docketrouter

Usury

28 states, 29 rules, 333 authorities. Each state's card gives the rule, the trap that makes a clause drafted elsewhere fail there, and every authority with the sentences that state the rule. A state not listed is one we do not answer this family for.

28 of 29 read at the 2026-10-03 bar. A rule read at an earlier bar is not a rule that passes this one, and each card says which it is.

  1. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What interest can be charged under an Alabama contract, and what happens if it is too high?

    The general cap is low, it yields to any other rate the law allows, and the exemption is wide. Except as otherwise provided by law, the maximum rate of interest upon the loan or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action, except by written contract, is $6 upon $100 for one year, and the rate by written contract is not to exceed $8 upon $100 for one year, and at that rate for a greater or lesser sum or a longer or shorter time (Ala. Code § 8-8-1). But any person, corporation, trust, general or limited partnership, or association may agree to pay whatever rate it determines for the loan or forbearance of money and for any credit sales, notwithstanding any law of the state otherwise limiting the rate, provided the ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE is not less than $2,000, and provided that all laws relating to unconscionability in consumer transactions, including the Mini-Code in Chapter 19 of Title 5, still apply (§ 8-8-5(a)); as to such a loan, neither the borrower nor any surety, guarantor or endorser may raise or claim the defence or benefit of the usury laws (§ 8-8-5(b)), and the section does not apply where the original principal balance is less than $2,000 (§ 8-8-5(d)). Where the cap does bite, all contracts for interest at a higher rate than the chapter prescribes are usurious and cannot be enforced except as to the principal; the borrower cannot be required to pay more than the principal sum borrowed, and interest already paid must be deducted from the principal, with judgment entered for the balance only, though usury may not be pleaded against a holder in due course of a negotiable instrument (§ 8-8-12). Individuals, partnerships, banks, corporations and other legal entities may also charge the same rate or finance charge, to the same extent and under the same circumstances and conditions, as any federal or state chartered or licensed lending institution with its principal place of business in Alabama, provided that an individual or partnership that charges more than such a lending institution is permitted to charge under other applicable law is subject to the same penalties that other law prescribes for excessive interest or finance charges (§ 8-8-1.1(a)). That section is cumulative and diminishes no existing right, and its amendment is retroactive to May 14, 1979 except that it changed no interest rate on a secured loan in existence as of April 25, 1980 (§ 8-8-1.1(b)).

    The trap

    The $2,000 line, not the 8 percent figure, is what decides almost every commercial question: at or above a $2,000 original principal balance the parties may agree any rate and the usury defence is gone for the borrower AND for sureties, guarantors and endorsers. "Original principal balance" is defined to include the total principal incurred or contracted for, without regard to the amount of any initial or later advance, and "interest" there includes all direct or indirect charges imposed as an incident to the loan, forbearance or credit sale (§ 8-8-5(c)). Below $2,000 the penalty is severe and one-directional: the lender loses all interest, and interest already paid comes off the principal. Unconscionability law and the Mini-Code survive the exemption by its own terms.

    as of 2026-09-17

    6 authorities

    • statuteAla. Code § 8-8-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as otherwise provided by law, the maximum rate of interest upon the loan or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action, except by written contract is $6 upon $100 for one year, and the rate of interest by written contract is not to exceed $8 upon $100 for one year and at that rate for a greater or less sum or for a longer or shorter time.
    • statuteAla. Code § 8-8-5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) Any person or persons, corporations, trust, general partnership or partnerships, limited partnership or partnerships, or association may agree to pay such rate or rates of interest for the loan or forbearance of money and for any credit sales as such person, corporation, trust, general partnership, limited partnership, or association may determine, notwithstanding any law of this state otherwise prescribing or limiting such rate or rates of interest; provided, that the original principal balance of the loan or forbearance of money or credit sales is not less than $2,000; provided further, that all laws relating to unconscionability in consumer transactions including but not limited to the provisions of Chapter 19 of Title 5, known as the Mini-Code, shall apply to transactions covered by this section. (b) As to any such loan or forbearance of money or credit sales made in compliance with subsection (a) of this section, neither such person, corporation, trust, general partnership, limited partnership, or association, nor their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor any surety, guarantor, endorser, or any other person, firm, partnership, association, trust, or corporation which may become liable, in whole or in part, for the payment of the debt and interest agreed to be paid thereon in accordance with the terms hereof, or any extension, amendment, or renewal thereof, may raise or claim the defense or benefit of the usury laws or any other law prescribing, regulating, or limiting such rate or rates of interest.
    • statuteAla. Code § 8-8-5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (c) The term “original principal balance,” as used herein, shall include the total principal amount of indebtedness incurred or contracted for in a loan, forbearance of money, credit sales, or in a single issue or sale of bonds, debentures, promissory notes, or like transaction, without regard either to the face amount or denomination of any bond, debenture, note, or other evidence of indebtedness constituting a part of such issue or sale, or to the amount of the initial or any subsequent advance pursuant to such loan, forbearance, or credit sales. The term “interest” as used herein shall include all direct or indirect charges imposed as an incident to a loan, forbearance of money, or credit sales. (d) This section shall apply to any person or entity, whether or not organized for profit, and to transactions both prior to and after default, but shall not apply to any agreement involving the loan or forbearance of money or credit sales where the original principal balance is less than $2,000.
    • statuteAla. Code § 8-8-12enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) Except as otherwise permitted by law, all contracts for the payment of interest upon the loan or forbearance of goods, money, things in action, or upon any contract whatever at a higher rate than is prescribed in this chapter are usurious and cannot be enforced except as to the principal. (b) The borrower of money at a usurious rate of interest shall not in any case be required to pay more than the principal sum borrowed, and if any interest has been paid, the same must be deducted from the principal and judgment entered for the balance only; provided, however, that the defense of usury may not be pleaded against a holder in due course of any negotiable instrument.
    • statuteAla. Code § 8-8-1.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) Individuals, partnerships, banks, corporations, and other legal entities may, on any loans or extensions of credit made by them, charge or impose the same rate of interest or finance charge to the same extent and under the same circumstances and conditions as any federal or state chartered or licensed lending institution having its principal place of business in Alabama; provided, however, that any individual or partnership charging or imposing interest or finance charges in excess of that permitted such lending institutions under other applicable law shall be subject to the same penalties prescribed in such other applicable law or laws for such excessive interest or finance charges.
    • statuteAla. Code § 8-8-1.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) The provisions of this section are cumulative and nothing herein contained shall diminish rights or powers otherwise existing. The provisions of this section, as amended, shall have retroactive effect to May 14, 1979, when it became law; provided, however, that there shall be no change of interest rates on secured loans in existence as of April 25, 1980. Any actions taken or contracts made in accordance with the provisions of this section since May 14, 1979 are hereby ratified, validated, and confirmed.
  2. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Does Alaska cap the interest rate this contract can charge?

    Yes, with a size-based exemption. The default legal rate is "10.5 percent a year and no more on money after it is due" (AS 45.45.010(a)). For a contractually agreed rate, the cap is "the greater of 10 percent or five percentage points above the annual rate charged member banks for advances by the 12th Federal Reserve District on the day on which the contract or loan commitment is made", but "[a] contract or loan commitment in which the principal amount exceeds $25,000 is exempt from the limitation of this subsection" (AS 45.45.010(b)).

    The trap

    The $25,000 exemption in (b) is keyed to the PRINCIPAL amount of the contract or loan commitment, not to the aggregate interest that will ultimately be charged: a small-principal, long-term loan stays subject to the rate cap even if total interest paid over time would exceed $25,000. The section's own last subsection then yields to other statutes entirely: "[i]f the limitations on interest rates provided for in this section are inconsistent with the provisions of any other statute covering maximum interest, service charges, or discount rates, then the provisions of the other statute prevail" (AS 45.45.010(h)), so clearing (b) is not the end of the inquiry for a regulated lender or a regulated product. Subsection (f) imposes a SEPARATE and different restriction on certain regulated lenders (a bank, credit union, savings and loan institution, pension fund, insurance company, or mortgage company): none of them "may ... require or accept any percent of ownership or profits above its interest rate," subject to its own carve-outs for large loans ($1,000,000+, five-year+ term) and certain government-sponsored negatively amortizing loans secured by owner-occupied property. Do not conflate the rate-cap exemption in (b) with the equity/profit-participation restriction in (f): a $25,000+ loan can be exempt from the rate cap while the SAME lender, if it is one of the listed regulated institutions, is still barred by (f) from taking an equity or profit share on top of its interest. One more mandatory term sits in the same section and a prepayment-penalty clause cannot drafted around it: "[l]oan contracts and commitments covering one- to four-family dwellings may be prepaid without penalty, except federally insured loans that require a prepayment penalty" (AS 45.45.010(g)).

    as of 2026-09-21

    5 authorities

    • statuteAS 45.45.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The rate of interest in the state is 10.5 percent a year and no more on money after it is due except as provided in (b) of this section.
    • statuteAS 45.45.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Interest may not be charged by express agreement of the parties in a contract or loan commitment that is more than the greater of 10 percent or five percentage points above the annual rate charged member banks for advances by the 12th Federal Reserve District on the day on which the contract or loan commitment is made. A contract or loan commitment in which the principal amount exceeds $25,000 is exempt from the limitation of this subsection.
    • statuteAS 45.45.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A bank, credit union, savings and loan institution, pension fund, insurance company, or mortgage company may not require or accept any percent of ownership or profits above its interest rate. This subsection does not apply to a loan if the principal amount of the loan is $1,000,000 or more and the term of the loan is five years or more, or to a negatively amortizing loan secured by owner-occupied real property originated under a program approved or sponsored by (1) the federal government, including congressionally chartered national corporations; or (2) the state if (A) the real property that secures the loan is not subject to forced sale provided the owner has not violated the terms of the loan agreement including terms regarding (i) payment of property taxes; (ii) payment of hazard or fire insurance premiums; (iii) keeping the property in reasonable repair; (iv) not vacating the property for a period longer than 12 months; (B) the owner may not be evicted from the real property that secures the loan unless a term of the loan agreement regarding a matter listed in (A)(i) — (iv) of this paragraph has been violated; (C) neither the estate nor any heir of the former owner may be compelled to pay a deficiency judgment related to the loan; and (D) the estate or an heir of the former owner has a right of first refusal and may either pay off the loan balance in full, if the former owner had equity in the property, or pay a sum not to exceed 95 percent of the value of the property at the time of exercise of the right of first refusal as determined by an independent real estate appraiser licensed under AS 08.87 .
    • statuteAS 45.45.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Loan contracts and commitments covering one- to four-family dwellings may be prepaid without penalty, except federally insured loans that require a prepayment penalty.
    • statuteAS 45.45.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      If the limitations on interest rates provided for in this section are inconsistent with the provisions of any other statute covering maximum interest, service charges, or discount rates, then the provisions of the other statute prevail.
  3. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is this interest rate usurious in California?

    It depends on who made or arranged the loan as much as on the rate, and the rate itself is in the Constitution. The essential elements of usury are: (1) the transaction must be a loan or forbearance; (2) the interest to be paid must exceed the statutory maximum; (3) the loan and interest must be absolutely repayable by the borrower; and (4) the lender must have a willful intent to enter into a usurious transaction (Ghirardo). In Ghirardo itself the FIRST element decided the case: the restructuring was neither a loan nor a forbearance, the prerequisite to the usury law, because it was a modification of a credit sale, and the modification retained the credit sale's exemption, so the usury law did not apply at all. The constitutional rate limits do not apply at all to a loan, or a forbearance, extension or modification of a loan, made or ARRANGED by a person licensed as a California real estate broker and secured, directly or collaterally, in whole or in part by liens on real property (Civ. Code § 1916.1). Article XV, section 1 sets the ceiling: absent a written contract the rate is 7 percent; by written contract, a loan or forbearance for use primarily for personal, family or household purposes may bear up to 10 percent per annum (a loan whose proceeds go primarily to the purchase, construction or improvement of real property is deemed not to be such a use), and any other loan or forbearance up to the higher of 10 percent or 5 percent plus the rate prevailing on the 25th day of the month preceding the earlier of the contract date or the funding date, as established by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on advances to member banks. No one may take more than that "by charging any fee, bonus, commission, discount or other compensation". And the section itself lists the EXEMPT CLASSES: building and loan associations, industrial loan companies, credit unions, licensed pawnbrokers and personal property brokers, loans made or arranged by a licensed real estate broker and secured by liens on real property, banks under the Bank Act or any law of this state or the United States, agricultural cooperative associations and marketing partnerships, borrowers from a federal intermediate credit bank, "any other class of persons authorized by statute", and any successor in interest to an exempted loan or forbearance, so the list is not closed, which is why the same rate is lawful from a bank and usurious from a private lender.

    The trap

    The exemption, not the rate, can decide the California usury question, and it turns on a fact outside the note: a loan secured by real property and made or ARRANGED by a licensed real estate broker is outside the constitutional limits, where 'arranged' covers a broker acting for compensation or in expectation of compensation in soliciting, negotiating or arranging it, and 'made or arranged' includes a loan made by the broker as principal whether or not acting within the scope of the licence (§ 1916.1, second and third sentences). The identical rate can therefore be lawful or unlawful depending on how the deal was sourced. On intent, Ghirardo explains, quoting earlier authority, that the intent required is to take the interest received, not a conscious attempt, with knowledge of the law, to evade it. The number most people quote, 10 percent, is only the personal, family and household ceiling; a business loan's ceiling floats with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco's rate on advances to member banks and is the higher of that plus 5 percent or 10 percent, and a real-property purchase or construction loan is constitutionally deemed NOT a personal-purpose loan even to a consumer. The constitutional section and Civ. Code § 1916.1 are cited here, but not the uncodified 1919 Usury Law (Civ. Code §§ 1916-1 to 1916-3), so the treble-damages remedy and its limitation period are not stated here.

    as of 2026-09-16

    9 authorities

    • case8 Cal. 4th 791Ghirardo v. AntonioliCal.decided 1994read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The essential elements of usury are: (1) The transaction must be a loan or forbearance; (2) the interest to be paid must exceed the statutory maximum; (3) the loan and interest must be absolutely repayable by the borrower; and (4) the lender must have a willful intent to enter into a usurious transaction.
    • statuteCal. Civ. Code § 1916.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The restrictions upon rates of interest contained in Section 1 of Article XV of the California Constitution shall not apply to any loan, or any forbearance, extension, or modification of a loan, made or arranged by any person licensed as a real estate broker by the State of California, and secured, directly or collaterally, in whole or in part by liens on real property.
    • statuteCal. Const. art. XV, § 1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The rate of interest upon the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action, or on accounts after demand, shall be 7 percent per annum but it shall be competent for the parties to any loan or forbearance of any money, goods or things in action to contract in writing for a rate of interest: (1) For any loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action, if the money, goods, or things in action are for use primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, at a rate not exceeding 10 percent per annum; provided, however, that any loan or forbearance of any money, goods or things in action the proceeds of which are used primarily for the purchase, construction or improvement of real property shall not be deemed to be a use primarily for personal, family or household purposes; or (2) For any loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action for any use other than specified in paragraph (1), at a rate not exceeding the higher of (a) 10 percent per annum or (b) 5 percent per annum plus the rate prevailing on the 25th day of the month preceding the earlier of (i) the date of execution of the contract to make the loan or forbearance, or (ii) the date of making the loan or forbearance established by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on advances to member banks under Sections 13 and 13a of the Federal Reserve Act as now in effect or hereafter from time to time amended (or if there is no such single determinable rate of advances, the closest counterpart of such rate as shall be designated by the Superintendent of Banks of the State of California unless some other person or agency is delegated such authority by the Legislature).
    • statuteCal. Const. art. XV, § 1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No person, association, copartnership or corporation shall by charging any fee, bonus, commission, discount or other compensation receive from a borrower more than the interest authorized by this section upon any loan or forbearance of any money, goods or things in action. However, none of the above restrictions shall apply to any obligations of, loans made by, or forbearances of, any building and loan association as defined in and which is operated under that certain act known as the “Building and Loan Association Act,” approved May 5, 1931, as amended, or to any corporation incorporated in the manner prescribed in and operating under that certain act entitled “An act defining industrial loan companies, providing for their incorporation, powers and supervision,” approved May 18, 1917, as amended, or any corporation incorporated in the manner prescribed in and operating under that certain act entitled “An act defining credit unions, providing for their incorporation, powers, management and supervision,” approved March 31, 1927, as amended or any duly licensed pawnbroker or personal property broker, or any loans made or arranged by any person licensed as a real estate broker by the State of California and secured in whole or in part by liens on real property, or any bank as defined in and operating under that certain act known as the “Bank Act,” approved March 1, 1909, as amended, or any bank created and operating under and pursuant to any laws of this State or of the United States of America or any nonprofit cooperative association organized under Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 54001) of Division 20 of the Food and Agricultural Code in loaning or advancing money in connection with any activity mentioned in said title or any corporation, association, syndicate, joint stock company, or partnership engaged exclusively in the business of marketing agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, dairy, live stock, poultry and bee products on a cooperative nonprofit basis in loaning or advancing money to the members thereof or in connection with any such business or any corporation securing money or credit from any federal intermediate credit bank, organized and existing pursuant to the provisions of an act of Congress entitled “Agricultural Credits Act of 1923,” as amended in loaning or advancing credit so secured, or any other class of persons authorized by statute, or to any successor in interest to any loan or forbearance exempted under this article, nor shall any such charge of any said exempted classes of persons be considered in any action or for any purpose as increasing or affecting or as connected with the rate of interest hereinbefore fixed. The Legislature may from time to time prescribe the maximum rate per annum of, or provide for the supervision, or the filing of a schedule of, or in any manner fix, regulate or limit, the fees, bonuses, commissions, discounts or other compensation which all or any of the said exempted classes of persons may charge or receive from a borrower in connection with any loan or forbearance of any money, goods or things in action. The rate of interest upon a judgment rendered in any court of this State shall be set by the Legislature at not more than 10 percent per annum. Such rate may be variable and based upon interest rates charged by federal agencies or economic indicators, or both. In the absence of the setting of such rate by the Legislature, the rate of interest on any judgment rendered in any court of the State shall be 7 percent per annum. The provisions of this section shall supersede all provisions of this Constitution and laws enacted thereunder in conflict therewith.
    • statuteCal. Civ. Code § 1916.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The term “made or arranged” includes any loan, or any forbearance, extension, or modification of a loan, made by a person licensed as a real estate broker as a principal or as an agent for others, and whether or not the person is acting within the course and scope of such license.
    • statuteCal. Civ. Code § 1916.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      For purposes of this section, a loan, or forbearance, extension, or modification of a loan, is arranged by a person licensed as a real estate broker when a broker (1) acts for compensation or in expectation of compensation for soliciting, negotiating, or arranging the loan, or forbearance, extension, or modification of the loan, for another, (2) acts for compensation or in expectation of compensation for selling, buying, leasing, exchanging, or negotiating the sale, purchase, lease, or exchange of real property or a business for another and (A) arranges a loan to pay all or any portion of the purchase price of, or of an improvement to, that property or business or (B) arranges a forbearance, extension, modification, or refinancing of any loan in connection with that sale, purchase, lease, exchange of, or an improvement to, real property or a business, or (3) arranges or negotiates for another a forbearance, extension, modification, or refinancing of any loan secured by real property in connection with a past transaction in which a broker had acted for compensation or in expectation of compensation for selling, buying, leasing, exchanging, or negotiating the sale, purchase, lease, or exchange of real property or a business.
    • case8 Cal. 4th 791Ghirardo v. Antoniolidecided 1994read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The element of intent is narrow. “[T]he intent sufficient to support the judgment [of usury] does not require a conscious attempt, with knowledge of the law, to evade it. The conscious and voluntary taking of more than the legal rate of interest constitutes usury and the only intent necessary on the part of the lender is to take the amount of interest which he receives; if that amount is more than the law allows, the offense is complete.” (Thomas v. Hunt Mfg. Co. (1954) 42 Cal.2d 734, 740 [ 269 P.2d 12 ].) Intent is relevant, however, in determining the true purpose of the transaction in question because “. . . the trier of fact must look to the substance of the transaction rather than to its form. . . . ‘[I]t is for the trier of the fact to determine whether the intent of the contracting parties was that disclosed by the form adopted, or whether such form was a mere sham and subterfuge to cover up a usurious transaction.’ ”
    • case8 Cal. 4th 791Ghirardo v. AntonioliCal.decided 1994read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      As we shall explain, we hold the usury law does not apply to this debt restructuring because there was no loan or forbearance, the prerequisite to application of the usury law. The transaction was a modification of a credit sale that was not subject to the usury proscription. The modification retained the exemption.
    • case8 Cal. 4th 791Ghirardo v. AntonioliCal.decided 1994read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Disposition The judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed. This matter is remanded to the Court of Appeal for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
  4. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What rate cap applies to a Connecticut loan, and what happens if the lender exceeds it?

    No person, firm or corporation other than a pawnbroker as provided in § 21-44 may loan money and charge, or agree to receive, interest greater than twelve per cent per annum (§ 37-4), and 'No action shall be brought to recover principal or interest, or any part thereof' on a loan prohibited by §§ 37-4 to 37-6, or on any cause arising from its negotiation (§ 37-8): the bar reaches principal as well as interest. Section 37-9 lists loans the cap does not affect, including loans by any bank as defined in § 36a-2, by an out-of-state bank that maintains a branch in Connecticut, by a wholly-owned subsidiary of either (except a loan for consumer purposes) and by Connecticut or federal credit unions; any bona fide mortgage of real property for a sum over $5,000; commercial loans over $10,000 up to $250,000 at not more than the deposit index plus seventeen per cent, and, for advances under a revolving loan agreement, where the total principal then owing to the lender is in that band; and commercial loans over $250,000 with no rate limit in the text, likewise measured by the total principal then owing for revolving advances. In Ferrigno the court held § 37-9(3) exempts a bona fide real estate mortgage LOAN over $5,000, so a deficiency judgment may be had on it despite an interest rate over twelve per cent; the court overruled Atlas Realty to the extent that decision read the term “mortgage” in § 37-9 (3) as the conveyance only, and the judgment of the Appellate Court was affirmed.

