a) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: (1) “Contract” includes a promise, undertaking, contract, or agreement, whether written or oral, express or implied. (2) “Debt” means money, personal property, or their equivalent that is due or owing or alleged to be due or owing from a natural person to another person, including, but not limited to, for employment-related costs, education-related costs, or a consumer financial product or service, regardless of whether the debt is certain, contingent, or incurred voluntarily. (3) “Debt collector” has the same meaning as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 1788.2 of the Civil Code. (4) “Employer” means any person or entity that employs workers. “Employer” includes any parent company, subsidiary, division, affiliate, contractor, hiring party, or third-party agent of an employer. (5) “Freelance worker” has the same meaning as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 18101. (6) “Misconduct” has the same meaning as in Section 1256 of the Unemployment Insurance Code. (7) “Penalty, fee, or cost” includes, but is not limited to, a replacement hire fee, retraining fee, replacement fee, quit fee, reimbursement for immigration or visa-related costs, liquidated damages, lost goodwill, and lost profit.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16608enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (b) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), for contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026, it shall be unlawful to include in any employment contract, or to require a worker to execute as a condition of employment or a work relationship a contract that includes, a contract term that does any of the following: (A) Requires the worker to pay an employer, training provider, or debt collector for a debt if the worker’s employment or work relationship with a specific employer terminates. (B) Authorizes the employer, training provider, or debt collector to resume or initiate collection of or end forbearance on a debt if the worker’s employment or work relationship with a specific employer terminates. (C) Imposes any penalty, fee, or cost on a worker if the worker’s employment or work relationship with a specific employer terminates.
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16608enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (2) This section does not apply to any of the following: (A) A contract entered into under any loan repayment assistance program or loan forgiveness program provided by a federal, state, or local governmental agency. (B) A contract related to the repayment of the cost of tuition for a transferable credential that meets all of the following requirements: (i) The contract is offered separately from any contract for employment. (ii) The contract does not require obtaining the transferable credential as a condition of employment. (iii) The contract specifies the repayment amount before the worker agrees to the contract, and the repayment amount does not exceed the cost to the employer of the transferable credential received by the worker. (iv) The contract provides for a prorated repayment amount during any required employment period that is proportional to the total repayment amount and the length of the required employment period and does not require an accelerated payment schedule if the worker separates from the employment. (v) The contract does not require repayment to the employer by the worker if the worker is terminated, except if the worker is terminated for misconduct. (C) A contract related to enrollment in an apprenticeship program approved by the Division of Apprenticeship Standards. (D) A contract for the receipt of a discretionary or unearned monetary payment, including a financial bonus, at the outset of employment that is not tied to specific job performance, provided that all of the following conditions are met: (i) The terms of any repayment obligation are set forth in a separate agreement from the primary employment contract. (ii) The employee is notified that they have the right to consult an attorney regarding the agreement and provided with a reasonable time period of not less than five business days to obtain advice of counsel prior to executing the agreement. (iii) Any repayment obligation for early separation from employment is not subject to interest accrual and is prorated based on the remaining term of any retention period, which shall not exceed two years from the receipt of payment. (iv) The worker has an option to defer receipt of the payment to the end of a fully served retention period without any repayment obligation. (v) Separation from employment prior to the retention period was at the sole election of the employee, or at the election of the employer for misconduct. (E) A contract related to the lease, financing, or purchase of residential property, including, but not limited to, a contract pursuant to the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act (Division 20 (commencing with Section 50000) of the Financial Code).
  • statuteCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16608enactment date not established
    The words that state the rule
    (c) A contract that is unlawful under subdivision (b) is a contract restraining a person from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business, and is void under Section 16600 only if the contract was entered into on or after January 1, 2026.

“Defective” means that reading found something to correct. What you are reading is the rule as it stands after that reading.

The same clause elsewhere

27 other states we answer non-competition for. Read them side by side in the survey.