    The trap

    The penalty reaches principal: § 37-8 bars an action to recover 'principal or interest, or any part thereof' on a prohibited loan, so an unsecured private loan above twelve per cent to an individual can be uncollectable in full. § 37-9 leaves one route open: 'No provision of this section shall prevent any such bank, out-of-state bank, Connecticut credit union or federal credit union or other lender from recovering by an action at law the amount of the principal and the interest stipulated or interest at the legal rate, if interest is not stipulated, in any negotiable instrument which it has acquired for value and in good faith without notice of illegality in the consideration.' The business-loan exemptions in § 37-9(4) depend on facts, not labels: a borrower 'engaged primarily in commercial, manufacturing, industrial or nonconsumer pursuits' whose funds are used in its business and not for consumer purposes. A loan to an individual for consumer purposes is outside them. 'Interest' for § 37-9 does not include attorney's fees, title search, closing, survey or recording fees paid by the borrower, but § 37-6 counts expenses of inquiry into the borrower's financial responsibility and of negotiating the loan toward the twelve per cent.

    as of 2026-09-16

    11 authorities

    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No person and no firm or corporation or agent thereof, other than a pawnbroker as provided in section 21-44 , shall, as guarantor or otherwise, directly or indirectly, loan money to any person and, directly or indirectly, charge, demand, accept or make any agreement to receive therefor interest at a rate greater than twelve per cent per annum.
    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-8enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No action shall be brought to recover principal or interest, or any part thereof, on any loan prohibited by sections 37-4 , 37-5 and 37-6 , or upon any cause arising from the negotiation of such loan.
    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The provisions of sections 37-4 , 37-5 and 37-6 shall not affect: (1) Any loan made prior to September 12, 1911; (2) any loan made by (A) any bank, as defined in section 36a-2 , or any out-of-state bank, as defined in section 36a-2 , that maintains in this state a branch, as defined in section 36a-410 , (B) any wholly-owned subsidiary of such bank or out-of-state bank, except a loan for consumer purposes, or (C) any Connecticut credit union, as defined in section 36a-2 , or federal credit union, as defined in section 36a-2
    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (3) any bona fide mortgage of real property for a sum in excess of five thousand dollars
    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (B) any loan made to a foreign or domestic corporation, statutory trust, limited liability company, general, limited or limited liability partnership or association organized for a profit or any individual, provided such corporation, trust, company, partnership, association or individual is engaged primarily in commercial, manufacturing, industrial or nonconsumer pursuits and provided further that the funds received by such corporation, trust, company, partnership, association or individual are utilized in such entity's business or investment activities and are not utilized for consumer purposes and provided further that the original indebtedness to be repaid is in excess of two hundred fifty thousand dollars, or, in the case of one or more advances of money of less than two hundred fifty thousand dollars made pursuant to a revolving loan agreement or similar agreement or a loan agreement providing for the making of advances to the borrower from time to time up to an aggregate maximum amount, the total principal amount of all loans owing by the borrower to the lender at the time of any such advance is in excess of two hundred fifty thousand dollars;
    • case244 Conn. 189Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development AssociatesConn.decided 1998read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      We conclude that § 37-9 (3) exempts a bona fide real estate mortgage loan of over $5000 from the purview of § 37-4 and consequently permits a deficiency judgment on such a loan with an interest rate in excess of 12 percent per annum.
    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-6enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No person and no firm or corporation, or agent thereof, shall charge a borrower with any expense of inquiry as to his financial responsibility or expense of negotiating a loan, or charge, at the time of making the loan, the expense of collecting the interest and principal of the loan, unless the total of such charges and of the interest agreed upon is, during any one year, twelve per cent of the loan or less.
    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (4) (A) any loan, carrying an annual interest rate of not more than the deposit index, as determined under section 36a-26 , for the calendar year in which the loan is made plus seventeen per cent, made to a foreign or domestic corporation, statutory trust, limited liability company, general, limited or limited liability partnership or association organized for a profit or any individual, provided such corporation, trust, company, partnership, association or individual is engaged primarily in commercial, manufacturing, industrial or nonconsumer pursuits and provided further that the funds received by such corporation, trust, company, partnership, association or individual are utilized in such entity's business or investment activities and are not utilized for consumer purposes and provided further that the original indebtedness to be repaid is in excess of ten thousand dollars but less than or equal to two hundred fifty thousand dollars, or, in the case of one or more advances of money of less than ten thousand dollars made pursuant to a revolving loan agreement or similar agreement or a loan agreement providing for the making of advances to the borrower from time to time up to an aggregate maximum amount, the total principal amount of all loans owing by the borrower to the lender at the time of any such advance is in excess of ten thousand dollars but less than or equal to two hundred fifty thousand dollars
    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      For the purpose of this section: “Interest” shall not be construed to include attorney's fees, including preparation of mortgage deed and note, security agreements, title search, waivers and closing fees, survey charges or recording fees paid by the mortgagor or borrower; and “consumer purposes” means the utilization of funds for personal, family or household purchases, acquisitions or uses.
    • statuteConn. Gen. Stat. § 37-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No provision of this section shall prevent any such bank, out-of-state bank, Connecticut credit union or federal credit union or other lender from recovering by an action at law the amount of the principal and the interest stipulated or interest at the legal rate, if interest is not stipulated, in any negotiable instrument which it has acquired for value and in good faith without notice of illegality in the consideration.
    • case244 Conn. 189Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development AssociatesConn.decided 1998read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      To the extent that this court’s decision in Atlas Realty Corp. indicated that the term “mortgage” in § 37-9 (3) refers only to the mortgage conveyance and not to the mortgage loan, that decision is overruled. We conclude, therefore, that the defense of usury is not available to the defendants because § 37-9 (3) exempts the secured loan, not only the mortgage conveyance securing the loan, from the operation of § 37-4. The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.
  5. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is there an interest-rate ceiling on this Delaware loan, and what happens if it is exceeded?

    The ceiling is a floating one: a lender may charge and collect interest at any rate agreed upon in writing not in excess of 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate including any surcharge, and where no contract rate is expressed the legal rate is 5% over that discount rate. That ceiling is Chapter 23's general rule, and it has three large exits. There is no ceiling where the amount loaned or used exceeds $100,000 and repayment is not secured by a mortgage against the borrower's principal residence. A bank's revolving credit plan may charge periodic interest at whatever rate the agreement provides (5 Del. C. § 943), and a lender licensed under Chapter 22 of Title 5 may likewise charge the agreed rate (5 Del. C. § 2229), so the cap does not price a bank's revolving credit plan or a Title 5 licensee's loan, but § 2302 expressly subjects every bank loan contract to § 2301, so an ordinary bank term loan is still capped; § 2305 leaves a bona fide holder of negotiable paper untouched, and § 2307 takes international banking facility credit out of this chapter and every other Delaware rate law. And no corporation, limited partnership, statutory or business trust, limited liability company, or association or joint stock company with corporate powers may interpose the defense of usury in any action (§ 2306): the remedies described below belong, in practice, to individual borrowers. Usury is charging a borrower, directly or indirectly, a higher rate than the law permits; the borrower need not pay the excess over the lawful rate and may deduct it from the debt, and a borrower who has paid the whole debt with unlawful interest may recover three times the interest collected in excess of the lawful rate, or $500, whichever is greater, in an action brought within 1 year of payment.

    The trap

    Four Delaware-specific edges. The cap governs less than it appears to: entity borrowers cannot interpose usury as a defence (§ 2306; whether the § 2304(b) claw-back action is also barred is not settled by the text), and bank revolving credit and licensed lenders charge the agreed rate, so the ceiling matters mainly for an individual borrowing under $100,000 (or on a home-secured loan) from a non-bank, unlicensed lender. First, the cap moves: it is pegged to the Federal Reserve discount rate rather than to a fixed percentage, and where no contract rate is expressed the legal rate is fixed 'as of the time from which interest is due'. Second, above $100,000 unsecured by a mortgage on a borrower's principal residence Chapter 23 imposes no rate limit (the subsection disapplies only 'any other provision in this chapter'). Third, the claw-back has a hard 1-year clock from payment, far shorter than the general 3-year contract period. Separately, a partner's obligation to a limited partnership or its partners arising under the partnership agreement (6 Del. C. § 17-505), and a member's or manager's obligation to an LLC or its members or managers arising under the LLC agreement (§ 18-505), is not subject to the defence of usury: a rule about capital calls and similar internal obligations, not about loans to the entity from outside lenders.

    as of 2026-09-17

    15 authorities

    • statute6 Del. C. § 2301enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) Any lender may charge and collect from a borrower interest at any rate agreed upon in writing not in excess of 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate including any surcharge thereon.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2301enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (c) Notwithstanding any other provision in this chapter to the contrary, there shall be no limitation on the rate of interest which may be legally charged for the loan or use of money, where the amount of money loaned or used exceeds $100,000, and where repayment thereof is not secured by a mortgage against the principal residence of any borrower.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2304enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) When a rate of interest for the loan or use of money exceeding that established by law has been reserved or contracted for, the borrower or debtor shall not be required to pay the creditor the excess over the lawful rate and the borrower or debtor may, at the borrower’s or debtor’s option, retain and deduct the excess from the amount of any debt. In all cases where any borrower or debtor has paid the whole debt or sum loaned, together with interest exceeding the lawful rate, the borrower or debtor, or a personal representative, may recover in an action against the person who has taken or received the debt and interest, or the personal representative, the sum of 3 times the amount of interest collected on any loan in excess of that permitted by law or the sum of $500, whichever is greater, if such action is brought within 1 year after the time of such payment.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2306enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No corporation, limited partnership, statutory trust, business trust or limited liability company, and no association or joint stock company having any of the powers and privileges of corporations not possessed by individuals or partnerships, shall interpose the defense of usury in any action.
    • statute5 Del. C. § 943enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A bank may charge and collect periodic interest under a revolving credit plan on outstanding unpaid indebtedness in the borrower’s account under the plan at such daily, weekly, monthly, annual or other periodic percentage rate or rates as the agreement governing the plan provides or as established in the manner provided in the agreement governing the plan.
    • statute5 Del. C. § 2229enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A licensee may charge and collect interest in respect of a loan at such daily, weekly, monthly, annual or other periodic percentage rate or rates as the agreement governing the loan provides or as established in the manner provided in such agreement and may calculate such interest by way of simple interest or such other method as the agreement governing the loan provides.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 17-505enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No obligation of a partner of a limited partnership to the limited partnership, or to a partner of the limited partnership, arising under the partnership agreement or a separate agreement or writing, and no note, instrument or other writing evidencing any such obligation of a partner, shall be subject to the defense of usury, and no partner shall interpose the defense of usury with respect to any such obligation in any action.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 18-505enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No obligation of a member or manager of a limited liability company to the limited liability company, or to a member or manager of the limited liability company, arising under the limited liability company agreement or a separate agreement or writing, and no note, instrument or other writing evidencing any such obligation of a member or manager, shall be subject to the defense of usury, and no member or manager shall interpose the defense of usury with respect to any such obligation in any action.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2301enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Where there is no expressed contract rate, the legal rate of interest shall be 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate including any surcharge as of the time from which interest is due; provided, that where the time from which interest is due predates April 18, 1980, the legal rate shall remain as it was at such time. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, any judgment entered on agreements governed by this subsection, whether the contract rate is expressed or not, shall, from the date of the judgment, bear post-judgment interest of 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate including any surcharge thereon or the contract rate, whichever is less.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2304enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) Usury is the charge to a borrower by a lender, directly or indirectly, of a higher rate of interest than that permitted by law.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2305enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Nothing in this chapter shall affect the holders of negotiable paper taken bona fide in the usual course of business.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2302enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Every contract for the loan or advance of money by banking corporations, within this State, shall be subject to § 2301 of this title. In any case where loans or advances of money, made by banking corporations or otherwise, repayable on demand to an amount not less than $5,000, are made upon warehouse receipts, bills of lading, certificates of stock, certificates of deposit, bills of exchange, bonds, or other negotiable instruments, pledged as collateral security for such repayment, any sum agreed upon, in writing, by the parties to the transaction may be received, or contracted to be received, and collected as compensation for making the advances.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2301enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) If the rate of interest specifically set forth in any bond, note or other evidence of indebtedness, exclusive of other charges, fees or discounts authorized or permitted under federal law or under any rule or regulation promulgated pursuant thereto, does not exceed the lawful rate prescribed in subsection (a) of this section, no person shall, by way of defense or otherwise, avail himself or herself of any of the provisions of this chapter, to avoid or defeat the payment of any interest or any such charges, fees or discounts, which any such person shall have contracted to pay in respect of any loan insured by the Federal Housing Administration, or the Commissioner thereof, under or pursuant to the provisions of the National Housing Act [12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq.], approved June 27, 1934, and amendments thereto, or guaranteed by the Veterans Administration, or the administrator thereof, under and pursuant to Title 38 of the United States Code [38 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq.], and amendments thereto; nor shall anything contained in this chapter be construed to prevent recovery of any such interest or any such charges, fees or discounts from any person who shall have contracted to pay the same.
    • statute6 Del. C. § 2307enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This chapter and any other law of this State limiting the rate or amount of interest, discount, points, finance charges, service charges or other charges which may be charged, taken, collected, received or reserved shall not apply to any international banking facility extension of credit, as such terms are contained in § 101 of Title 5.
    • statute10 Del. C. § 8106enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      § 8106. Actions subject to 3-year limitation. (a) No action to recover damages for trespass, no action to regain possession of personal chattels, no action to recover damages for the detention of personal chattels, no action to recover a debt not evidenced by a record or by an instrument under seal, no action based on a detailed statement of the mutual demands in the nature of debit and credit between parties arising out of contractual or fiduciary relations, no action based on a promise, no action based on a statute, and no action to recover damages caused by an injury unaccompanied with force or resulting indirectly from the act of the defendant shall be brought after the expiration of 3 years from the accruing of the cause of such action; subject, however, to the provisions of §§ 8108-8110, 8119 and 8127 of this title.
  6. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What is the exposure if this agreement's interest rate turns out to be over the Florida limit?

    Florida's ceiling is tiered by size. Under Fla. Stat. § 687.02(1) a contract for interest above the equivalent of 18 percent per annum simple interest is usurious. The subsection has its own reach: § 687.02(2) applies the amendment that produced it only to loans, advances of credit or lines of credit made on or after July 1, 1979, and to earlier ones where the lender has the legal right to require full payment or to adjust or modify the rate by renewal, assumption, reaffirmation, contract or otherwise. If the loan, advance, line of credit, forbearance or obligation exceeds $500,000, the contract is usurious only if the rate exceeds the rate prescribed in § 687.071. There, willfully and knowingly charging, taking or receiving interest above 25 percent (up to 45 percent) is a second-degree misdemeanour, and above 45 percent a third-degree felony. The civil penalty under § 687.04 falls on a person WILLFULLY violating § 687.03: forfeiture of the entire interest charged or contracted for, with only the actual principal enforceable, and, where usurious interest was taken, reserved or paid, forfeiture to the borrower of double that interest. Those penalties do not apply if, before the borrower sues, pleads usury or gives written notice, the lender notifies the borrower, refunds the overcharge with interest and adjusts the account (§ 687.04(2)). Under § 687.071(7) no extension of credit made in violation of the criminal usury section is an enforceable debt in Florida's courts. The four requisites of a usurious transaction include a corrupt intent to take more than the legal rate for the use of the money loaned (Dixon v. Sharp).

    The trap

    Usury in Florida is not arithmetic alone. The fourth requisite is a corrupt intent to take more than the legal rate, and Dixon v. Sharp addressed whether intent could be established by mathematical computation alone. The opinion quotes a district court's statement that, in its own words, the difference between a lawful transaction and a usurious one is the difference between "good faith" and "bad faith", gathered from all the circumstances. That is a defence for the lender who miscalculated, and a burden for the borrower who has only the rate, and in Dixon the lenders won: the Court held the Fourth District erred in affirming a judgment that found the requisite intent from the mathematical consequences of the agreement alone, quashed that decision, and directed that the trial court's judgment in the lenders' favour be reinstated, over two dissents. The other trap is the § 687.04(2) safe harbour, which only works if the lender acts BEFORE the borrower sues, pleads usury or gives written notice.

    as of 2026-09-16

    12 authorities

    • statuteFla. Stat. § 687.02enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (1) All contracts for the payment of interest upon any loan, advance of money, line of credit, or forbearance to enforce the collection of any debt, or upon any obligation whatever, at a higher rate of interest than the equivalent of 18 percent per annum simple interest are hereby declared usurious. However, if such loan, advance of money, line of credit, forbearance to enforce the collection of a debt, or obligation exceeds $500,000 in amount or value, then no contract to pay interest thereon is usurious unless the rate of interest exceeds the rate prescribed in s. 687.071.
    • statuteFla. Stat. § 687.04enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any person, or any agent, officer, or other representative of any person, willfully violating the provisions of s. 687.03 shall forfeit the entire interest so charged, or contracted to be charged or reserved, and only the actual principal sum of such usurious contract can be enforced in any court in this state, either at law or in equity; and when said usurious interest is taken or reserved, or has been paid, then and in that event the person who has taken or reserved, or has been paid, either directly or indirectly, such usurious interest shall forfeit to the party from whom such usurious interest has been reserved, taken, or exacted in any way double the amount of interest so reserved, taken, or exacted.
    • statuteFla. Stat. § 687.04enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      However, the penalties provided for by this section shall not apply: (1) To a bona fide endorsee or transferee of negotiable paper purchased before maturity, unless the usurious character should appear upon its face, or unless the said endorsee or transferee shall have had actual notice of the same before the purchase of such paper, but in such event double the amount of such usurious interest may be recovered after payment, by action against the party originally exacting the same, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state, together with an attorney’s fee, as provided in s. 687.06; or (2) If, prior to the institution of an action by the borrower or the filing of a defense under this chapter by the borrower or receipt of written notice by the lender from the borrower that usury has been charged or collected, the lender notifies the borrower of the usurious overcharge and refunds the amount of any overcharge taken, plus interest on the overcharge taken at the maximum lawful rate in effect at the time the usurious interest was taken, to the borrower and makes whatever adjustments in the appropriate contract or account as are necessary to ensure that the borrower will not be required to pay further interest in excess of the amount permitted by s. 687.03.
    • statuteFla. Stat. § 687.071enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (2) Unless otherwise specifically allowed by law, any person making an extension of credit to any person, who shall willfully and knowingly charge, take, or receive interest thereon at a rate exceeding 25 percent per annum but not in excess of 45 percent per annum, or the equivalent rate for a longer or shorter period of time, whether directly or indirectly, or conspires so to do, commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
    • statuteFla. Stat. § 687.071enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (3) Unless otherwise specifically allowed by law, any person making an extension of credit to any person, who shall willfully and knowingly charge, take, or receive interest thereon at a rate exceeding 45 percent per annum or the equivalent rate for a longer or shorter period of time, whether directly or indirectly or conspire so to do, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
    • statuteFla. Stat. § 687.071enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (7) No extension of credit made in violation of any of the provisions of this section shall be an enforceable debt in the courts of this state.
    • case276 So. 2d 817Dixon v. SharpFla.decided 1973-04-04read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The Four requisites of a usurious transaction are, (1) There must be a loan express or implied; (2) An understanding between the parties that the money lent shall be returned; (3) That for such a loan a greater rate of interest than is allowed by law shall be paid or agreed to be paid, as the case may be; and (4) There must exist a corrupt intent to take more than the legal rate for the use of the money loaned.
    • statuteFla. Stat. § 687.03enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (1) Except as provided herein, it shall be usury and unlawful for any person, or for any agent, officer, or other representative of any person, to reserve, charge, or take for any loan, advance of money, line of credit, forbearance to enforce the collection of any sum of money, or other obligation a rate of interest greater than the equivalent of 18 percent per annum simple interest, either directly or indirectly, by way of commission for advances, discounts, or exchange, or by any contract, contrivance, or device whatever whereby the debtor is required or obligated to pay a sum of money greater than the actual principal sum received, together with interest at the rate of the equivalent of 18 percent per annum simple interest. However, if any loan, advance of money, line of credit, forbearance to enforce the collection of a debt, or obligation exceeds $500,000 in amount or value, it shall not be usury or unlawful to reserve, charge, or take interest thereon unless the rate of interest exceeds the rate prescribed in s. 687.071.
    • case276 So. 2d 817Dixon v. SharpFla.decided 1973-04-04read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      If a mere mathematical computation is determinative of intent then the words "intent" and "willfully and knowingly" have no force or effect and might just as well be deleted from the statute. For the defense of usury to be established, the circumstances surrounding *821 the entire agreement must be proved, and they must be carefully scrutinized by the court.
    • case276 So. 2d 817Dixon v. SharpFla.decided 1973-04-04read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The court explicitly asserted in River Hills, Inc. v. Edwards, Fla.App., 190 So.2d 415, 423 , as follows: "The intent is not fully determined by whether or not the lender actually gets more or charges more than the law permits but by whether or not there was an improper motive in his mind to get more than the legal interest (Clark v. Grey, supra; Stewart v. Nangle, supra; Shaffran v. Holness, Fla.App., 102 So.2d 35 ) at the time the loan agreement is entered and, if usurious at that time, no subsequent transaction will purge it. (Shorr v. Skafte, Fla., 90 So.2d 604 ) The difference between a lawful transaction and usurious one, therefore, is the difference between "good faith" and "bad faith". The parties are permitted to testify as to their purposes and intentions, and the question of intent is to be gathered from the circumstances surrounding the entire transaction.
    • case276 So. 2d 817Dixon v. SharpFla.decided 1973-04-04read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      We find that the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in its decision entered July 24, 1972, reported at 265 So.2d 105 , erred in affirming the Final Judgment of the trial court finding that requisite intent can be determined solely from mathematical consequences of the agreement entered into between the parties. Corrupt intent should be determined from all the circumstances surrounding the transaction rather than being determined by an inflexible rule which measures the mathematical result. The Final Judgment of the trial court entered on September 18, 1970, after hearing testimony of all the witnesses, in favor of the Dixons was a proper disposition of this cause. All subsequent proceedings inconsistent with that judgment were either moot or erroneous. Accordingly, the decision of the District Court of Appeal, herein sought to be reviewed, is quashed and this cause is returned to that court with directions to remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to reinstate the judgment entered by the trial court on September 18, 1970. Beverly Beach Properties v. Nelson, 68 So.2d 604 (page 607) (Fla. 1953). It is so ordered. CARLTON, C.J., and ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion. BOYD, J., dissents with opinion.
    • statuteFla. Stat. § 687.02enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (2) As amended by chapter 79-592, Laws of Florida, chapter 79-274, Laws of Florida, which amended subsection (1):(a) Shall apply only to loans, advances of credit, or lines of credit made on or subsequent to July 1, 1979, and to loans, advances of credit, or lines of credit made prior to that date if the lender has the legal right to require full payment or to adjust or modify the interest rate, by renewal, assumption, reaffirmation, contract, or otherwise; and (b) Shall not be construed as diminishing the force and effect of any laws applying to loans, advances of credit, or lines of credit, other than to those mentioned in paragraph (a), completed prior to July 1, 1979.
  7. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What interest rate applies to money owed under our contract if the contract itself does not fix a rate?

    12% per year, by default, whenever the contract does not fix a different rate in an express written agreement. Idaho Code § 28-22-104(1): "When there is no express contract in writing fixing a different rate of interest, interest is allowed at the rate of twelve cents (12¢) on the hundred by the year" on money due by express contract, money after it becomes due, money lent, money received to another's use and retained beyond a reasonable time, money due on a settled mutual account, and money due on an open account after three months from the last item. A DIFFERENT, separate rate applies once a court enters JUDGMENT: § 28-22-104(2) sets the legal rate on a judgment at "five percent (5%) plus the base rate in effect at the time of entry of the judgment," with the base rate reset annually every July 1 by the state treasurer from the one-year U.S. Treasury constant-maturity yield, rounded up to the nearest 1/8%, and applied on a 365-day-year basis.

    The trap

    The two rates in § 28-22-104 answer two different questions and are not interchangeable: subsection (1)'s 12% is a PRE-JUDGMENT default that a written contract can displace by fixing its own rate; subsection (2)'s 5%-plus-base-rate is the POST-JUDGMENT rate that applies to the judgment itself once entered, and it is set annually by the state treasurer rather than by the parties. Be careful about what subsection (2) does not say: it fixes the legal rate on a judgment and says nothing either way about a contract rate carrying past entry of judgment, so it is not an answer to that question. A contract that is silent on interest, or that fixes a rate only informally (not in an express WRITING), falls back to the 12% default under subsection (1) even if the parties otherwise understood a different rate: the statute's own text requires the different rate to be fixed by an "express contract in writing." Note also that subsection (1)'s open-account rule has its own three-month trigger ("Money due upon open accounts after three (3) months from the date of the last item"): interest on an open account does not start running from the account's inception. One more thing this section is not: a ceiling. Title 28, chapter 22 of the Idaho Code runs to four sections, §§ 28-22-104 through 28-22-107, and the last three are about dishonored checks; none of them caps a rate the parties fix in an express writing. Idaho puts that kind of regulation in its credit code, whose stated purposes include "the law governing installment sales, credit, loans and usury", so a consumer or other regulated-credit transaction has to be checked there and not here.

    as of 2026-09-21

    5 authorities

    • statuteIdaho Code § 28-22-104enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      When there is no express contract in writing fixing a different rate of interest, interest is allowed at the rate of twelve cents (12¢) on the hundred by the year on:
    • statuteIdaho Code § 28-22-104enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      1. Money due by express contract. 2. Money after the same becomes due. 3. Money lent. 4. Money received to the use of another and retained beyond a reasonable time without the owner’s consent, express or implied. 5. Money due on the settlement of mutual accounts from the date the balance is ascertained. 6. Money due upon open accounts after three (3) months from the date of the last item.
    • statuteIdaho Code § 28-22-104enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The legal rate of interest on money due on the judgment of any competent court or tribunal shall be the rate of five percent (5%) plus the base rate in effect at the time of entry of the judgment.
    • statuteIdaho Code § 28-22-104enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The base rate shall be determined on July 1 of each year by the Idaho state treasurer and shall be the weekly average yield on United States treasury securities as adjusted to a constant maturity of one (1) year and rounded up to the nearest one-eighth percent (1/8%). The base rate shall be determined by the Idaho state treasurer utilizing the published interest rates during the second week in June of the year in which such interest is being calculated. The legal rate of interest as announced by the treasurer on July 1 of each year shall operate as the rate applying for the succeeding twelve (12) months to all judgments declared during such succeeding twelve (12) month period. The payment of interest and principal on each judgment shall be calculated according to a three hundred sixty-five (365) day year.
    • statuteIdaho Code § 28-41-102enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (2) The underlying purposes and policies of this act are: (a) To simplify, clarify and modernize the law governing installment sales, credit, loans and usury;
  8. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is this interest rate lawful in Illinois, and what happens if it is not?

    The Interest Act's general ceiling is 9%: except as otherwise provided in Section 4.05, which is a 6% ceiling, "[n]otwithstanding any contrary provision of State law", on interest or finance charges collected from an Illinois service member who has entered military service, or that member's spouse, during the period of military service on an obligation entered into before that service. In all written contracts it is lawful for the parties to stipulate an annual percentage rate of 9% or less upon every $100 of money loaned or in any manner due and owing, 'and after that rate for a greater or less sum, or for a longer or shorter time, except as herein provided' (815 ILCS 205/4(1)); and the maximum rate that may lawfully be contracted for is fixed by the law applicable at the time the contract is made. But it is lawful to charge any rate, except as otherwise provided in the Predatory Loan Prevention Act, on listed transactions that cover most commercial lending (among them any loan to a corporation, any credit transaction between a merchandise wholesaler and retailer, and any business loan to a business association, copartnership, sole proprietor, joint venturers, limited partnership or trustee operating a business), and a state bank or branch of an out-of-state bank may contract for any rate agreed with the borrower (815 ILCS 205/4). On top of that, for consumer lending, the Predatory Loan Prevention Act provides that notwithstanding any other provision of law, for loans made or renewed on or after its effective date a lender shall not contract for or receive charges exceeding a 36% annual percentage rate on the unpaid balance of the amount financed, and that is a ceiling, not a licence, because the same section adds that "[n]othing in this Act shall be construed to permit a person or entity to contract for or receive a charge exceeding that permitted by the Interest Act or other law" (815 ILCS 123/15-5-5), but the PLPA's 'loan' does not include a commercial loan (§ 15-1-10), and banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions and insurance companies are exempt from that Act (§ 15-1-15(c)). A lender who knowingly contracts for or receives unlawful interest by any device or subterfuge owes the obligor twice all interest, discount and charges under the contract or paid, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, and the payments due and to become due under the loan contract "shall be reduced by the amount which the obligor is thus entitled to recover" (815 ILCS 205/6). The Predatory Loan Prevention Act's own reach runs the same way: it applies to any person or entity that offers or makes a loan to an Illinois consumer except as its applicability section otherwise provides, and to anyone "that seeks to evade its applicability by any device, subterfuge, or pretense whatsoever" (815 ILCS 123/15-1-15(a)-(b)); its "lender" is anyone who offers or makes a loan, buys a whole or partial interest in one, arranges one for a third party or acts as a third party's agent in making one, and anyone the Department determines is in substance running a disguised loan or a subterfuge to avoid the Act (§ 15-1-10); and § 15-5-15(a) bars every device, subterfuge or pretence to evade the Act, naming sale-and-leaseback dressing, cash-rebate dressing on a pretextual installment sale, and lending at an over-cap rate by mail, telephone, internet or any electronic means whether or not the lender has a physical location in Illinois. The two Acts punish differently. Under the Interest Act the obligor's affirmative action must be brought within two years after the earlier of the last scheduled payment or full payment, the same recovery is available as a defence "at any time after the loan is transacted", and a bona fide error corrected within a reasonable time is not a violation (815 ILCS 205/6). Under the Predatory Loan Prevention Act a loan made in violation of the Act "is null and void and no person or entity shall have any right to collect, attempt to collect, receive, or retain any principal, fee, interest, or charges related to the loan" (815 ILCS 123/15-5-10), and every violation is also a Consumer Fraud Act violation (§ 15-10-5(b)). Section 205/5 states the general prohibition the double-interest remedy enforces: no one may take for a loan or forbearance any greater sum than the Act or other law expressly authorizes.

    The trap

    Two traps sit in the fine print. First, § 4(1) voids a clause that tries to ratchet: any provision purporting to authorize, contingent upon a change in Illinois law after the contract is made, a rate greater than the maximum lawful rate at the time the contract is made is void, so a clause raising the rate to whatever the law permits from time to time is void as drafted. Second, the business-loan exemption is not available where the loan is secured by an assignment of an individual obligor's salary, wages or commissions, or by household goods, and the PLPA's 36% cap is computed using the military-APR method of 32 C.F.R. § 232.4, which sweeps in fees and charges a nominal rate leaves out. The usury remedy runs on a two-year outside clock for affirmative actions but may be raised as a defence at any time after the loan is transacted. The PLPA polices its own border: if a loan exceeds the 36% cap, a person who holds the predominant economic interest in it, or markets, brokers, arranges or facilitates it and holds a right or first right of refusal to purchase it, is a lender subject to the Act even while purporting to act as agent or service provider for an exempt entity, as is one the totality of the circumstances shows to be the lender, with indemnifying the exempt entity, predominantly designing, controlling or operating the loan programme, and lending directly in other states weighing in favour of that conclusion (§ 15-5-15(b)).

    as of 2026-09-17

    20 authorities

    • statute815 ILCS 205/4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (1) Except as otherwise provided in Section 4.05, in all written contracts it shall be lawful for the parties to stipulate or agree that an annual percentage rate of 9%, or any less sum, shall be taken and paid upon every $100 of money loaned or in any manner due and owing from any person to any other person or corporation in this state, and after that rate for a greater or less sum, or for a longer or shorter time, except as herein provided.
    • statute815 ILCS 205/4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      It is lawful to charge, contract for, and receive any rate or amount of interest or compensation, except as otherwise provided in the Predatory Loan Prevention Act, with respect to the following transactions: (a) Any loan made to a corporation;
    • statute815 ILCS 205/4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (c) Any credit transaction between a merchandise wholesaler and retailer; any business loan to a business association or copartnership or to a person owning and operating a business as sole proprietor or to any persons owning and operating a business as joint venturers, joint tenants or tenants in common, or to any limited partnership, or to any trustee owning and operating a business or whose beneficiaries own and operate a business, except that any loan which is secured (1) by an assignment of an individual obligor's salary, wages, commissions or other compensation for services, or (2) by his household furniture or other goods used for his personal, family or household purposes shall be deemed not to be a loan within the meaning of this subsection;
    • statute815 ILCS 205/4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      It is lawful for a state bank or a branch of an out-of-state bank, as those terms are defined in Section 2 of the Illinois Banking Act, to receive or to contract to receive and collect interest and charges at any rate or rates agreed upon by the bank or branch and the borrower.
    • statute815 ILCS 205/4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The maximum rate of interest that may lawfully be contracted for is determined by the law applicable thereto at the time the contract is made. Any provision in any contract, whether made before or after July 1, 1969, which provides for or purports to authorize, contingent upon a change in the Illinois law after the contract is made, any rate of interest greater than the maximum lawful rate at the time the contract is made, is void.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-5-5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for loans made or renewed on and after the effective date of this Act, a lender shall not contract for or receive charges exceeding a 36% annual percentage rate on the unpaid balance of the amount financed for a loan. For purposes of this Section, the annual percentage rate shall be calculated as such rate is calculated using the system for calculating a military annual percentage rate under Section 232.4 of Title 32 of the Code of Federal Regulations as in effect on the effective date of this Act.
    • statute815 ILCS 205/6enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      If any person or corporation knowingly contracts for or receives, directly or indirectly, by any device, subterfuge or other means, unlawful interest, discount or charges for or in connection with any loan of money, the obligor may, recover by means of an action or defense an amount equal to twice the total of all interest, discount and charges determined by the loan contract or paid by the obligor, whichever is greater, plus such reasonable attorney's fees and court costs as may be assessed by a court against the lender.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-1-10enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      "Loan" means money or credit provided to a consumer in exchange for the consumer's agreement to a certain set of terms, including, but not limited to, any finance charges, interest, or other conditions. "Loan" includes closed-end and open-end credit, retail installment sales contracts, motor vehicle retail installment sales contracts, and any transaction conducted via any medium whatsoever, including, but not limited to, paper, facsimile, Internet, or telephone. "Loan" does not include a commercial loan.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-1-15enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (c) Banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, and insurance companies organized, chartered, or holding a certificate of authority to do business under the laws of this State or any other state or under the laws of the United States are exempt from the provisions of this Act.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-5-15enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) If a loan exceeds the rate permitted by Section 15-5-5, a person or entity is a lender subject to the requirements of this Act notwithstanding the fact that the person or entity purports to act as an agent, service provider, or in another capacity for another entity that is exempt from this Act, if, among other things: (1) the person or entity holds, acquires, or maintains, directly or indirectly, the predominant economic interest in the loan; or (2) the person or entity markets, brokers, arranges, or facilitates the loan and holds the right, requirement, or first right of refusal to purchase loans, receivables, or interests in the loans; or (3) the totality of the circumstances indicate that the person or entity is the lender and the transaction is structured to evade the requirements of this Act. Circumstances that weigh in favor of a person or entity being a lender include, without limitation, where the person or entity: (i) indemnifies, insures, or protects an exempt person or entity for any costs or risks related to the loan; (ii) predominantly designs, controls, or operates the loan program; or (iii) purports to act as an agent, service provider, or in another capacity for an exempt entity while acting directly as a lender in other states.
    • statute815 ILCS 205/6enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Recovery by means of a defense may be had at any time after the loan is transacted. Recovery by means of an action may be had at any time after the loan is transacted and prior to the expiration of 2 years after the earlier of (1) the date of the last scheduled payment of the loan after giving effect to all renewals or extensions thereof, if any, or (2) the date on which the total amount due under the terms of the loan contract is fully paid. A bona fide error in connection with a loan shall not be a violation under this section if the lender corrects the error within a reasonable time.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-5-10enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Sec. 15-5-10. Violation. Any loan made in violation of this Act is null and void and no person or entity shall have any right to collect, attempt to collect, receive, or retain any principal, fee, interest, or charges related to the loan.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-10-5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) Any violation of this Act, including the commission of an act prohibited under Article 5, constitutes a violation of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
    • statute815 ILCS 205/5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No person or corporation shall directly or indirectly accept or receive, in money, goods, discounts or thing in action, or in any other way, any greater sum or greater value for the loan, forbearance or discount of any money, goods or thing in action, than is expressly authorized by this Act or other laws of this State.
    • statute815 ILCS 205/4.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) Notwithstanding any contrary provision of State law, but subject to the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, no creditor in connection with an obligation entered into on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 94th General Assembly, but prior to a service member's period of military service, shall charge or collect from a service member who has entered military service, or the spouse of that service member, interest or finance charges exceeding 6% per annum during the period of military service.
    • statute815 ILCS 205/6enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The payments due and to become due including all interest, discount and charges included therein under the terms of the loan contract, shall be reduced by the amount which the obligor is thus entitled to recover.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-5-5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Nothing in this Act shall be construed to permit a person or entity to contract for or receive a charge exceeding that permitted by the Interest Act or other law.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-5-15enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) No person or entity may engage in any device, subterfuge, or pretense to evade the requirements of this Act, including, but not limited to, making loans disguised as a personal property sale and leaseback transaction; disguising loan proceeds as a cash rebate for the pretextual installment sale of goods or services; or making, offering, assisting, or arranging a debtor to obtain a loan with a greater rate or interest, consideration, or charge than is permitted by this Act through any method including mail, telephone, internet, or any electronic means regardless of whether the person or entity has a physical location in the State.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-1-15enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Section, this Act applies to any person or entity that offers or makes a loan to a consumer in Illinois. (b) The provisions of this Act apply to any person or entity that seeks to evade its applicability by any device, subterfuge, or pretense whatsoever.
    • statute815 ILCS 123/15-1-10enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      "Lender" means any person or entity, including any affiliate or subsidiary of a lender, that offers or makes a loan, buys a whole or partial interest in a loan, arranges a loan for a third party, or acts as an agent for a third party in making a loan, regardless of whether approval, acceptance, or ratification by the third party is necessary to create a legal obligation for the third party, and includes any other person or entity if the Department determines that the person or entity is engaged in a transaction that is in substance a disguised loan or a subterfuge for the purpose of avoiding this Act.
  9. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in our Iowa contract lawful?

    Iowa's general ceiling is a published floating rate, with a wide list of borrowers who may agree to any rate at all. The maximum lawful rate that may be provided for in a written agreement entered into during a calendar month on or after April 13, 1979 is two percentage points above the monthly average ten-year constant maturity interest rate of United States government notes and bonds published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the second preceding calendar month, rounded to the nearest one-fourth of one percent per year (Iowa Code § 535.2(3)(a)(1)); the superintendent of banking determines and publishes that rate each month, and "This maximum lawful rate of interest shall be effective on the first day of the calendar month following publication." Where the parties have not agreed in writing, the rate on money due by express contract, money loaned and the other listed cases is five cents on the hundred by the year (§ 535.2(1)). But the persons listed in § 535.2(2)(a) "may agree in writing to pay any rate of interest", and a person so agreeing "shall not plead or interpose the claim or defense of usury in any action or proceeding", and the list has five items: a person borrowing to acquire real property or refinance a contract for deed; a person borrowing above the threshold amount "for the purpose of constructing improvements on real property, whether or not the real property is owned by the person"; "A vendee under a contract for deed to real property"; a domestic or foreign corporation, a real estate investment trust and a person buying securities on credit from a registered broker or dealer; and a person borrowing for business or agricultural purposes, or above the threshold amount for personal, family or household purposes. The threshold amount is not a figure Iowa sets for itself: it "means the threshold amount, as determined by 12 C.F.R. §1026.3(b), in effect during the period the consumer credit transaction was entered into" (§ 537.1301(47)). Charging more than the chapter allows is prohibited (§ 535.4), and the penalty is a forfeiture of eight cents on the hundred by the year on the principal remaining unpaid at judgment, with judgment for the plaintiff for the principal without costs and for the state for the forfeiture (§ 535.5).

    The trap

    The exemption list is where most commercial lending lands, and the statute drafts it as a bar rather than a defence: an exempt borrower who signed cannot plead or interpose usury at all, and the lender is not subject to any penalty or forfeiture for agreeing to receive or receiving the interest. Section 535.2(2)(b)(6) goes further and makes the subsection supersede interest-rate and finance-charge limitations elsewhere in the Code for those transactions, naming chapters 321, 322, 524, 533, 536A and 537. Timing is the other trap in the borrower's favour: a rate lawful when the agreement was made "shall ... remain lawful during the entire term of the agreement, including any extensions or renewals thereof, for all money due or to become due thereunder including future advances" (§ 535.2(3)(b)), so the floating ceiling is tested at contracting rather than month by month. This rule does not address federal preemption, and does not state the rate rules of Iowa's banking, credit union, industrial loan or consumer credit chapters. Whether a loan is in the exempt class is decided by rules the section states. A business purpose "includes but is not limited to a commercial, service, or industrial enterprise carried on for profit and an investment activity", and under § 535.2(2)(b) "The purpose for which money is borrowed is the purpose to which a majority of the loan proceeds are applied or are designated in the agreement to be applied." Refinancing proceeds take the purposes of the loan they repay. There is also a drafting trap inside the subsection the ceiling comes from. A note that can escalate must also be able to come back down: an agreement at a rate permitted by subsection 3 "which contains any provisions providing for an increase in the rate of interest prescribed therein shall, if such increase could be to a rate which would have been unlawful at the time the agreement was made, also provide for a reduction in the rate of interest prescribed therein, to be determined in the same manner and with the same frequency as any increase so provided for" (§ 535.2(3)(d)).

    as of 2026-09-19

    16 authorities

    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The maximum lawful rate of interest which may be provided for in any written agreement for the payment of interest entered into during any calendar month commencing on or after April 13, 1979, shall be two percentage points above the monthly average ten-year constant maturity interest rate of United States government notes and bonds as published by the board of governors of the federal reserve system for the calendar month second preceding the month during which the maximum rate based thereon will be effective, rounded to the nearest one-fourth of one percent per year.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The following persons may agree in writing to pay any rate of interest, and a person so agreeing in writing shall not plead or interpose the claim or defense of usury in any action or proceeding, and the person agreeing to receive the interest is not subject to any penalty or forfeiture for agreeing to receive or for receiving the interest:
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (5) A person borrowing money or obtaining credit for business or agricultural purposes, or a person borrowing money or obtaining credit in an amount which exceeds the threshold amount, as defined in section 537.1301, for personal, family, or household purposes.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any rate of interest specified in any written agreement providing for the payment of interest shall, if such rate was lawful at the time the agreement was made, remain lawful during the entire term of the agreement, including any extensions or renewals thereof, for all money due or to become due thereunder including future advances, if any.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      With respect to any transaction referred to in paragraph “a” of this subsection, this subsection supersedes any interest-rate or finance-charge limitations contained in the Code, including but not limited to this chapter and chapters 321, 322, 524, 533, 536A, and 537.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No person shall, directly or indirectly, receive in money or in any other thing, or in any manner, any greater sum or value for the loan of money, or upon contract founded upon any sale or loan of real or personal property, than is in this chapter prescribed.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      If it is ascertained in an action brought on a contract that a rate of interest has been contracted for, directly or indirectly, in money or in property, greater than is authorized by this chapter, the rate shall work a forfeiture of eight cents on the hundred by the year upon the amount of the principal remaining unpaid upon the contract at the time judgment is rendered, and the court shall enter final judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the principal sum remaining unpaid without costs, and also against the defendant and in favor of the state, to be paid to the treasurer of state for deposit in the general fund of the state, for the amount of the forfeiture. If unlawful interest is contracted for the plaintiff shall not have judgment for more than the principal sum, whether the unlawful interest is incorporated with the principal or not.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as provided in subsection 2, the rate of interest shall be five cents on the hundred by the year in the following cases, unless the parties shall agree in writing for the payment of interest at a rate not exceeding the rate permitted by subsection 3: a. Money due by express contract. b. Money after the same becomes due. c. Money loaned. d. Money received to the use of another and retained beyond a reasonable time, without the owner’s consent, express or implied. e. Money due on the settlement of accounts from the day the balance is ascertained. f. Money due upon open accounts after six months from the date of the last item. g. Money due, or to become due, where there is a contract to pay interest, and no rate is stipulated.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      On or before the twentieth day of each month the superintendent of banking shall determine the maximum lawful rate of interest for the following calendar month as prescribed herein, and shall cause this rate to be published, as a notice in the Iowa administrative bulletin or as a legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation published in Polk county, prior to the first day of the following calendar month. This maximum lawful rate of interest shall be effective on the first day of the calendar month following publication. The determination of the maximum lawful rate of interest by the superintendent of banking shall be exempt from the provisions of chapter 17A.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (1) A person borrowing money for the purpose of acquiring real property or refinancing a contract for deed.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (4) A domestic or foreign corporation, and a real estate investment trust as defined in section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code, and a person purchasing securities as defined in chapter 502 on credit from a broker or dealer registered or licensed under chapter 502 or under the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78a et seq., as amended.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (2) A person borrowing money or obtaining credit in an amount which exceeds the threshold amount as defined in section 537.1301, exclusive of interest, for the purpose of constructing improvements on real property, whether or not the real property is owned by the person. (3) A vendee under a contract for deed to real property.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      As used in this paragraph, “agricultural purpose” means as defined in section 535.13, and “business purpose” includes but is not limited to a commercial, service, or industrial enterprise carried on for profit and an investment activity.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      In determining exemptions under this subsection, the rules of construction stated in this paragraph apply: (1) The purpose for which money is borrowed is the purpose to which a majority of the loan proceeds are applied or are designated in the agreement to be applied. (2) Loan proceeds used to refinance or pay a prior loan owed by the same borrower are applied for the same purposes and in the same proportion as the original principal of the loan that is refinanced or paid.
    • statuteIowa Code § 535.2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any contract, note or other written agreement providing for the payment of a rate of interest permitted by this subsection which contains any provisions providing for an increase in the rate of interest prescribed therein shall, if such increase could be to a rate which would have been unlawful at the time the agreement was made, also provide for a reduction in the rate of interest prescribed therein, to be determined in the same manner and with the same frequency as any increase so provided for.
    • statuteIowa Code § 537.1301enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      “Threshold amount” means the threshold amount, as determined by 12 C.F.R. §1026.3(b), in effect during the period the consumer credit transaction was entered into.
  10. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in our Kansas contract lawful?

    Fifteen percent is the general contract ceiling, and most commercial loans are outside it. Subject to the rest of the section, the parties to any bond, bill, promissory note or other instrument of writing for the payment or forbearance of money may stipulate for interest at a rate not to exceed 15% per annum unless otherwise specifically authorized by law (K.S.A. 16-207(a)). Where no other rate of interest is agreed upon, creditors are allowed 10% per annum for money after it becomes due, and K.S.A. 16-201(a) lists the other cases: money lent or due on settlement of account from the day of liquidating the account, money received for another's use and retained without the owner's knowledge, money "due and withheld by an unreasonable and vexatious delay of payment or settlement of accounts", other money due for forbearance where an express promise to pay interest has been made, and wages due daily or monthly employees from the end of each month unless paid within 15 days. Contracting for a greater rate than K.S.A. 16-207 authorizes costs the lender the excess twice over: the lender forfeits all interest contracted for in excess of the authorized amount and, in addition, forfeits a sum equal to that excess, to be deducted from the amount due for principal and lawful interest, which may be set up as a defense or counterclaim, and the borrower also recovers a reasonable attorney fee (K.S.A. 16-207(d)).

    The trap

    Subsection (a) does not apply to five classes, and the fifth swallows most commercial lending: a covered transaction under the Kansas mortgage business act; a consumer credit transaction under the uniform consumer credit code; loans by a qualified plan to a participant or a member of the participant's family; a note secured by a real estate mortgage or a contract for deed that permits adjustment of the interest rate, the term or the amortization schedule; or "a business or agricultural transaction", which the section defines as a loan, including a note secured by a contract for deed to real estate or a credit sale, made primarily for purposes other than personal, family or household purposes (K.S.A. 16-207(e)). The remedy is bounded the same way the ceiling is: subsections (b), (c) and (d) do not apply to a covered transaction under the Kansas mortgage business act or to a consumer credit transaction under the uniform consumer credit code (K.S.A. 16-207(f)), so for those two kinds of transaction neither the 15% ceiling nor the forfeiture remedy is the governing rule and the rate rules of those two acts are. A separate section kills the commonest default clause outright. Where a rate of interest or charges is specified in a contract "that rate shall continue until full payment is made", a judgment on the contract bears the same rate, "in no case shall such rate or charges exceed the maximum rate or amount authorized by law", and any contract for the payment of money "which in effect provides that any interest or charges or any higher rate of interest or charges shall accrue as a penalty for any default, shall be void as to any such provision" (K.S.A. 16-205(a)). A step-up to a higher rate on default is that provision. Two entity statutes go further and take the defence away altogether: no corporation shall plead any statute against usury in any suit to enforce payment of any bond, note or other evidence of indebtedness issued or assumed by it (K.S.A. 17-7105), and no obligation of a member or manager of a limited liability company arising under the operating agreement or a separate agreement is subject to the defence of usury (K.S.A. 17-76,103). Kansas also opted out of the federal override: K.S.A. 16-207a provides that "The provisions of section 501 (a) (1) of title V of public law 96-221 shall not apply with respect to loans, mortgages, credit sales and advances made in this state on and after the effective date of this act", so the federal rate preemption that section would otherwise supply is switched off in Kansas.

    as of 2026-10-08

    10 authorities

    • statuteK.S.A. 16-207enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Subject to the following provision, the parties to any bond, bill, promissory note or other instrument of writing for the payment or forbearance of money may stipulate therein for interest receivable upon the amount of such bond, bill, note or other instrument of writing, at a rate not to exceed 15% per annum unless otherwise specifically authorized by law.
    • statuteK.S.A. 16-207enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any person so contracting for a greater rate of interest than that authorized by this section shall forfeit all interest so contracted for in excess of the amount authorized under this section; and in addition thereto shall forfeit a sum of money, to be deducted from the amount due for principal and lawful interest, equal to the amount of interest contracted for in excess of the amount authorized by this section and such amounts may be set up as a defense or counterclaim in any action to enforce the collection of such obligation and the borrower shall also recover a reasonable attorney fee.
    • statuteK.S.A. 16-207enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      a business or agricultural transaction. For the purpose of this section, a "business or agricultural transaction" means a loan, including a note secured by a contract for deed to real estate or a credit sale, which is made primarily for purposes other than personal, family or household purposes.
    • statuteK.S.A. 16-201enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as provided in subsection (b), creditors shall be allowed to receive interest at the rate of 10% per annum when no other rate of interest is agreed upon, for any money after it becomes due; for money lent or money due on settlement of account, from the day of liquidating the account and ascertaining the balance; for money received for the use of another and retained without the owner's knowledge of the receipt; for money due and withheld by an unreasonable and vexatious delay of payment or settlement of accounts; for all other money due and to become due for the forbearance of payment whereof an express promise to pay interest has been made; and for money due from corporations and individuals to their daily or monthly employees, from and after the end of each month, unless paid within 15 days thereafter.
    • statuteK.S.A. 17-7105enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No corporation shall plead any statute against usury in any court in any suit instituted to enforce the payment of any bond, note or other evidence of indebtedness issued or assumed by it.
    • statuteK.S.A. 17-76,103enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No obligation of a member or manager of a limited liability company to the limited liability company, or to a member or manager of the limited liability company, arising under the operating agreement or a separate agreement or writing, and no note, instrument or other writing evidencing any such obligation of a member or manager, shall be subject to the defense of usury, and no member or manager shall interpose the defense of usury with respect to any such obligation in any action.
    • statuteK.S.A. 16-207enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (e) Subsection (a) shall not apply to: (1) A covered transaction subject to the usury provisions of the Kansas mortgage business act, K.S.A. 9-2201 et seq., and amendments thereto; (2) a consumer credit transaction subject to the usury provisions of the uniform consumer credit code, K.S.A. 16a-1-101 et seq., and amendments thereto; (3) loans made by a qualified plan, as defined by the internal revenue code, to an individual participant in such plan or to a member of the family of such individual participant; (4) a note secured by a real estate mortgage or a contract for deed to real estate when the note or contract for deed permits adjustment of the interest rate, the term of the loan or the amortization schedule; or (5) a business or agricultural transaction.
    • statuteK.S.A. 16-207aenactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The provisions of section 501 (a) (1) of title V of public law 96-221 shall not apply with respect to loans, mortgages, credit sales and advances made in this state on and after the effective date of this act.
    • statuteK.S.A. 16-207enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (f) Subsections (b), (c) and (d) shall not apply to: (1) A covered transaction under the Kansas mortgage business act, K.S.A. 9-2201 et seq., and amendments thereto; or (2) a consumer credit transaction under the uniform consumer credit code, K.S.A. 16a-1-101 et seq., and amendments thereto.
    • statuteK.S.A. 16-205enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) When a rate of interest or charges is specified in any contract, that rate shall continue until full payment is made, and any judgment rendered on any such contract shall bear the same rate of interest or charges mentioned in the contract, which rate shall be specified in the judgment; but in no case shall such rate or charges exceed the maximum rate or amount authorized by law, and any bond, note, bill, or other contract for the payment of money, which in effect provides that any interest or charges or any higher rate of interest or charges shall accrue as a penalty for any default, shall be void as to any such provision.
  11. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in this Louisiana loan or credit agreement usurious, and does it matter that the borrower is a business?

    It depends heavily on whether the transaction is consumer or commercial. Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:3500(C)(1) sets the general conventional-interest cap: "The amount of the conventional interest cannot exceed twelve percent per annum. The same must be fixed in writing; testimonial proof of it is not admitted in any case." The Louisiana Supreme Court applies the cap's writing requirement literally: in Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., construing the identical predecessor text, the Court held that a contract merely providing reimbursement of "the full amount of the interest charged" did not satisfy the requirement: "It is obvious from a reading of the contract that Chittenden did not agree to pay a sum of conventional interest which was fixed in writing." Failing the writing requirement did not wipe out the interest, though, and that is the part a reader would act on: the Court held the lender "may nonetheless recover interest from the dates that he expended money on Chittenden's behalf", limited him to "simple legal interest on the funds advanced in the performance of his contingent fee contract", and remanded for its computation. But the cap has a broad, express commercial-transaction exemption: R.S. 9:3500(D), "The provisions of this Article shall not apply to a loan made for commercial or business purposes or deferring payment of an obligation for commercial or business purposes." A borrower who pays more than the cap on a covered transaction has a limited, time-bound remedy, and it is qualified in its own first words, "Except in the cases herein provided": R.S. 9:3500(C)(2), "if any person shall pay on any contract a higher rate of interest than the above, ... the same may be sued for and recovered within two years from the time of such payment."

    The trap

    The commercial-purpose exemption in R.S. 9:3500(D) is easy to miss because it sits at the very end of a long section whose opening subsections read as an unqualified, general-purpose usury cap: a reviewer who stops at subsection (C)'s 12% ceiling and writing requirement will misstate the law for any business loan, where the cap does not apply at all under Louisiana's own text. Do not assume subsection (C)(1) is the whole of the section, either. R.S. 9:3500(C)(3)(a) and (C)(4)(a) let the holder of a note or other written evidence of debt collect the full amount "notwithstanding" a rate beyond twelve percent, capping only what runs afterwards: "such obligation shall not bear more than twelve percent per annum after maturity until paid." Both paragraphs then except the regimes a reviewer is most likely to be in. (C)(3)(b) takes out "the banking institutions of this state in operation under existing laws" and "a consumer credit transaction as defined by the Louisiana Consumer Credit Law", and (C)(4)(b) takes out consumer credit transactions as well, so neither a bank nor a licensed consumer lender is answering to this section on those terms. (C)(4)(c) is the borrower's side of the writing requirement: where usury is a defence, "it is permissible for the defendant to show the usury whether same was given by way of discount or otherwise, by any competent evidence." Chittenden's holding cuts against a lender relying on an oral or informally-referenced interest arrangement even within the cap's own scope: the "fixed in writing" requirement is a real formality, not boilerplate, and "testimonial proof of it is not admitted in any case" bars a lender from proving an above-cap oral rate by witness testimony even where the borrower does not dispute having agreed to it. And the usury remedy of R.S. 9:3500(C)(2) runs from the DATE OF PAYMENT, not the date the rate was charged or the date the loan was made: a borrower who let years pass without making a usurious payment may find the two-year window has not even started running, while one who paid recently but under a years-old note is still within time.

    as of 2026-09-21

    9 authorities

    • statuteLa. R.S. 9:3500enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The amount of the conventional interest cannot exceed twelve percent per annum. The same must be fixed in writing; testimonial proof of it is not admitted in any case.
    • statuteLa. R.S. 9:3500enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The provisions of this Article shall not apply to a loan made for commercial or business purposes or deferring payment of an obligation for commercial or business purposes.
    • statuteLa. R.S. 9:3500enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (2) Except in the cases herein provided, if any person shall pay on any contract a higher rate of interest than the above, as discount or otherwise, the same may be sued for and recovered within two years from the time of such payment.
    • case788 So.2d 1140Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.La.decided 2001read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      When charging interest, the Louisiana Civil Code mandates that the conventional rate of interest cannot exceed 12% per annum and that the interest rate be expressed in writing. LA. CIV.CODE ANN. art. 2924C(1). [22] The article provides, in pertinent part: C. (1) The amount of the conventional interest cannot exceed twelve percent per annum. The same must be fixed in writing; testimonial proof of it is not admitted in any case.
    • case788 So.2d 1140Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.La.decided 2001read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      In the present case, the contract only provided that "the full amount of the interest charged on such loans will be reimbursed to Attorneys ... out of the funds received on this claim." It is obvious from a reading of the contract that Chittenden did not agree to pay a sum of conventional interest which was fixed in writing. It is likewise clear that Carimi may not establish the conventional rate of interest through the testimony of Chittenden and Breaux that they may have had discussions about what the interest rate might be.
    • statuteLa. R.S. 9:3500enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (3)(a) The owner or discounter of any note or bond or other written evidence of debt for the payment of money, payable to order or bearer or by assignment, shall have the right to claim and recover the full amount of such note, bond, or other written evidence of debt and all interest not beyond twelve percent per annum interest that may accrue thereon, notwithstanding that the rate of interest or discount at which the same may be or may have been discounted has been beyond the rate of twelve percent per annum interest or discount. (b) This provision shall not apply to the banking institutions of this state in operation under existing laws or to a consumer credit transaction as defined by the Louisiana Consumer Credit Law.
    • statuteLa. R.S. 9:3500enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (4)(a) The owner of any promissory note, bond, or other written evidence of debt for the payment of money to order or bearer or transferable by assignment shall have the right to collect the whole amount of such promissory note, bond, or other written evidence of debt for the payment of money, notwithstanding such promissory note, bond, or other written evidence of debt for the payment of money may include a greater rate of interest or discount than twelve percent per annum; such obligation shall not bear more than twelve percent per annum after maturity until paid. (b) This provision shall not apply to a consumer credit transaction as defined by the Louisiana Consumer Credit Law. (c) Where usury is a defense to a suit on a promissory note or other contract of similar character, it is permissible for the defendant to show the usury whether same was given by way of discount or otherwise, by any competent evidence.
    • case788 So.2d 1140Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.La.decided 2001read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding, Carimi may nonetheless recover interest from the dates that he expended money on Chittenden's behalf because he contracted to pay interest to Carimi on the loans that were made on his behalf. However, because Chittenden did not agree that interest would be compounded, he is only obligated to pay simple interest to Carimi.
    • case788 So.2d 1140Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.La.decided 2001read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      However, we find that Carimi is limited to the recovery of simple legal interest on the funds advanced in the performance of his contingent fee contract. DECREE For the foregoing reasons, the judgments of the lower courts are affirmed in part and reversed in part. This case is remanded to the trial court for the computation of Chittenden's interest obligations in accordance with the views expressed in this opinion. REMANDED.
  12. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in our Maine contract capped?

    Generally no, but the authority for that is thinner than it looks. The Law Court said Maine has no general usury statute once, in 1972, in Maine Merchants Association, Inc. v. Campbell: "The very narrow issue we have for decision is: Are revolving charge accounts intended to be regulated by 9 M.R.S.A. § 3086? Maine does not have a general usury statute." The Court held the Bank Commissioner had misread that section, and remanded for a permanent injunction against enforcing his ruling. The section it construed, 9 M.R.S. § 3086, was repealed the following year by the act that created the Consumer Credit Code, and no later Maine opinion restates the proposition. A rate is capped where a specific lending statute reaches the transaction. The Consumer Credit Code does so for consumer loans: 9-A M.R.S. § 2-401(2) lets a lender contract for a finance charge not exceeding 30% per year on the part of the unpaid balance that is $2,000 or less, 24% on the part over $2,000 but not over $4,000, and 18% on the part over $4,000; and "[n]otwithstanding paragraph A, with respect to a consumer loan in which the amount financed exceeds $8,000, a lender may not contract for and receive a finance charge ... in excess of 18% per year on the entire amount of the loan". Two further caps sit in the same section: a minimum charge of $5, $15 or $25 by loan size under subsection 7, and an 18%-or-federal-rate ceiling for manufactured-housing finance under subsection 8. For a financial institution, 9-B M.R.S. § 432(1) supplies only a default: "[t]he maximum legal rate of interest on a loan made by a financial institution, in the absence of an agreement in writing establishing a different rate, shall be 6 percent per year."

    The trap

    "No general usury statute" is not "no rate risk", and the phrase itself rests on a single sentence from 1972 about a section repealed in 1973, so treat it as the absence of a general cap rather than as a holding you can cite for a modern loan. Three things still bite. First, 9-B M.R.S. § 432(2)(A) routes a NONCOMMERCIAL OR CONSUMER loan by a financial institution back into Title 9-A's limits regardless of what the writing says; its only carve-out is that "[a] loan made by a financial institution which is secured by a first mortgage on real estate shall not be within the interest limitations set forth in Title 9-A; provided that the security interest in real estate is not given for purpose of evading said Title 9-A", so labelling a consumer loan commercial is not a fix, and neither is taking a first mortgage for that purpose. Second, the Title 9-A ceilings are written with their own overrides: subsection 2's tiered rates are capped at a flat 18% once the amount financed exceeds $8,000, subsection 7 permits a minimum charge "[n]otwithstanding subsection 2", and subsection 8 displaces every other subsection for manufactured housing. Read the subsection that applies, not the headline rate. Third, an excessive charge dressed as a fee gets tested as a liquidated-damages clause: "[i]f a late charge amounts to liquidated damages, we will affirm it; if it is an excessive or usurious penalty, we will not uphold the provision" (Raisin Memorial Trust v. Casey), so a per-diem late charge plus a default rate plus acceleration is a penalty question in Maine even where no rate cap applies.

    as of 2026-09-20

    11 authorities

    • case287 A.2d 430Maine Merchants Association, Inc. v. CampbellMe.decided 1972read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The very narrow issue we have for decision is: Are revolving charge accounts intended to be regulated by 9 M.R.S.A. § 3086? Maine does not have a general usury statute.
    • case287 A.2d 430Maine Merchants Association, Inc. v. Campbellme-medecided 1972read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      We are satisfied that the Bank Commissioner erroneously interpreted this statute when he issued Ruling 1971-1. The entry must be, Remanded to the Superior Court for the entry of Permanent Injunction Restraining the Bank Commissioner and all persons in active concert or participation with him from enforcing or taking any steps to enforce Bank Commissioner’s Ruling 1971-1.
    • statute9 M.R.S. § 3086enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      §3086. Maximum interest; evasions (REPEALED) SECTION HISTORY PL 1965, c. 205, §2 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 474, §6 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 762, §2 (RP).
    • statute9-A M.R.S. § 2-401enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      With respect to a consumer loan, other than a loan pursuant to open-end credit, a lender may contract for and receive a finance charge calculated according to the actuarial method, not exceeding the equivalent of the following:
    • statute9-A M.R.S. § 2-401enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding paragraph A , with respect to a consumer loan in which the amount financed exceeds $8,000, a lender may not contract for and receive a finance charge calculated according to the actuarial method in excess of 18% per year on the entire amount of the loan.
    • statute9-B M.R.S. § 432enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The maximum legal rate of interest on a loan made by a financial institution, in the absence of an agreement in writing establishing a different rate, shall be 6 percent per year.
    • case2008 ME 63Raisin Memorial Trust v. CaseyMe.decided 2008read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      If a late charge amounts to liquidated damages, we will affirm it; if it is an excessive or usurious penalty, we will not uphold the provision.
    • statute9-A M.R.S. § 2-401enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A. The total of: (i) 30% per year on that part of the unpaid balances of the amount financed that is $2,000 or less; (ii) 24% per year on that part of the unpaid balances of the amount financed that is more than $2,000 but does not exceed $4,000; and (iii) 18% per year on that part of the unpaid balances of the amount financed that is more than $4,000.
    • statute9-A M.R.S. § 2-401enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding subsection 2 , the lender may contract for and receive a minimum charge of not more than: A. Five dollars when the amount financed does not exceed $75; [PL 1975, c. 298, §2 (NEW).] B. Fifteen dollars when the amount financed exceeds $75, but is less than $250; or [PL 1999, c. 184, §3 (AMD).] C. Twenty-five dollars when the amount financed is $250 or more.
    • statute9-A M.R.S. § 2-401enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding any other subsection, the finance charge on a transaction to finance or refinance the acquisition of, or secured by, manufactured housing, not involving a security interest in real estate, may not exceed the greater of the following: A. A rate 2% greater than the maximum rate established by federal regulations pursuant to the United States Code, Title 38, Section 1819(f), Veterans Housing Act of 1970, as amended, and published from time to time in the Federal Register, 38 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 36; or [PL 1987, c. 129, §43 (AMD).] B. 18% per year.
    • statute9-B M.R.S. § 432enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The legal rate of interest, whether set forth in writing or not, on a noncommercial or consumer loan, shall be established in accordance with and subject to the limitations set forth in Title 9-A . A loan made by a financial institution which is secured by a first mortgage on real estate shall not be within the interest limitations set forth in Title 9-A ; provided that the security interest in real estate is not given for purpose of evading said Title 9-A .
  13. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What interest rate can this loan carry under Minnesota law, and what happens if it is too high?

    The general rule in Minn. Stat. § 334.01, subd. 1 is that interest for any legal indebtedness is $6 upon $100 for a year unless a different rate is contracted for in writing, and that no person shall directly or indirectly take or receive, in money, goods, things in action or in any other way, any greater sum or value for the loan or forbearance of money, goods or things in action than $8 on $100 for one year. Two exemptions matter more than the cap. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary (with the exceptions the subdivision names for § 58.137 and § 47.20, subd. 4a), NO limitation on the rate or amount of interest, points, finance charges, fees or other charges applies to a loan, mortgage, credit sale or advance made under a written contract signed by the debtor for the extension of credit of $100,000 OR MORE, or to any written extension or modification of it, and "The written contract, written extension, and written modification are exempt from the other provisions of this chapter" (§ 334.01, subd. 2), so the remedies below do not reach a written contract of $100,000 or more. And for a loan or forbearance of LESS than $100,000 for business or agricultural purposes, a person may charge not more than 4-1/2 percent in excess of the discount rate on 90-day commercial paper in effect at the Federal Reserve Bank in the Federal Reserve District encompassing Minnesota (§ 334.011, subd. 1). Remedies: a contract reserving more than the statute prescribes is VOID except as to a holder in due course (§ 334.03), subject to the section's own exceptions: a merely clerical error in computing interest made without intent to avoid the chapter is not usury, payment of interest in advance for a year or less at a rate not exceeding eight percent is not usury, and where the original holder of a usurious note sells it to an innocent purchaser the maker "may recover back from the original holder the amount of principal and interest paid on the note"; a borrower who paid more than § 334.01 allows may recover the full amount of interest or premium paid, with costs, if the action is brought within TWO YEARS of payment (§ 334.02); and under § 334.011, subd. 2 an excessive business or agricultural rate forfeits the entire interest due, and a borrower who paid it may recover twice the interest paid.

    The trap

    The lender exemptions in the sections next door can flip the answer completely. Both § 334.02 and § 334.03 say in terms that they do 'not apply when the loan or forbearance is made by a lender and the lender is subject to section 47.59 or 48.196 or chapter 56 in connection with the loan or forbearance', and each defines 'lender' to include state banks and savings banks, federally chartered savings associations and savings banks, chapter 51A savings associations, federal and chapter 52 credit unions, chapter 53 industrial loan and thrift companies, chapter 56 licensed lenders, and HUD- or VA-approved mortgagees, so for most institutional lenders neither the voiding rule nor the two-year recovery action is available on these sections' words. Two more points from the text. The business and agricultural rate in § 334.011 is measured once: if the rate was permitted when the loan was made, it does not later become usurious because of a fluctuation in the federal discount rate (subd. 3), and no loan may be made under that subdivision if the proceeds finance the purchase or maintenance of real estate used principally for the borrower's residence. And § 334.01, subd. 1 makes a post-maturity rate INCREASE work a forfeiture of the entire interest, with exceptions for instruments bearing no interest before maturity and for maturity extensions capped at $8 on $100 per year. Federal preemption is out of scope for this rule. The same chapter carries a compounding rule the cap does not mention: “In the computation of interest upon any bond, note, or other instrument or agreement, interest shall not be compounded, but any contract to pay interest, not usurious, upon interest overdue, shall not be construed to be usury.” So compounding is barred in the computation, while a separate, non-usurious agreement to pay interest on overdue interest is treated differently.

    as of 2026-09-17

    12 authorities

    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.01enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The interest for any legal indebtedness shall be at the rate of $6 upon $100 for a year, unless a different rate is contracted for in writing. No person shall directly or indirectly take or receive in money, goods, or things in action, or in any other way, any greater sum, or any greater value, for the loan or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action, than $8 on $100 for one year.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.01enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, except as stated in section 58.137 , and with respect to a conventional loan or contract for deed, section 47.20 , subdivision 4a, no limitation on the rate or amount of interest, points, finance charges, fees, or other charges applies to a loan, mortgage, credit sale, or advance made under a written contract, signed by the debtor, for the extension of credit to the debtor in the amount of $100,000 or more, or any written extension and other written modification of the written contract. The written contract, written extension, and written modification are exempt from the other provisions of this chapter.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.011enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding the provisions of any law to the contrary a person may, in the case of a contract for the loan or forbearance of money, goods, or other things in action in an amount of less than $100,000 for business or agricultural purposes, charge interest at a rate of not more than 4-1/2 percent in excess of the discount rate on 90-day commercial paper in effect at the Federal Reserve Bank in the Federal Reserve District encompassing Minnesota. For the purposes of this subdivision, the term "business" means a commercial or industrial enterprise which is carried on for the purpose of active or passive investment or profit. For the purposes of this subdivision, the term "agricultural" means the production, harvest, exhibition, marketing, transportation, processing, or manufacture of agricultural products, including horticultural, viticultural, and dairy products, livestock, wildlife, poultry, bees, forest products, fish and shellfish, and any parts thereof, including processed and manufactured products, and any and all products raised or produced on farms and any processed or manufactured products thereof.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.011enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      If a greater rate of interest than that permitted by subdivision 1 is charged then the entire interest due on that note, bill or other evidence of debt is forfeited. If the greater rate of interest has been paid, the person who paid it may recover in a civil action an amount equal to twice the amount of interest paid.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.011enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      If the rate of interest charged is permitted by this section at the time the loan was made, that rate of interest does not later become usurious because of a fluctuation in the federal discount rate.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.02enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Every person who for any such loan or forbearance shall have paid or delivered any greater sum or value than in section 334.01 allowed to be received may, personally or through personal representatives, recover in an action against the person who shall have received the same, or the receiver's personal representatives, the full amount of interest or premium so paid, with costs, if action is brought within two years after such payment or delivery.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.03enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      All bonds, bills, notes, mortgages, and all other contracts and securities, and all deposits of goods, or any other thing, whereupon or whereby there shall be reserved, secured, or taken any greater sum or value for the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action than prescribed, except such instruments which are taken or received in accordance with and in reliance upon the provisions of any statute, shall be void except as to a holder in due course. No merely clerical error in the computation of interest, made without intent to avoid the provisions of this chapter, shall constitute usury. Interest at the rate of 1/12 of eight percent for every 30 days shall not be construed to exceed eight percent per annum; nor shall the payment of interest in advance of one year, or any less time, at a rate not exceeding eight percent per annum constitute usury; and nothing herein shall prevent the purchase of negotiable mercantile paper, usurious or otherwise, for a valuable consideration, by a purchaser without notice, at any price before the maturity of the same, when there has been no intent to evade the provisions of this chapter, or where such purchase has not been a part of the original usurious transactions; but where the original holder of a usurious note sells the same to an innocent purchaser, the maker thereof, or the maker's representatives, may recover back from the original holder the amount of principal and interest paid on the note. This section does not apply when the loan or forbearance is made by a lender and the lender is subject to section 47.59 or 48.196 or chapter 56 in connection with the loan or forbearance.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.01enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      In the computation of interest upon any bond, note, or other instrument or agreement, interest shall not be compounded, but any contract to pay interest, not usurious, upon interest overdue, shall not be construed to be usury.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.02enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This section does not apply when the loan or forbearance is made by a lender and the lender is subject to section 47.59 or 48.196 or chapter 56 in connection with the loan or forbearance. For purposes of this section, the term "lender" means a bank or savings bank organized under the laws of this state, a federally chartered savings association or savings bank, a savings association organized under chapter 51A, a federally chartered credit union, a credit union organized under chapter 52, an industrial loan and thrift company organized under chapter 53, a licensed lender under chapter 56, or a mortgagee or lender approved or certified by the secretary of housing and urban development or approved or certified by the administrator of veterans affairs.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.03enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      For purposes of this section, the term "lender" means a bank or savings bank organized under the laws of this state, a federally chartered savings association or savings bank, a savings association organized under chapter 51A, a federally chartered credit union, a credit union organized under chapter 52, an industrial loan and thrift company organized under chapter 53, a licensed lender under chapter 56, or a mortgagee or lender approved or certified by the secretary of housing and urban development or approved or certified by the administrator of veterans affairs.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.011enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No loan shall be made pursuant to this subdivision if the proceeds of the loan are used to finance the purchase or maintenance of real estate used principally for the borrower's residence.
    • statuteMinn. Stat. § 334.01enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Contracts shall bear the same rate of interest after they become due as before, and any provision in any contract, note, or instrument providing for an increase of the rate of interest after maturity, or any increase therein after making and delivery, shall work a forfeiture of the entire interest; but this provision shall not apply to notes or contracts which bear no interest before maturity nor shall it apply to any agreement which extends the maturity date of any contract, note, or instrument, and provides for an increased rate of interest after the original maturity date on the indebtedness then due. Any agreement which extends maturity date of any contract, note or instrument shall not provide for an increased rate of interest in excess of $8 on $100 for one year.
  14. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Does Montana's usury cap apply to this contract's interest or finance-charge rate, and what happens if we exceed it?

    It depends on whether the charge is interest on a LOAN OF MONEY, and even then, the contract survives; only a damages remedy attaches. Montana caps agreed interest at “any rate of interest that does not exceed the greater of 15% or an amount that is 6 percentage points per year above the prime rate published by the federal reserve system in its statistical release H.15…dated 3 business days prior to the execution of the agreement” (§ 31-1-107(1), MCA), and “[a] loan that is not usurious when made is lawful for the duration of the loan, provided the loan agreement is not substantially changed” (§ 31-1-107(2)), a proviso that “does not apply to loan renewals.” The rate the cap is measured against is not just the stated coupon: “[i]nterest is the compensation allowed by law or fixed by the parties for the use or forbearance or detention of money and includes loan origination fees, points, and prepaid finance charges, as defined in 12 CFR 226.2” (§ 31-1-104), so fees priced into the front of a loan count toward the 15% or prime-plus-6 ceiling. Exceeding the cap does NOT void the debt: the penalty is a forfeiture of double the interest charged (§ 31-1-108(1)), and a borrower who actually paid excessive interest may sue to recover double what was paid, provided the action is brought within 2 years of payment and after a written demand for return of the interest (§ 31-1-108(2)). Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community v. Quantum Five, Inc. confirms Montana courts apply exactly this double-damages mechanic, not contract voidance: against a party's argument “that the interest rates charged were not usurious, the District Court held otherwise, and under §§ 31-1-107 and -108, MCA, assessed a usury penalty” rather than voiding the underlying debt. Two broad carve-outs remove the cap entirely: a “regulated lender” (other than certain deferred-deposit or consumer-loan licensees) “is exempt from all limitations on the rate of interest that it may charge and is exempt from the operation and effect of all usury statutes” (§ 31-1-112(1)), and a merchant-to-merchant finance operation is exempt as well (§ 31-1-112(2)), “merchant” being a person “that deals in goods of the kind or otherwise is held out by occupation as having knowledge or skill peculiar to the practices or goods involved in the transaction” (§ 30-2-104(1)).

    The trap

    The biggest trap is scope: Johnston v. Palmer held a defendant's usury defense “misplaced” because § 31-1-107 lives in “Title 31, Part 1 of the MCA”, which “specifically addresses interest rates associated with loans of money”: LOANS, which is the whole point. The 18% rate at issue there was not usurious because it was “not for a loan of money but rather…a contractually-agreed upon finance charge owed on the balance of funds due and unpaid after thirty days.” A late-payment finance charge on a commercial account, in other words, is not automatically subject to § 31-1-107 at all. Do not assume every commercial lender needs the statutory cap analyzed: § 31-1-112's “regulated lender” exemption is broad, and § 31-1-111 spells out how broad: it reaches a bank, building and loan association, savings and loan association, trust company, credit union, credit association, consumer loan licensee, deferred deposit loan licensee, residential mortgage lender licensee, development corporation, bank holding company or insurer “organized pursuant to state or federal statutory authority and subject to supervision, control, or regulation by” a Montana or federal agency, together with any subsidiary of one of those, state and federal lending agencies, and congressionally or legislatively created entities owned in whole or in part by the United States or Montana. An ordinary private lender is on none of those lists. And remember the remedy ceiling: even a genuinely usurious LOAN remains a valid, collectible debt in Montana: the statute punishes the excess, not the loan.

    as of 2026-09-20

    12 authorities

    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-107enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Parties may agree in writing to the payment of any rate of interest that does not exceed the greater of 15% or an amount that is 6 percentage points per year above the prime rate published by the federal reserve system in its statistical release H.15 Selected Interest Rates for bank prime loans dated 3 business days prior to the execution of the agreement. Interest must be allowed according to the terms of the agreement.
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-108enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The taking, receiving, reserving, or charging a rate of interest greater than is allowed by 31-1-107 must be considered a forfeiture of a sum double the amount of interest that the note, bill, or other evidence of debt carries or that has been agreed to be paid on the note, bill, or other evidence of debt.
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-112enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A regulated lender, except for a deferred deposit loan licensee or consumer loan licensee, is exempt from all limitations on the rate of interest that it may charge and is exempt from the operation and effect of all usury statutes.
    • case158 P.3d 998Johnston v. PalmerMont.decided 2007read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Palmer relies solely upon § 31-1-107, MCA, to support her claim that 18% interest exceeds the amount lawfully allowed and is usurious. However, Palmer’s reliance on § 31-1-107, MCA, is misplaced. Title 31, Part 1 of the MCA specifically addresses interest rates associated with loans of money. The interest rate awarded by the District Court in the case before us is not for a loan of money but rather is premised upon a contractually-agreed upon finance charge owed on the balance of funds due and unpaid after thirty days.
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-107enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A loan that is not usurious when made is lawful for the duration of the loan, provided the loan agreement is not substantially changed. This subsection does not apply to loan renewals.
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-108enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      When a greater rate of interest has been paid, the person by whom it has been paid or the person's heirs, assigns, executors, or administrators may recover from the person, firm, or corporation taking, receiving, reserving, or charging interest a sum double the amount of interest paid, provided that the action must be brought within 2 years after the payment of the interest, and provided that, before any suit may be brought to recover the usurious interest, the party bringing suit makes written demand for return of the interest paid.
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-112enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A finance operation that finances transactions between merchants, as defined in 30-2-104 , is also exempt from usury limits.
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-107enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The provisions of this section do not apply to regulated lenders as defined in 31-1-111 .
    • case91 P.3d 1255Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community v. Quantum Five, Inc.Mont.decided 2004read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      While Tribes proffered arguments that the interest rates charged were not usurious, the District Court held otherwise, and under §§ 31-1-107 and -108, MCA, assessed a usury penalty.
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-104enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Interest is the compensation allowed by law or fixed by the parties for the use or forbearance or detention of money and includes loan origination fees, points, and prepaid finance charges, as defined in 12 CFR 226.2.
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 31-1-111enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The term "regulated lender", as used in 31-1-112 and 31-1-116 , means: (1) a bank, building and loan association, savings and loan association, trust company, credit union, credit association, consumer loan licensee, deferred deposit loan licensee, residential mortgage lender licensee, development corporation, bank holding company, or mutual or stock insurance company organized pursuant to state or federal statutory authority and subject to supervision, control, or regulation by: (a) an agency of the state of Montana; or (b) an agency of the federal government;
    • statuteMont. Code Ann. § 30-2-104enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      "Merchant" means a person that deals in goods of the kind or otherwise is held out by occupation as having knowledge or skill peculiar to the practices or goods involved in the transaction or to which the knowledge or skill may be attributed by the person's employment of an agent or broker or other intermediary that is held out by occupation as having the knowledge or skill.
  15. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in this Nebraska contract lawful, and what happens if it is not?

    The general ceiling is sixteen percent a year, but the exemption list is so wide that most commercial lending is outside it, and the penalty is loss of interest rather than a void contract. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.03(1): “any rate of interest which may be agreed upon, not exceeding sixteen percent per annum on the unpaid principal balance, shall be valid upon any loan or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action”. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.04 then takes fourteen categories out of it, and four of them decide most business deals: “Loans made to any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or trust; (3) The guarantor or surety of any loan to a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or trust;”, “Loans made when the aggregate principal amount of the indebtedness is one hundred thousand dollars or more of the borrower to any one financial institution, licensee, or permittee;”, loans by Department of Banking and Finance licensees and by FDIC- or NCUA-insured institutions “made primarily for business or agricultural purposes or secured by real property”, and trade credit: “Interest charges made on open credit accounts by a person who sells goods or services on credit when the interest charges do not exceed one and one-third percent per month for any charges which remain unpaid for more than thirty days following rendition of the statement of account”, which is exactly sixteen percent a year. If the cap IS exceeded, § 45-105 is the remedy and it is not rescission: “the contract shall not on that account be void, but if in any action on such contract, proof be made that illegal interest has been directly or indirectly contracted for, or taken, or reserved, the plaintiff shall recover only the principal, without interest, and the defendant shall recover costs”, and “if interest shall have been paid thereon, judgment shall be for the principal, deducting interest paid”. Thomas Lakes Owners Ass'n v. Riley applied it to a homeowners' association whose bylaws charged 1.5 percent per thirty days: “At trial, the Association admitted to charging 1.5 percent per month, a rate equaling 18 percent per year, on the uncollected assessment amounts”, and the court modified the judgment “to find as a matter of law that the interest provision in the bylaws, if found to be validly adopted, is usurious.” Where no rate is agreed, the fallback depends on what the obligation is. On money due on an instrument in writing, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-104 supplies twelve percent: “Unless otherwise agreed, interest shall be allowed at the rate of twelve percent per annum on money due on any instrument in writing”. On a loan or forbearance with no agreed rate, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-102 supplies SIX percent, and has done since 1 September 1983: “Interest upon the loan or forbearance of money, goods or things in action shall be at the rate of twelve percent per annum for the period commencing on March 19, 1980, through August 31, 1983, and at the rate of six percent per annum commencing on September 1, 1983, on the unpaid principal balance, unless a greater rate, not exceeding the rate of interest provided in section 45-101.03 , be contracted for by the parties.”

    The trap

    The 1.5-percent-per-month late charge is the Nebraska trap, and it is in almost every form contract. One and a half percent a month is eighteen percent a year, over the cap, and the drafter who wrote it was probably copying the trade-credit exemption in § 45-101.04(7), which allows only “one and one-third percent per month”. A third of a point per month is the difference between a lawful default rate and losing every dollar of interest, including the prejudgment interest you would otherwise have had: Thomas Lakes holds that on remand “the Association should only recover the principal, without interest, and the Owners should recover costs, pursuant to § 45-105”, and reports Central Constr. Co. v. Blanchard as stating that § 45-105 “is a special statute governing usurious contracts, taking precedence over the general statute providing for interest on judgments in cases where usury is established”. Second trap: the exemptions turn on WHO the borrower is, not on the size of the deal alone, so the same eighteen percent note is unimpeachable against a corporate or LLC borrower and fatal against an individual, and a personal guarantor of an entity loan is inside the exemption by § 45-101.04(3) rather than outside it. Third: “interest” is defined narrowly by § 45-101.02 and excludes “loan service costs” (prepayment charges, delinquency charges, insurance premiums, escrow, appraisal, title, origination fees and more), so a Nebraska lender's real cost of funds can exceed the cap lawfully, while “discount points, if any, shall be amortized over the original term of the loan” for the purpose of computing the rate. Fourth, and this is what this rule does NOT tell you: there is no Nebraska authority here on whether a savings clause (“in no event shall interest exceed the maximum permitted by law”) rescues an otherwise usurious rate. Do not rely on one.

    as of 2026-09-20

    17 authorities

    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.03enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as provided in section 45-101.04 , any rate of interest which may be agreed upon, not exceeding sixteen percent per annum on the unpaid principal balance, shall be valid upon any loan or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.04enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The limitation on the rate of interest provided in section 45-101.03 shall not apply to:
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.04enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Loans made to any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or trust; (3) The guarantor or surety of any loan to a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or trust;
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.04enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Loans made when the aggregate principal amount of the indebtedness is one hundred thousand dollars or more of the borrower to any one financial institution, licensee, or permittee;
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.04enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Interest charges made on open credit accounts by a person who sells goods or services on credit when the interest charges do not exceed one and one-third percent per month for any charges which remain unpaid for more than thirty days following rendition of the statement of account;
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.04enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Loans made primarily for business or agricultural purposes or secured by real property when such loans are made (a) by a licensee, registrant, or permittee operating under a license, registration, or permit duly issued by the Department of Banking and Finance except for licensees operating under the Nebraska Installment Loan and Sales Act, (b) by any financial institution insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Administration, or (c) by any insurance company organized under the laws of this state and subject to regulation by the Department of Insurance;
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.02enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Interest means the compensation agreed upon or allowed by law upon any loan or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action but does not include loan service costs;
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.02enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      For the purpose of determining the rate of interest on any loan, discount points, if any, shall be amortized over the original term of the loan.
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-105enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      If a greater rate of interest than is allowed in section 45-101.03 shall be contracted for or received or reserved, the contract shall not on that account be void, but if in any action on such contract, proof be made that illegal interest has been directly or indirectly contracted for, or taken, or reserved, the plaintiff shall recover only the principal, without interest, and the defendant shall recover costs; and if interest shall have been paid thereon, judgment shall be for the principal, deducting interest paid
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-104enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Unless otherwise agreed, interest shall be allowed at the rate of twelve percent per annum on money due on any instrument in writing
    • case612 N.W.2d 529Thomas Lakes Owners Ass'n v. RileyNeb. Ct. App.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      At trial, the Association admitted to charging 1.5 percent per month, a rate equaling 18 percent per year, on the uncollected assessment amounts.
    • case612 N.W.2d 529Thomas Lakes Owners Ass'n v. RileyNeb. Ct. App.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      We modify the district court’s order to find as a matter of law that the interest provision in the bylaws, if found to be validly adopted, is usurious.
    • case612 N.W.2d 529Thomas Lakes Owners Ass'n v. RileyNeb. Ct. App.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      the Association should only recover the principal, without interest, and the Owners should recover costs, pursuant to § 45-105.
    • case612 N.W.2d 529Thomas Lakes Owners Ass'n v. RileyNeb. Ct. App.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      the court states that where the defense of usury is established, the plaintiff is not entitled to interest on the judgment awarded.
    • case612 N.W.2d 529Thomas Lakes Owners Ass'n v. RileyNeb. Ct. App.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The court goes on to state that § 45-105 is a special statute governing usurious contracts, taking precedence over the general statute providing for interest on judgments in cases where usury is established.
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-102enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Interest upon the loan or forbearance of money, goods or things in action shall be at the rate of twelve percent per annum for the period commencing on March 19, 1980, through August 31, 1983, and at the rate of six percent per annum commencing on September 1, 1983, on the unpaid principal balance, unless a greater rate, not exceeding the rate of interest provided in section 45-101.03 , be contracted for by the parties.
    • statuteNeb. Rev. Stat. § 45-101.04enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (13) Interest charges made on any goods or services sold under an installment contract pursuant to the Nebraska Installment Loan and Sales Act. Subject to section 45-365 , it shall be lawful to contract for and receive any rate of interest on such contract as the parties may expressly agree to in writing; or (14) Fees which may be charged by a licensee for services pursuant to the Delayed Deposit Services Licensing Act.
  16. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in this New Jersey note lawful?

    Except as otherwise provided by law, no person may take above $6.00 for the forbearance of $100.00 for a year, or, where there is a WRITTEN contract specifying a rate of interest, above $16.00 for the forbearance of $100.00 for a year: that is, 6% oral and 16% written. Independently of those civil caps, any loan or forbearance bearing interest above 30% per annum is not a rate authorized or permitted by law, except that for a loan to a corporation, limited liability company or limited liability partnership the criminal ceiling is 50% per annum. The civil consequence is forfeiture of the interest, not the loan: in any action to enforce a note, bond, mortgage or contract on which more than the lawful rate was reserved or taken, "the amount or value actually lent, without interest or costs of the action, may be recovered, and no more", and any illegal interest already paid is deducted from that (§ 31:1-3). A separate ceiling governs business and agricultural loans of $1,000 or more: where the rate this section would otherwise allow exceeds what the lender could charge without it, the rate may not exceed 5% over the Federal Reserve Bank of New York discount rate or 90-day commercial paper rate on the day of the loan (§ 31:1-1(g)). A second grant of rate-setting power sits outside R.S. 31:1-1 altogether: notwithstanding that section, the commissioner may by regulation establish a rate of interest which may be charged on loans equal to the rate Federal law or regulation allows national banking associations, at any time when the rate so allowed by Federal law exceeds 8% per annum, and it does not reach loans secured by a first lien on real property carrying a structure of one to six dwelling units. Where another law refers to a rate as that "established by R.S. 31:1-1", the rate applicable is instead the one so established (§ 31:1-1.1). On the criminal side the degrees are graded: second degree above 50% per annum; third degree at or below 50% where the loan exceeds $1,000 and the borrower is not a corporation, LLC or LLP; otherwise a disorderly persons offense; and knowingly engaging in the business of usurious lending is a second-degree crime with a fine up to $250,000 (§ 2C:21-19(a)-(b)).

    The trap

    The civil cap has a hole a commercial lender must know about and a consumer lender must not rely on: under § 31:1-1(e)(1) loans of $50,000.00 or more may bear ANY rate the parties agree, unless the security is a first lien on real property with one to six dwelling units, and the rate stated at origination may be taken even though repayments later drop the balance below $50,000. Exempt from the civil cap does NOT mean exempt from the criminal statute: N.J.S. 2C:21-19 still caps the transaction at 30% (50% for corporate, LLC and LLP borrowers), and criminal usury is a second-degree crime above 50%. Note also that the Commissioner of Banking may by regulation raise the ceiling for a loan secured by a first lien on real property carrying a structure of one to six dwelling units, to a value not more than the Monthly Index of Long Term United States Government Bond Yields for the second preceding calendar month plus an additional 8% per annum rounded off to the nearest quarter of 1% per annum (§ 31:1-1(b), (b)(1)); where such a regulation is in force the statutory 16% is not the operative number for that class of loan.

    as of 2026-09-16

    7 authorities

    • statuteN.J. Stat. Ann. § 31:1-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) Except as herein and otherwise provided by law, no person shall, upon contract, take, directly or indirectly for loan of any money, wares, merchandise, goods and chattels, above the value of $6.00 for the forbearance of $100.00 for a year, or when there is a written contract specifying a rate of interest, no person shall take above the value of $16.00 for the forbearance of $100.00 for a year.
    • statuteN.J. Stat. Ann. § 31:1-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) Notwithstanding the limitations of subsection (a) of this section, the Commissioner of Banking may by regulations adopted, amended and rescinded from time to time, provide that the value which may be taken for any loan secured by a first lien on real property as described in paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be a value more than $6.00 but not more than the Monthly Index of Long Term United States Government Bond Yields, compiled by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and as published by said Board of Governors in the monthly Federal Reserve Bulletin, for the second preceding calendar month plus an additional 8% per annum rounded off to the nearest quarter of 1% per annum. Within the limits as provided by this subsection, and if he finds it to be in the best interests of the citizens and economy of this State, the commissioner may establish: (1) A rate of interest on loans secured by a first lien on real property on which there is erected or to be erected a structure containing one, two, three, four, five or six dwelling units, a portion of which structure may be used for nonresidential purposes.
    • statuteN.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:21-19enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      a. Criminal usury. A person is guilty of criminal usury when not being authorized or permitted by law to do so, he: (1) Loans or agrees to loan, directly or indirectly, any money or other property at a rate exceeding the maximum rate permitted by law; or (2) Takes, agrees to take, or receives any money or other property as interest on the loan or on the forbearance of any money or other interest in excess of the maximum rate permitted by law. For the purposes of this section and notwithstanding any law of this State which permits as a maximum interest rate a rate or rates agreed to by the parties of the transaction, any loan or forbearance with an interest rate which exceeds 30% per annum shall not be a rate authorized or permitted by law, except if the loan or forbearance is made to a corporation, limited liability company or limited liability partnership any rate not in excess of 50% per annum shall be a rate authorized or permitted by law. Criminal usury is a crime of the second degree if the rate of interest on any loan made to any person exceeds 50% per annum or the equivalent rate for a longer or shorter period. It is a crime of the third degree if the interest rate on any loan made to any person except a corporation, limited liability company or limited liability partnership does not exceed 50% per annum but the amount of the loan or forbearance exceeds $1,000.00. Otherwise, making a loan to any person in violation of subsections a.(1) and a.(2) of this section is a disorderly persons offense. b. Business of criminal usury. Any person who knowingly engages in the business of making loans or forbearances in violation of subsection a. of this section is guilty of a crime of the second degree and, notwithstanding the provisions of N.J.S. 2C:43-3, shall be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000.00 and any other appropriate disposition authorized by N.J.S. 2C:43-2b.
    • statuteN.J. Stat. Ann. § 31:1-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, contracts for the following classes or types of loans may provide for any rate of interest which the parties agree upon, and interest at any such rate may be taken, notwithstanding that it exceeds a rate limited by paragraph (a) or (b) of this section: (1) Loans in the amount of $50,000.00 or more, except loans where the security given is a first lien on real property on which there is erected or to be erected a structure containing one, two, three, four, five or six dwelling units, a portion of which structure may be used for nonresidential purposes. The rate of interest stated in such contract upon the origination of such loans may be taken notwithstanding that payments thereon reduce the amount outstanding to less than $50,000.00;
    • statuteN.J. Stat. Ann. § 31:1-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (g) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, if the applicable rate prescribed in this subsection exceeds the rate a person would be permitted to charge in the absence of this subsection, the rate of interest which may be taken on a loan for a business or agricultural purpose in the amount of $1,000.00 or more may not exceed 5% in excess of the discount rate, including any surcharge thereon, or any 90-day commercial paper in effect at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on the day when such loan is made.
    • statuteN.J. Stat. Ann. § 31:1-3enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      In all actions to enforce any note, bill, bond, mortgage, contract, covenant, conveyance, or assurance, for the payment or delivery of any money, wares, merchandise, goods, or chattels lent, and on which a higher rate of interest shall be reserved or taken than was or is allowed by the law of the place where the contract was made or is to be performed, the amount or value actually lent, without interest or costs of the action, may be recovered, and no more. If any premium or illegal interest shall have been paid to the lender, the sum or sums so paid shall be deducted from the amount that may be due as aforesaid, and recovery had for the balance only.
    • statuteN.J. Stat. Ann. § 31:1-1.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding any provisions of R.S. 31:1-1 to the contrary, the commissioner may by regulation establish a rate of interest which may be charged by any person on loans made by them equal to the rate allowed by Federal law or regulation to be charged by national banking associations at any time when the rate so allowed by Federal law exceeds 8% per annum. Nothing herein shall authorize any person to make any loan which he is not authorized by law to make, nor shall anything in this act apply to loans secured by a first lien on real estate on which there is erected or to be erected a structure containing one, two, three, four, five or six dwelling units, a portion of which structure may also be used for nonresidential purposes. Where in any other law a rate of interest applicable to loans regulated by this section is referred to as that established by R.S. 31:1-1, the rate applicable shall be as established herein.
  17. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What interest rate can this loan carry, and what happens if it is too high?

    The civil ceiling is set by GOL § 5-501(1) by reference to Banking Law § 14-a, which fixes it: "The maximum rate of interest provided for in section 5-501 of the general obligations law shall be sixteen per centum per annum" (§ 14-a(1)). Two carve-outs sit on that ceiling before any dollar band is reached. Section 5-501(1) applies "except as provided in subdivisions five and six of this section or as otherwise provided by law", and subdivision 5 lifts every maximum-rate law off a loan insured or guaranteed by the federal housing commissioner or under the "Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944", whatever its size (§ 5-501(5)). And § 14-a itself says that nothing in it "shall be deemed to prohibit the charging of interest at the rates provided or permitted by United States Public Laws 96-161, 96-221 and 96-399, where applicable" (§ 14-a(7)). Subdivision 2 then does the prohibiting (no person or corporation shall, directly or indirectly, charge, take or receive interest at a rate exceeding the rate prescribed), and defines what counts: interest includes all amounts paid or payable, directly or indirectly, to or for the account of the lender in consideration for making the loan, as defined by the superintendent of financial services (§ 5-501(2)). A contract reserving or taking a greater sum than § 5-501 allows is VOID under GOL § 5-511(1) (except that a savings bank or savings and loan association that knowingly does so forfeits the entire interest instead), and the court is directed to declare it void, enjoin prosecution on it and order it surrendered and cancelled (§ 5-511(2)). No law regulating the maximum rate, except Penal Law §§ 190.40 and 190.42, applies to a loan or forbearance of $250,000 or more that is not secured primarily by an interest in real property improved by a one- or two-family residence (§ 5-501(6)(a)), and no such law, including those Penal Law sections, applies to a loan or forbearance of $2,500,000 or more (§ 5-501(6)(b)). A corporation may not interpose the defence of usury (§ 5-521(1)) except a defence of criminal usury under Penal Law § 190.40 (§ 5-521(3)), which requires knowingly charging, taking or receiving interest at a rate exceeding 25 percent per annum and is a class E felony. Answering two questions certified by the Second Circuit, and answering both in the affirmative, the Court of Appeals held that a usurious loan to a corporation is wholly void under the General Obligations Law, principal and interest alike, and that a stock-conversion option is to be considered in determining the interest charged (Adar Bays; opinion by Wilson, J., with Garcia, J., dissenting in part on how conversion options are valued). That second answer carries its own conditions: what is counted is the VALUE of the floating-price option, included only "to the extent such value, when measured at the time of contracting, can be reasonably determined"; the "hypothetical possibility that a future exercise of a floating-price conversion option may result in a return exceeding 25% does not render a loan usurious on its face"; that value is "a question of fact, and the burden to prove that value is on the borrower"; the Court said it had not been asked how to value such options and did "not endorse any particular methodology"; and its decision "does nothing to alter the borrower's burden of establishing usury as a defense in a civil action". The voiding itself is likewise conditional on a defence actually succeeding: criminally usurious corporate loans are void "when a successful usury defense, based on the criminal usury rate, is raised". The rate is fixed when the loan is made: interest may not exceed the rate authorized by law at that time even under a prior commitment for more, and a later change in the § 14-a rate neither invalidates an earlier loan nor lets a rate-increase clause exceed the rate authorized when the loan was made (§ 5-501(4)). Subdivision 4-a is the express exception to that, and it is written as one: "Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision four of this section", a loan repayable on demand whose initial principal is more than $5,000 and which the borrower may repay at any time, in whole or in part, without penalty may change its rate with variations in lending rates up to the rate authorized by law at the time of the change, subject to a ceiling that follows any later reduction down and a floor at the rate applicable when the loan was made (§ 5-501(4-a)). Criminal usury in the first degree (the same 25 percent, by an actor previously convicted of criminal usury or acting as part of a scheme or business of making or collecting usurious loans) is a class C felony (Penal Law § 190.42).

    The trap

    New York's remedy is forfeiture of the whole debt, not merely of the excess: Adar Bays holds that when usury is established the transaction is void and unenforceable, principal and interest alike, and that the legislature provided no exception to that voiding where the borrower is a corporation, corporate borrowers differ only in that they may raise criminal, but not civil, usury. The bands are where deals fail, and Adar Bays summarised them in 2021: loans under $250,000 to individuals cannot exceed a 16% annual rate, loans between $250,000 and $2.5 million cannot exceed 25%, and loans of $2.5 million or more are not subject to the usury laws (the 16% figure is Banking Law § 14-a(1)'s own text). Which band a deal sits in is measured on the committed total, not on the draw: a loan of $250,000 or more to be advanced in installments under a written agreement "shall be deemed to be a single loan for the total amount which the lender has agreed to advance" (§ 5-501(6)(a)), and advances aggregating $2,500,000 or more to any one borrower under a written agreement by one or more lenders are likewise a single loan or forbearance for that total (§ 5-501(6)(b)). So a $300,000 facility drawn $150,000 at a time is in the upper band, and a syndicated facility is measured across the lenders. A corporation cannot use the civil ceiling at ANY loan size; its only usury defence is criminal usury, with its knowing-charge element and 25 percent rate. Counting is the second trap, and it cuts both ways: fees and equity kickers paid to the lender in consideration of the loan count as interest under § 5-501(2), and Adar Bays counts a floating-price stock-conversion option, but what it counts is that option's VALUE "when measured at the time of contracting", and only "to the extent such value ... can be reasonably determined", the Court having declined to endorse any valuation method. The lender's side of the same holding is that the "hypothetical possibility that a future exercise of a floating-price conversion option may result in a return exceeding 25% does not render a loan usurious on its face": the option's value is "a question of fact, and the burden to prove that value is on the borrower". A corporate borrower's usury-defence waiver is void only inside that narrow carve-out: § 5-521(2) declares 'contrary to public policy and absolutely void' any contract provision or separate written instrument 'executed prior to, simultaneously with or within sixty days after the delivery of any moneys to any borrower in connection with such indebtedness, whereby the defense of usury is waived'. Section 5-521(2) is narrow: its voiding of usury-defence waivers executed before, with, or within sixty days after the loan applies within the carve-out for a corporation whose principal asset is a one- or two-family dwelling, not to corporate borrowers generally.

    as of 2026-09-16

    22 authorities

    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-501enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      1. The rate of interest, as computed pursuant to this title, upon the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action, except as provided in subdivisions five and six of this section or as otherwise provided by law, shall be six per centum per annum unless a different rate is prescribed in section fourteen-a of the banking law.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-501enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      2. No person or corporation shall, directly or indirectly, charge, take or receive any money, goods or things in action as interest on the loan or forbearance of any money, goods or things in action at a rate exceeding the rate above prescribed. The amount charged, taken or received as interest shall include any and all amounts paid or payable, directly or indirectly, by any person, to or for the account of the lender in consideration for making the loan or forbearance as defined by the superintendent of financial services pursuant to subdivision three of section fourteen-a of the banking law except such fee as may be fixed by the commissioner of taxation and finance as the cost of servicing loans made by the property and liability insurance security fund.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-511enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      1. All bonds, bills, notes, assurances, conveyances, all other contracts or securities whatsoever, except bottomry and respondentia bonds and contracts, and all deposits of goods or other things whatsoever, whereupon or whereby there shall be reserved or taken, or secured or agreed to be reserved or taken, any greater sum, or greater value, for the loan or forbearance of any money, goods or other things in action, than is prescribed in section 5-501, shall be void, except that the knowingly taking, receiving, reserving or charging such a greater sum or greater value by a savings bank, a savings and loan association or a federal savings and loan association shall only be held and adjudged a forfeiture of the entire interest which the loan or obligation carries with it or which has been agreed to be paid thereon. If a greater sum or greater value has been paid, the person paying the same or his legal representative may recover from the savings bank, the savings and loan association or the federal savings and loan association twice the entire amount of the interest thus paid.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-511enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      2. Except as provided in subdivision one, whenever it shall satisfactorily appear by the admissions of the defendant, or by proof, that any bond, bill, note, assurance, pledge, conveyance, contract, security or any evidence of debt, has been taken or received in violation of the foregoing provisions, the court shall declare the same to be void, and enjoin any prosecution thereon, and order the same to be surrendered and cancelled.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-501enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      5. No law regulating the maximum rate of interest which may be charged, taken or received shall apply to any loan or forbearance insured by the federal housing commissioner or for which a commitment to insure has been made by the federal housing commissioner or to any loan or forbearance insured or guaranteed pursuant to the provisions of an act of congress entitled "Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944."
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-501enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      6. a. No law regulating the maximum rate of interest which may be charged, taken or received, except section 190.40 and section 190.42 of the penal law, shall apply to any loan or forbearance in the amount of two hundred fifty thousand dollars or more, other than a loan or a forbearance secured primarily by an interest in real property improved by a one or two family residence. A loan of two hundred fifty thousand dollars or more which is to be advanced in installments pursuant to a written agreement by a lender shall be deemed to be a single loan for the total amount which the lender has agreed to advance pursuant to such agreement on the terms and conditions provided therein.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-501enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      b. No law regulating the maximum rate of interest which may be charged, taken or received, including section 190.40 and section 190.42 of the penal law, shall apply to any loan or forbearance in the amount of two million five hundred thousand dollars or more. Loans or forbearances aggregating two million five hundred thousand dollars or more which are to be made or advanced to any one borrower in one or more installments pursuant to a written agreement by one or more lenders shall be deemed to be a single loan or forbearance for the total amount which the lender or lenders have agreed to advance or make pursuant to such agreement on the terms and conditions provided therein.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-521enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      1. No corporation shall hereafter interpose the defense of usury in any action. The term corporation, as used in this section, shall be construed to include all associations, and joint-stock companies having any of the powers and privileges of corporations not possessed by individuals or partnerships.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-521enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      3. The provisions of subdivision one of this section shall not apply to any action in which a corporation interposes a defense of criminal usury as described in section 190.40 of the penal law.
    • statuteN.Y. PEN Law § 190.40enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A person is guilty of criminal usury in the second degree when, not being authorized or permitted by law to do so, he knowingly charges, takes or receives any money or other property as interest on the loan or forebearance of any money or other property, at a rate exceeding twenty-five per centum per annum or the equivalent rate for a longer or shorter period. Criminal usury in the second degree is a class E felony.
    • case37 N.Y.3d 320Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSys ID, Inc.N.Y.decided 2021read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Our decision today does nothing to alter the borrower’s burden of establishing usury as a defense in a civil action. Rather, we answer only that which the Second Circuit has asked: stock conversion options should be considered when determining the interest charged on a loan transaction and usurious loans to corporations are wholly void under the General Obligations Law. We have not been asked how to determine the value of stock conversion options here and do not endorse any particular methodology.
    • case37 N.Y.3d 320Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSys ID, Inc.N.Y.decided 2021read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The text, history, and purpose of New York’s usury laws demonstrate that, if the borrower establishes the defense of usury in a -4- -5- No. 51 civil action, the usurious loan transaction is deemed void and unenforceable, resulting in the uncollectability of both principal and interest. We now clarify that this same result obtains when the 25% interest rate cap set forth in Penal Law § 190.40—incorporated by reference in General Obligations Law § 5-521 (3)—applies to a loan to a corporation and the interest charged on the loan exceeds that cap.
    • case37 N.Y.3d 320Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSys ID, Inc.N.Y.decided 2021read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      General Obligations Law § 5-511 (1) provides that all loans charging an interest rate greater than that permitted in section 5-501 “shall be void.” A criminally usurious rate higher than 25% is an interest rate greater than the civil usury limit of 16% prescribed in section 5-501. The legislature provided no exceptions to the voiding of usurious loans if the borrower is a corporation. Rather, the General Obligations Law treats corporate borrowers differently only to the extent that corporate borrowers may raise criminal usury, but not civil usury, as a defense. The statutory authority, coupled with the legislative intent behind the 1965 amendment, requires the conclusion that the legislature intended for criminally usurious loans made to - 14 - - 15 - No. 51 corporate borrowers to be void when a successful usury defense, based on the criminal usury rate, is raised.
    • case37 N.Y.3d 320Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSys ID, Inc.N.Y.decided 2021read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      New York usury law is composed of General Obligations Law §§ 5-501, 5-511, 5- 521; Banking Law § 14-a (1); and Penal Law § 190.40. Together, the statutes establish that loans of less than $250,000 to individuals cannot exceed a 16% annual rate, loans between $250,000 and $2.5 million cannot exceed 25% (the criminal usury rate) and loans of $2.5 million or more are not subject to the usury laws.
    • case37 N.Y.3d 320Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSys ID, Inc.N.Y.decided 2021read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      We conclude that, in assessing whether the interest on a given loan has exceeded the statutory usury cap, the value of the floating-price6 convertible options should be included in the determination of interest. New York law requires that the value of the conversion option, like all other property exchanged in consideration for the loan, should be included in determining the loan’s interest rate for purposes of the usury statutes, to the extent such value, when measured at the time of contracting, can be reasonably determined. The hypothetical possibility that a future exercise of a floating-price conversion option may result in a return exceeding 25% does not render a loan usurious on its face. Rather, the value of such an option is a question of fact, and the burden to prove that value is on the borrower.
    • case37 N.Y.3d 320Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSys ID, Inc.N.Y.decided 2021read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Following certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and acceptance of the questions by this Court pursuant to section 500.27 of this Court's Rules of Practice, and after hearing argument by counsel for the parties and consideration of the briefs and the record submitted, certified questions answered in the affirmative. Opinion by Judge Wilson. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Fahey, Singas and Cannataro concur. Judge Garcia dissents in part in an opinion.
    • statuteN.Y. BNK Law § 14-aenactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      1. The maximum rate of interest provided for in section 5-501 of the general obligations law shall be sixteen per centum per annum. 2. The rate of interest as so prescribed under this section shall include as interest any and all amounts paid or payable, directly or indirectly, by any person, to or for the account of the lender in consideration for the making of a loan or forbearance as defined by the superintendent pursuant to subdivision three of this section.
    • statuteN.Y. BNK Law § 14-aenactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      7. Nothing contained in this section nor in any other provision of this act whereunder this section is added to the banking law shall be deemed to prohibit the charging of interest at the rates provided or permitted by United States Public Laws 96-161, 96-221 and 96-399, where applicable.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-501enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      4. Except as otherwise provided by law, interest shall not be charged, taken or received on any loan or forbearance at a rate exceeding such rate of interest as may be authorized by law at the time the loan or forbearance is made, whether or not the loan or forbearance is made pursuant to a prior contract or commitment providing for a greater rate of interest, provided, however, that no change in the rate of interest prescribed in section fourteen-a of the banking law shall affect (a) the validity of a loan or forbearance made before the date such rate becomes effective, or (b) the enforceability of such loan or forbearance in accordance with its terms, except that if any loan or forbearance provides for an increase in the rate of interest during the term of such loan or forbearance, the increased rate shall not exceed such rate of interest as may have been authorized by law at the time such loan or forbearance was made.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-501enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      4-a. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision four of this section, a loan or forbearance repayable on demand may provide for changes, reflecting variations in lending rates, from time to time in the rate of interest payable on such loan or forbearance up to the rate of interest authorized by law at the time of such change and in such case the rate of interest may be so changed in accordance with the terms of the contract or loan commitment relating thereto; provided, however, that the rate of interest charged, taken or received on such a loan or forbearance shall not exceed the rate of interest authorized by law as it may subsequently be reduced from time to time; and further provided, however, that in no event shall such a loan or forbearance by subject to an authorized rate of interest less than that applicable at the time such loan or forbearance was made. The provisions of this subdivision shall apply only to a loan or forbearance repayable on demand which has an initial principal of more than five thousand dollars and which the borrower has the right to repay at any time in whole or in part, together with accrued interest on the principal so repaid, without any penalty.
    • statuteN.Y. GOB Law § 5-521enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      2. The provisions of subdivision one of this section shall not apply to a corporation, the principal asset of which shall be the ownership of a one or two family dwelling, where it appears either that the said corporation was organized and created, or that the controlling interest therein was acquired, within a period of six months prior to the execution, by said corporation of a bond or note evidencing indebtedness, and a mortgage creating a lien for said indebtedness on the said one or two family dwelling; provided, that as to any such bond, note or mortgage executed by such a corporation and effective prior to April sixth, nineteen hundred fifty-six, the defense of usury may be interposed only in an action or proceeding instituted for the collection, enforcement or foreclosure of such note, bond or mortgage. Any provision of any contract, or any separate written instrument executed prior to, simultaneously with or within sixty days after the delivery of any moneys to any borrower in connection with such indebtedness, whereby the defense of usury is waived or any such corporation is estopped from asserting it, is hereby declared to be contrary to public policy and absolutely void.
    • statuteN.Y. PEN Law § 190.42enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A person is guilty of criminal usury in the first degree when, not being authorized or permitted by law to do so, he knowingly charges, takes or receives any money or other property as interest on the loan or forbearance of any money or other property, at a rate exceeding twenty-five per centum per annum or the equivalent rate for a longer or shorter period and either the actor had previously been convicted of the crime of criminal usury or of the attempt to commit such crime, or the actor's conduct was part of a scheme or business of making or collecting usurious loans. Criminal usury in the first degree is a class C felony.
  18. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in this North Carolina loan lawful, and can the borrower raise usury?

    It depends first on whether the loan is exempt, and most business loans are. N.C.G.S. § 24-9(a)(3) defines an 'exempt loan' as one in which the loan amount is three hundred thousand dollars or more, OR the borrower is a person other than a natural person, OR the loan is obtained by a natural person primarily for a purpose other than a personal, family or household purpose, and the same subdivision adds that whether a loan is obtained primarily for a non-consumer purpose 'shall be guided by the standards established by the federal Truth In Lending Act' and the regulations and rulings issued under it. For such a loan § 24-9(b) provides that, notwithstanding any other provision of the Chapter or of State law, the borrower may agree to pay and the lender may charge and collect interest at any rate and fees and other charges in any amount that the borrower agrees to pay, and 'a claim or defense of usury is prohibited in an exempt loan transaction'. Outside the exemption, § 24-1.1(a) (which permits a contract rate only 'except as otherwise provided in this Chapter or other applicable law') lets the parties to a loan, purchase money loan, advance, commitment for a loan or forbearance, other than a credit card, open-end or similar loan, contract in writing for interest not in excess of the rate set under subsection (c) where the principal is twenty-five thousand dollars or less, and any rate agreed upon where the principal is more than twenty-five thousand dollars. The remedy, where usury applies, is in § 24-2: knowingly taking, receiving, reserving or charging a greater rate than permitted forfeits the ENTIRE interest the note carries, and a person who has paid a greater rate may recover back twice the amount of interest paid.

    The trap

    The order of the questions is the trap, and § 24-1.1(a)'s own opening is why: it permits the written contract rate only 'except as otherwise provided in this Chapter or other applicable law', and § 24-9 is exactly such other provision. Because § 24-9(b) (which opens 'notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter or any other provision of State law') prohibits the claim or defense of usury outright in an exempt loan, a corporate or LLC borrower, a 'person other than a natural person', has no usury defense at all, whatever the rate and whatever the size of the loan; so does any borrower on a loan of $300,000 or more, and any natural person borrowing primarily for a non-consumer purpose, which § 24-9(a)(3) says is to be 'guided by the standards established by the federal Truth In Lending Act'. The $25,000 figure in § 24-1.1(a) is not a rate: below it the ceiling is the rate the Commissioner of Banks announces on the fifteenth of each month under subsection (c), the latest published noncompetitive six-month U.S. Treasury bill rate plus six percent, rounded to the nearest half percent, or sixteen percent, whichever is greater. WHICH announced rate governs turns on the kind of rate the parties agreed: the rate announced on the fifteenth is the maximum for loans made during the following calendar month 'when the parties to the loans have agreed that the rate of interest to be charged by the lender and paid by the borrower shall not vary or be adjusted during the term of the loan', while for a loan whose rate may vary the maximum in any month is the greater of the rate announced in the preceding calendar month or in the calendar month before the adjustment. Section 24-1 is a different thing again: its whole operative text is 'except as otherwise provided in G.S. 136-113, the legal rate of interest shall be eight percent (8%) per annum for such time as interest may accrue, and no more', while § 24-1.1(a) separately permits a written contract rate; no North Carolina opinion was read on how the two fit together, so do not treat the eight percent as a contract ceiling on the strength of those two texts alone. One hard ceiling in the Chapter is not a Treasury formula at all: § 24-1.1(e)(3) caps the annual percentage rate at thirty-six percent, inclusive of that subsection's origination fees and the interest permitted by (c), where the principal is under five thousand dollars, the borrower is a natural person and the debt is incurred primarily for personal, family or household purposes; and § 24-1.1(f) says the section 'does not limit fees on loans or extensions of credit in excess of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000)'. Two bank carve-outs sit inside § 24-9 itself. Subsection (c) lets a bank charge any agreed rate and fees on a qualifying equity line of credit, but 'an equity line of credit made by a bank shall be subject to the following, to the extent otherwise applicable' (the high-cost home loan provisions of G.S. 24-1.1E and the consumer protections of G.S. 24-10.2, neither of which was read for this question), and it also limits the prepayment fees a bank may charge on the fixed-rate portion of such a line. Subsection (d) lets a bank charge any agreed rate on a revolving credit card plan, but 'this subsection (d) shall not apply to a revolving credit card plan that is secured by a mortgage or deed of trust on real property'. Federal preemption of State rate limits was not read and is not addressed here, and neither were §§ 24-1.1E, 24-10 or 24-10.2. One thing § 24-1.1 does not licence, whatever rate applies: 'Nothing in this section authorizes the charging of interest on committed funds prior to the disbursement of the funds.' A commitment fee is not interest on money that has not gone out the door.

    as of 2026-09-17

    10 authorities

    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      "Exempt loan" means a loan in which: a. The loan amount is three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) or more; or b. The borrower is a person other than a natural person; or c. The loan is obtained by a natural person primarily for a purpose other than a personal, family, or household purpose. Whether a loan is obtained primarily for a purpose other than a personal, family, or household purpose shall be guided by the standards established by the federal Truth In Lending Act (Title 1 of Public Law 90-321; 82 Stat. 146; 15 U.S.C. § 160, et seq.) and all regulations and rulings issued pursuant to that Act, as the same may be amended from time to time.
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter or any other provision of State law, any borrower in an exempt loan transaction may agree to pay, and any lender, including a bank, may charge and collect from the borrower, interest at any rate and fees and other charges in any amount that the borrower agrees to pay. A claim or defense of usury is prohibited in an exempt loan transaction.
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (c) The provisions of G.S. 24-1.2A, 24-11, and 24-11.1 shall not apply to equity lines of credit offered by banks. Except as provided in this subsection and notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter or any other provision of State law, any bank may charge and collect from any borrower interest at any rate and fees and other charges in any amount that the borrower agrees to pay in connection with an equity line of credit. However, an equity line of credit made by a bank shall be subject to the following, to the extent otherwise applicable: (1) The provisions of G.S. 24-1.1E (relating to restrictions and limitations on high-cost home loans). (2) The provisions of G.S. 24-10.2 (relating to consumer protections in certain home loans).
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-9enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (d) The provisions of G.S. 24-11 and G.S. 24-11.1 shall not apply to revolving credit card plans offered by banks. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter or any other provision of State law, any bank may charge and collect from any borrower interest at any rate, as well as fees and other charges in any amount that the borrower agrees to pay in connection with a revolving credit card plan. This subsection (d) shall not apply to a revolving credit card plan that is secured by a mortgage or deed of trust on real property.
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-1.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter or other applicable law, the parties to a loan, purchase money loan, advance, commitment for a loan, or forbearance, other than a credit card, open-end, or similar loan, may contract in writing for the payment of interest not in excess of the following: (1) Where the principal amount is twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) or less, the rate set under subsection (c) of this section. (2) Any rate agreed upon by the parties where the principal amount is more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The taking, receiving, reserving or charging a greater rate of interest than permitted by this chapter or other applicable law, either before or after the interest may accrue, when knowingly done, shall be a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note or other evidence of debt carries with it, or which has been agreed to be paid thereon. And in case a greater rate of interest has been paid, the person or his legal representatives or corporation by whom it has been paid, may recover back twice the amount of interest paid in an action in the nature of action for debt.
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-1.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (b) As used in this section, interest shall not be deemed in excess of the rates provided where interest is computed monthly on the outstanding principal balance and is collected not more than 31 days in advance of its due date. Nothing in this section authorizes the charging of interest on committed funds prior to the disbursement of the funds.
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-1.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (c) On the fifteenth day of each month, the Commissioner of Banks shall announce and publish the maximum rate of interest permitted by subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of this section on that date. The rate shall be the latest published noncompetitive rate for U.S. Treasury bills with a six-month maturity as of the fifteenth day of the month plus six percent (6%), rounded upward or downward, as the case may be, to the nearest one-half of one percent (1/2 of 1%) or sixteen percent (16%), whichever is greater. If there is no nearest one-half of one percent (1/2 of 1%), the Commissioner shall round downward to the lower one-half of one percent (1/2 of 1%). The rate so announced shall be the maximum rate permitted for the term of loans made under this section during the following calendar month when the parties to the loans have agreed that the rate of interest to be charged by the lender and paid by the borrower shall not vary or be adjusted during the term of the loan. The parties to a loan made under this section may agree to a rate of interest that shall vary or be adjusted during the term of the loan in which case the maximum rate of interest permitted on the loans during a month during the term of the loan shall be the greater of the rate announced by the Commissioner in (i) the preceding calendar month or (ii) the calendar month preceding that in which the rate is varied or adjusted.
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-1.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (3) If (i) the loan or extension of credit has a principal amount less than five thousand dollars ($5,000), (ii) the borrower is a natural person, and (iii) the debt is incurred primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, the loan or extension of credit shall not have an annual percentage rate that exceeds thirty-six percent (36%), inclusive of the origination fees permitted by this subsection and the interest permitted by subsection (c) of this section. For purposes of this subsection, "annual percentage rate" shall be calculated in accordance with the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, Chapter 41 of Title 15 of the United States Code, (Truth in Lending Act) and the regulations adopted under it. (f) This section does not limit fees on loans or extensions of credit in excess of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000).
    • statuteN.C.G.S. § 24-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as otherwise provided in G.S. 136-113, the legal rate of interest shall be eight percent (8%) per annum for such time as interest may accrue, and no more.
  19. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Can we charge a monthly late-payment finance charge on this account under North Dakota law, and does our contract need to say so?

    Yes, without a contractual finance-charge clause, but only within statutory limits and conditions. N.D.C.C. § 13-01-14(1)-(2): "A creditor may charge, receive, and collect a late payment charge on all money due on account from thirty days after the obligation of the debtor to pay has been incurred," and "[t]he late payment charge allowed under this section may not exceed one and three-fourths percent per month." Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc. explains when the statute, rather than the contract, does the work: "This Court has recognized N.D.C.C. §§ 13-01-14 and 13-01-15 apply to finance charges on accounts receivable when no contractual provision explicitly authorizes the finance charges."

    The trap

    The 1.75%-per-month cap is not the only condition: § 13-01-14(3) makes the charge unavailable at all "unless, when the obligation was incurred, the creditor did not intend to extend any credit beyond thirty days and any late payment of the obligation was unanticipated," a fact-specific, at-formation intent test that a creditor who knowingly extends longer-term credit cannot satisfy. Separately, § 13-01-15 bars the charge outright unless the creditor "promptly supplies the debtor with a statement as of the end of each monthly period ... in which there is any unpaid balance." And the statute carves out three categories entirely (retail installment contracts, revolving charge accounts, and medical-bill accounts receivable, each governed by its own separate chapter), so this section does not answer a late-fee question for those transaction types. Failing a condition does not merely cost the charge, it reshapes the award. Titan Machinery recounts Royal Jewelers, where without § 13-01-14 the creditor "would be limited to the presumed rate of interest of 6% per annum under N.D.C.C. § 47-14-05" and this Court "reversed and remanded the award of late payment charges for findings on the predicate facts for the applicability of N.D.C.C. § 13-01-14," and Titan Machinery did the same thing because the findings "did not address late payment charges or the predicate facts for the applicability of N.D.C.C. §§ 13-01-14 and 13-01-15 as a component of damages." The § 13-01-15 statement is a list and not a line: it must state the percentage charge, "[t]he unpaid balance at the end of the period," an identification of any amount debited during the period, the payments made by or for the debtor, and "[t]he amount of the late payment charge."

    as of 2026-09-21

    9 authorities

    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-14enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A creditor may charge, receive, and collect a late payment charge on all money due on account from thirty days after the obligation of the debtor to pay has been incurred. A creditor may assign an account receivable that is subject to this section. An assignee of an account receivable has the same right to charge a late payment charge as does an original creditor for the assigned account receivable.
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-14enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The late payment charge allowed under this section may not exceed one and three-fourths percent per month.
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-14enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The late payment charge allowed under this section may not be charged unless, when the obligation was incurred, the creditor did not intend to extend any credit beyond thirty days and any late payment of the obligation was unanticipated.
    • case874 N.W.2d 317Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc.N.D.decided 2016read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      This Court has recognized N.D.C.C. §§ 13-01-14 and 13-01-15 apply to finance charges on accounts receivable when no contractual provision explicitly authorizes the finance charges. See Industrial Fiberglass v. Jandt, 361 N.W.2d 595, 600 (N.D.1985); Metric Constr., Inc. *323 v. Great Plains Properties, 344 N.W.2d 679, 682-83 (N.D.1984).
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-15enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Such statement must state, in any order, the following: - The percentage amount of the late payment charge which will be charged beginning thirty days after the obligation is incurred for purposes of section 13-01-14, or beginning after the billed medical services become delinquent for purposes of section 13-01-14.1. - The unpaid balance at the end of the period. - An identification of any amount debited to the debtor's account during the period. - The payments made by or for the debtor to the creditor during the period. - The amount of the late payment charge. - Additional items may be included in the statement to explain the computations made in determining the amount to be paid by the debtor.
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-14enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This section does not apply to: - Money due on retail installment contracts, as defined in chapter 51-13. - Money due on revolving charge accounts, as defined in chapter 51-14. - Money due a medical services provider on accounts receivable for medical bills.
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-15enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A creditor may not charge the account receivable late payment charge provided for under section 13-01-14 or 13-01-14.1 unless the creditor promptly supplies the debtor with a statement as of the end of each monthly period, or other regular period agreed upon by the creditor and the debtor, in which there is any unpaid balance.
    • case874 N.W.2d 317Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc.N.D.decided 2016read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      This Court said no evidence existed of a written contract authorizing finance charges, and “unless [N.D.C.C. § ] 13-01-14 applie[d], there [was] no legal or contractual basis for a 1.5% per month finance charge, and [the creditor] would be limited to the presumed rate of interest of 6% per annum under N.D.C.C. § 47-14-05.” Royal Jewelers, at 527. This Court concluded no findings existed about whether the creditor intended to extend credit to the debtor beyond thirty days or whether late payment was anticipated under N.D.C.C. § 13-01-14. Royal Jewelers, at 527. This Court reversed and remanded the award of late payment charges for findings on the predicate facts for the applicability of N.D.C.C. § 13-01-14. Royal Jewelers, at 527.
    • case874 N.W.2d 317Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc.N.D.decided 2016read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The court’s findings, however, did not address late payment charges or the predicate facts for the applicability of N.D.C.C. §§ 13-01-14 and 13-01-15 as a component of damages. We are unable to understand the basis for the court’s decision regarding late payment charges as a component of Patterson’s obligations to Titan. We reverse the judgment and remand for findings addressing this issue.
    read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Does North Dakota cap the interest rate this contract can charge, and does it matter whether the interest runs before or after maturity?

    Yes, but the cap and its penalty apply only to PRE-maturity interest, and a different, separate statute governs interest after maturity. N.D.C.C. § 47-14-09 caps agreed interest at "five and one-half percent per annum higher than the current cost of money as reflected by the average rate of interest payable on United States treasury bills maturing in six months" for North Dakota, with a floor of seven percent, and bars charging interest on overdue interest except by a separate contract to pay a lawful rate on interest already overdue: "A contract may not provide for the payment of interest on interest overdue, but this section does not apply to a contract to pay interest at a lawful rate on interest that is overdue at the time such contract is made." A violation carries a real penalty under N.D.C.C. § 47-14-10: "The taking, receiving, reserving, or charging of a rate of interest greater than is allowed by the laws of this state relative to usury shall be deemed a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note, bill, or other evidence of debt carries with it or which has been agreed to be paid thereon, and in addition thereto, a forfeiture of twenty-five percent of the principal thereof." T.F. James Co. v. Vakoch confirms § 47-14-09 governs only interest charged before maturity: "interest before maturity is compensation for the use of money and is regulated by Section 47-14-09, N.D.C.C., and that interest allowed after maturity is considered compensation for damages for the wrongful detention of money and is regulated by Section 47-14-05, N.D.C.C."

    The trap

    A late-fee or post-maturity interest clause is NOT tested against § 47-14-09's usury cap or § 47-14-10's forfeiture penalty at all: T.F. James held that once interest is characterized as compensation for the wrongful detention of money after maturity rather than compensation for the use of money before it, "section 47-14-05, N.D.C.C., applies to the transaction, not N.D.C.C. § 47-14-09," and § 47-14-05 ("Interest for any legal indebtedness must be at the rate of six percent per annum unless a different rate not to exceed the rate specified in section 47-14-09 is contracted for in writing," with contracts bearing "the same rate of interest after maturity as they bear before maturity" unless otherwise agreed in writing) carries no usury label and no § 47-14-10 forfeiture of its own; T.F. James reversed the usury penalties and remanded for § 47-14-05 to be applied. That is not the same as no limit, and the row's answer should not be read that way: T.F. James says in terms that "[u]nder section 47-14-05, N.D.C.C., post-maturity interest rates and late fees are limited," and the section's own closing sentence conditions the charge, "A charge for a late payment penalty may be imposed only if the amount of the late charge or the method of calculation of the late charge has been agreed to by the parties in the loan documents that are signed by the borrower." Section 47-14-10 also carries more than the forfeiture quoted above: a payer of usurious interest may "[r]ecover back twice the amount of interest thus paid, together with twenty-five percent of the principal," but "an action must be commenced for such purpose within four years after the time when the usurious transaction occurred." Section 47-14-09 also carries its own wide exclusions that a drafter should check before assuming the floating cap applies: it does not reach a loan made to a corporation, LLC, cooperative, or trust; a loan to a partnership or association that files a partnership tax return; a loan or forbearance over $35,000; or a loan by a regulated lending institution, and state-chartered banks and the Bank of North Dakota may instead charge whatever rate is lawful for national banks or federally chartered savings institutions operating in the state.

    as of 2026-09-21

    10 authorities

    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 47-14-09enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as otherwise provided by the laws of this state, a person, either directly or indirectly, may not take or receive, or agree to take or receive, in money, goods, or things in action, or in any other way, any greater sum or greater value for the loan or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action than five and one-half percent per annum higher than the current cost of money as reflected by the average rate of interest payable on United States treasury bills maturing in six months in effect for North Dakota for the six months immediately preceding the month in which the transaction occurs, as computed and declared on the last day of each month by the state banking commissioner, but that in any event the maximum allowable interest rate ceiling may not be less than seven percent, and in the computation of interest the same may not be compounded; provided, however, that a minimum interest charge of fifteen dollars may be made. A contract may not provide for the payment of interest on interest overdue, but this section does not apply to a contract to pay interest at a lawful rate on interest that is overdue at the time such contract is made. Any violation of this section is deemed usury.
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 47-14-09enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This section does not apply to a: - Bona fide pawnbroking transaction in an amount not exceeding ten thousand dollars which is made by a bona fide pawnbroking business transacted under a pawnbroker's license; - Loan made to a foreign or domestic corporation, foreign or domestic limited liability company, cooperative corporation or association, or trust; - Loan made to a partnership, limited partnership, or association that files a state or federal partnership income tax return; - Loan or forbearance of money, goods, or things in action the principal amount of which amounts to more than thirty-five thousand dollars; and - Loan made by a lending institution which is regulated or funded by an agency of a state or of the federal government.
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 47-14-09enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding the interest rate limit set under this section, state-chartered banks and the Bank of North Dakota may charge interest at a rate equal to the maximum allowable rate which lawfully may be charged for a particular type of loan by national banking associations or state or federally chartered savings and loan associations operating out of facilities located in this state.
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 47-14-10enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The taking, receiving, reserving, or charging of a rate of interest greater than is allowed by the laws of this state relative to usury shall be deemed a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note, bill, or other evidence of debt carries with it or which has been agreed to be paid thereon, and in addition thereto, a forfeiture of twenty-five percent of the principal thereof. In case the greater rate of interest has been paid, the person by whom it has been paid, or that person's legal representative may: - Recover back twice the amount of interest thus paid, together with twenty-five percent of the principal from the person taking or receiving the same, but an action must be commenced for such purpose within four years after the time when the usurious transaction occurred; or - Offset twice the amount of such interest against any indebtedness which the person who paid the same owes to the party or parties receiving such usurious interest.
    • case604 N.W.2d 459T.F. James Co. v. VakochN.D.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      interest before maturity is compensation for the use of money and is regulated by Section 47-14-09, N.D.C.C., and that interest allowed after maturity is considered compensation for damages for the wrongful detention of money and is regulated by Section 47-14-05, N.D.C.C.
    • case604 N.W.2d 459T.F. James Co. v. VakochN.D.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Although sections 47-14-05 and 47-14-09 have been amended since Dallea, their core language has not changed. 3 It is apparent the interest charged here was not before maturity, nor was it compensation for the use of money. It was compensation for damages for the wrongful detention of money. As such, section 47-14-05, N.D.C.C., applies to the transaction, not N.D.C.C. § 47-14-09.
    • statuteN.D.C.C. § 47-14-05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Interest for any legal indebtedness must be at the rate of six percent per annum unless a different rate not to exceed the rate specified in section 47-14-09 is contracted for in writing. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing, all contracts must bear the same rate of interest after maturity as they bear before maturity. A charge for a late payment penalty may be imposed only if the amount of the late charge or the method of calculation of the late charge has been agreed to by the parties in the loan documents that are signed by the borrower.
    • case604 N.W.2d 459T.F. James Co. v. VakochN.D.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Because the lease is not subject to North Dakota’s usury statute, we reverse.
    • case604 N.W.2d 459T.F. James Co. v. VakochN.D.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      We reverse the district court’s decision applying usury to the lease and remand this case to the district court to apply N.D.C.C. § 47-14-05 to James’ recovery under the lease and reconsider its decision not to award attorney’s fees.
    • case604 N.W.2d 459T.F. James Co. v. VakochN.D.decided 2000read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Under section 47-14-05, N.D.C.C., post-maturity interest rates and late fees are limited. Royal Jewelers, Inc. v. Kopp, 365 N.W.2d 525, 527 (N.D.1985) (holding Royal Jewelers was entitled only to interest allowed under 47-14-05 where customer was charged “service charges” for the balance on an open account). Unlike section 47-14-09, however, a violation of 47-14-05 does not constitute usury. See Dallea, 152 N.W.2d at 418-20 (finding N.D.C.C. § 47-14-05 applies to the note, but the note is not usurious).
  20. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What interest rate can we charge, and what does the contract have to say to get it?

    R.C. 1343.01(A), as the Ninth District set it out, provides that the parties to a promissory note may stipulate therein for the payment of interest upon the amount thereof at any rate not exceeding eight per cent per annum payable annually. Where R.C. 1343.01 does not apply, R.C. 1343.03(A) entitles the creditor, when money becomes due and payable upon a judgment for the payment of money arising out of a contract, to interest at the rate determined under R.C. 5703.47, unless a written contract provides a different rate of interest in relation to the money, so a judgment creditor is entitled to a contractual rate instead of the statutory rate when the parties have a written contract and that contract provides a rate of interest with respect to money that becomes due and payable.

    The trap

    The contractual rate has to be in the right document. In Designers Choice the asset purchase agreement stated a purchase price of $355,000 and had no language about interest rates, while a separate promissory note said there would be no interest on that balance, repaid over 96 monthly instalments. Saying no interest accrues is not the same as stating a rate: because neither instrument gave a rate of interest for amounts that had become due and payable, and the acceleration clause said nothing about interest after acceleration or judgment, the creditor got the statutory rate anyway. The eight per cent figure in R.C. 1343.01(A) is the ceiling that subsection sets for a stipulation in a promissory note, and the exemptions and licensee provisions that displace a general usury ceiling in other states are not quoted in any authority listed here: no Ohio statutory text was available to check, so nothing in this rule tells you whether a particular lender or borrower is outside the section.

    as of 2026-09-17

    6 authorities

    • case2020-Ohio-4617Designers Choice, Inc. v. Attractive Floorings, L.L.C.Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist.decided 2020
      Show the words that state the rule
      Section 1343.01(A) provides that the parties to a promissory note “may stipulate therein for the payment of interest upon the amount thereof at any rate not exceeding eight per cent per annum payable annually * * *.”
    • case2020-Ohio-4617Designers Choice, Inc. v. Attractive Floorings, L.L.C.Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist.decided 2020
      Show the words that state the rule
      “Therefore, a judgment creditor is entitled to a contractual interest rate instead of the statutory rate ‘when (1) the parties have a written contract, and (2) that contract provides a rate of interest with respect to money that becomes due and payable.’” John Soliday Fin. Group, LLC v. Stutzman, 9th Dist. Wayne No. 08CA0046, 2009-Ohio-2081, ¶ 7, quoting First Bank of Ohio v. Wigfield, 10th Dist. Franklin Nos. 07AP-561, 07AP-562, 2008-Ohio-1278, ¶ 20.
    • case2020-Ohio-4617Designers Choice, Inc. v. Attractive Floorings, L.L.C.Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist.decided 2020
      Show the words that state the rule
      Section 1343.03(A) provides that, “when money becomes due and payable upon any * * * note, * * * the creditor is entitled to interest at the rate per annum determined pursuant to section 5703.47 of the Revised Code, unless a written contract provides a different rate of interest in relation to the money that becomes due and payable * * *.”
    • case2020-Ohio-4617Designers Choice, Inc. v. Attractive Floorings, L.L.C.Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist.decided 2020
      Show the words that state the rule
      Section 1343.03(A) provides that, “[i]n cases other than those provided for in section[ ] 1343.01 * * *,” “when money becomes due and payable upon any * * * judgment[ ] * * * for the payment of money arising out of * * * a contract * * *, the creditor is entitled to interest at the rate * * * determined pursuant to section 5703.47 * * *, unless a written contract provides a different rate of interest in relation to the money * * *.”
    • case2020-Ohio-4617Designers Choice, Inc. v. Attractive Floorings, L.L.C.Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist.decided 2020
      Show the words that state the rule
      The asset purchase agreement indicated that the purchase price was $355,000. It did not have any language regarding interest rates. A separate promissory note, however, detailed that there would be “no interest thereon” the $355,000, meaning that Attractive Floorings would repay the balance by making 96 monthly payments of $3,697.92.
    • case2020-Ohio-4617Designers Choice, Inc. v. Attractive Floorings, L.L.C.Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist.decided 2020
      Show the words that state the rule
      Although the parties’ agreement provided that no interest would accrue on the initial balance, allowing Attractive Floorings to space its payment of the $355,000 over 96 months, there is no language in the contract concerning the rate of interest that would apply to amounts that had become due and payable. The promissory note’s acceleration clause also does not provide that no interest will apply if the entire amount remaining immediately becomes due and payable or in the event of a judgment against Attractive Floorings. Accordingly, because the asset purchase agreement and promissory note do not provide “a different rate of interest in relation to the money that becomes due and payable,” we conclude that Designers Choice was entitled to post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. R.C. 1343.03(A). Designers Choice’s fourth assignment of error is sustained.
  21. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What interest can an Oregon lender charge, and what happens if the cap is exceeded?

    Where the parties have not otherwise agreed to a rate, the rate of interest is nine percent per annum, payable on all moneys after they become due (with open accounts bearing interest from the date of the last item), on money received to the use of another and retained beyond a reasonable time, and on money due under a contract to pay interest at no specified rate (ORS 82.010(1)). Where the parties do agree a rate, the cap is narrow: except as ORS 82.025 provides, no person may make a business or agricultural loan of $50,000 or less, or any other loan of $50,000 or less, at an annual rate of interest exceeding the greater of 12 percent or five percent in excess of the discount rate (for business or agricultural loans, including any surcharge on the discount rate) on 90-day commercial paper in effect at the Federal Reserve Bank in the Federal Reserve district where the lender is located on the date the loan or initial advance is made (ORS 82.010(3)). A person who violates subsection (3) forfeits the right to collect or receive any interest on the loan, and the borrower is required to repay only the principal amount borrowed (82.010(4)). A commission, bonus, fee, premium, penalty or other charge paid by or at the expense of the borrower to the lender or its broker, officer, director or agent, with the lender's knowledge, as consideration for obtaining the loan or a renewal, extension or forbearance, is deemed part of the interest (82.020(1)), subject to the exclusions in 82.020(3); and in computing interest for 82.010 a bona fide commission paid or sustained by the borrower is computed for the contract term, not for an accelerated period or a prepayment (82.020(2)). ORS 82.010(3)-(4) and 82.020 do not apply to financial institutions and trust companies as defined in ORS 706.008, consumer finance licensees, licensed pawnbrokers, HUD-approved lenders, loans secured by a first lien on real property or made to finance the acquisition of real property and secured by any lien on that property, and five further categories in 82.025: a loan secured by real property and scheduled to be repaid in substantially equal payments by a lender who makes, invests in or arranges more than $1 million of real property loans a year, where no single scheduled payment is more than twice any other (82.025(4)); a loan guaranteed or insured by the Federal Housing Administration, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or Rural Development, the Farm Service Agency or any other federal body or wholly owned federal corporation (5); a federally permitted loan from a tax qualified retirement plan to a participant (6); a bona fide sale or resale of securities or commercial paper (7); and a registered broker-dealer's interest charge for carrying a customer's demand debit balance secured by stocks or bonds (8). 'Financial institution' in ORS 706.008 means an insured institution, an extranational institution, a credit union as defined in ORS 723.006, an out-of-state credit union under ORS 723.042 or a federal credit union. Judgments are governed separately: the rate on a money judgment is nine percent, simple unless the contract provides otherwise, accruing from entry and also on interest, attorney fees and costs entered as part of the judgment, except that a judgment on a contract bearing more than nine percent carries the contract rate as of the date of entry (82.010(2)).

    The trap

    The cap reaches only loans of $50,000 or less, and does not apply to the lenders and loans listed in 82.025, which include any financial institution or trust company, any consumer finance or pawnbroker licensee, any loan secured by a first lien on real property, and, under 82.025(4), any substantially-equal-payment loan secured by real property from a lender writing more than $1 million of real property loans a year, which covers much of the professional lending market. Acceleration does not inflate the rate either: a bona fide commission is spread over the contract term rather than the accelerated period (82.020(2)). Where it does apply, the lender forfeits all interest, not just the excess (82.010(4)), and a fee or bonus paid for the loan counts toward the rate (82.020(1)).

    as of 2026-09-17

    10 authorities

    • statuteORS 82.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The rate of interest for the following transactions, if the parties have not otherwise agreed to a rate of interest, is nine percent per annum and is payable on: (a) All moneys after they become due; but open accounts bear interest from the date of the last item thereof. (b) Money received to the use of another and retained beyond a reasonable time without the owner’s express or implied consent. (c) Money due or to become due where there is a contract to pay interest and no rate specified.
    • statuteORS 82.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as provided in this subsection, the rate of interest on judgments for the payment of money is nine percent per annum. The following apply as described: (a) Interest on a judgment under this subsection accrues from the date of the entry of the judgment unless the judgment specifies another date. (b) Interest on a judgment under this subsection is simple interest, unless otherwise provided by contract. (c) Interest accruing from the date of the entry of a judgment shall also accrue on interest that accrued before the date of entry of a judgment. (d) Interest under this subsection shall also accrue on attorney fees and costs entered as part of the judgment. (e) A judgment on a contract bearing more than nine percent interest shall bear interest at the same rate provided in the contract as of the date of entry of the judgment.
    • statuteORS 82.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as provided in ORS 82.025, no person shall: (a) Make a business or agricultural loan of $50,000 or less at an annual rate of interest exceeding the greater of 12 percent, or five percent in excess of the discount rate, including any surcharge on the discount rate, on 90-day commercial paper in effect at the Federal Reserve Bank in the Federal Reserve district where the person making the loan is located, on the date the loan or the initial advance of funds under the loan is made; or (b) Make a loan of $50,000 or less, except a loan made under paragraph (a) of this subsection, at an annual rate of interest exceeding the greater of 12 percent, or five percent in excess of the discount rate on 90-day commercial paper in effect at the Federal Reserve Bank in the Federal Reserve district where the person making the loan is located, on the date the loan or the initial advance of funds under the loan is made.
    • statuteORS 82.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any person who violates subsection (3) of this section shall forfeit the right to collect or receive any interest upon any loan for which a greater rate of interest or consideration than is permitted by subsection (3) of this section has been charged, contracted for or received. The borrower upon such loan shall be required to repay only the principal amount borrowed.
    • statuteORS 82.020enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      If, pursuant to any arrangement, understanding or agreement, with the knowledge of the lender, either as a part of the contract of borrowing or collateral thereto, regardless of when made and whether it is made as a special arrangement or in conformity to a regular rule, regulation or practice, there is paid by or at the expense of the borrower to the lender, or the lender’s broker, officer, director or agent, with respect to or in connection with any loan to which ORS 82.010 applies, any commission, bonus, fee, premium, penalty or other charge, compensation or gratuity, whether in money, credit or other thing of value, as a consideration, compensation or inducement for obtaining any such loan, or any renewal, extension of forbearance thereof, the same shall be deemed a part of the interest charged on such loan.
    • statuteORS 82.020enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      In computing interest for the purposes of ORS 82.010, any bona fide commission paid or sustained by the borrower shall be computed for the contract term and not for any accelerated period or prepayment.
    • statuteORS 82.020enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, the following charges shall not be deemed a part of the interest charged on a loan: (a) Reasonable amounts actually applied in payment of the expense of inspecting any security offered in connection with the loan, investigating the responsibility of the applicant or procuring or extending any abstract of title or certificate of title insurance covering such security; (b) The amount actually paid for the examination of any such abstract of title or certificate of insurance; or (c) The cost of the preparation, execution and recording of any papers necessary in consummating such loan.
    • statuteORS 82.025enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      ORS 82.010 (3) and (4) and 82.020 do not apply to: (1) Any financial institution or trust company, as those terms are defined in ORS 706.008, any consumer finance licensee under ORS chapter 725 or any pawnbroker licensed under ORS chapter 726. (2) Any lender approved by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of the United States for participation in any mortgage insurance program under the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). (3) Any loan secured by a first lien on real property or made to finance the acquisition of real property and secured by any lien on that property.
    • statuteORS 82.025enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any loan that is secured by real property, scheduled under the loan agreement to be repaid in substantially equal payments and made by a lender described in this subsection. A lender under this subsection is one who makes, invests in or arranges real property loans, including loans secured by first liens on residential manufactured homes, aggregating more than $1 million per year. Under this subsection, payments shall be substantially equal if, under the terms of the loan agreement, no single scheduled payment is more than twice the amount of any other scheduled payment. (5) Any loan wholly or partially secured or covered by guarantees or insurance by the Federal Housing Administration, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or Rural Development or the Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, any department, bureau, board, commission or agency of the United States, or any corporation wholly owned, directly or indirectly by the United States. (6) Any loan permitted under applicable federal law and regulations from a tax qualified retirement plan to a person then a participant under the plan. (7) Any bona fide sale or resale of securities or commercial paper. (8) Any interest charge by broker-dealers registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for carrying a debit balance in an account for a customer if the debit balance is payable on demand and secured by stocks or bonds.
    • statuteORS 706.008enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      “Financial institution” means an insured institution, an extranational institution, a credit union as defined in ORS 723.006, an out-of-state credit union under ORS 723.042 or a federal credit union.
  22. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in our Rhode Island contract capped, and what happens if we go over?

    Yes, and going over voids the whole contract, not just the excess. Section 6-26-2(a) forbids any person or entity “loaning money to or negotiating the loan of money for another, except duly licensed pawnbrokers”, to “reserve, charge, or take interest on a loan, whether before or after maturity, at a rate that shall exceed the greater of twenty-one percent (21%) per annum or the alternate rate specified in subsection (b)”, and (b)’s alternate rate is “nine percentage points (9%) plus” the Wall Street Journal domestic prime rate on the last business day of the month preceding the agreement or the redetermination. The consequence in § 6-26-4(a) is total: “Every contract made in violation of any of the provisions of § 6-26-2, and every mortgage, pledge, deposit, or assignment made or given as security for the performance of the contract, shall be usurious and void”, and under (c) a borrower who paid “either of principal or interest” may recover it back. A willing and knowing violation is criminal usury punishable by up to five years (§ 6-26-3). In NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital, LLC the Supreme Court held the statute imposes “an inflexible, hardline approach to usury that is tantamount to strict liability”, that “[u]surious interest rates are to be avoided at all costs and the onus is on the lender”, and, as a matter of first impression, “that, in loan contracts such as the instant loan, usury savings clauses are unenforceable as against the well-established public policy of preventing usurious transactions.” Three carve-outs are inside the chapter and must be read with it: § 6-26-2(d) hands credit-card transactions to ch. 6-26.1 exclusively; § 6-26-2(e) removes any rate limit for a loan to a COMMERCIAL ENTITY over $1,000,000 not secured by a mortgage on any borrower’s principal residence, but only if “the commercial entity has first obtained a pro forma methods analysis performed by a certified public accountant licensed in the state of Rhode Island indicating that the loan is capable of being repaid”; and § 6-26-4(d) removes regulated financial institutions from § 6-26-4(a)-(c) entirely and substitutes forfeiture of “the entire interest on the debt” plus a two-year action for twice the interest paid. Section 6-26-5 exempts licensed pawnbrokers from §§ 6-26-2 through 6-26-4, and § 6-26-2(a) is expressly “Subject to the provisions of title 19”.

    The trap

    The $1,000,000 commercial exemption is a paperwork trap, and NV One is the case that shows it closing on a lender. The Court found the loan “surely qualified for the exception” (commercial parties, over $1,000,000, no principal-residence mortgage), but “[b]y not securing the requisite pro forma analysis, PRC failed to avail itself of the exception and is therefore bound by the maximum interest rate.” The Rhode Island-licensed CPA opinion has to exist BEFORE the loan; there is no cure afterwards. Nor does the boilerplate save it: the clause NV One held unenforceable was the ordinary one, section 4.4 of the note, reciting an intention to conform strictly to the usury laws in force and limiting every agreement between the parties so that no contingency could produce a higher rate. Giving such a clause effect “would entirely obviate any responsibility on the part of the lender to abide by the usury statute, and would, in essence, swallow the rule.” Rhode Island also computes the rate against what the borrower actually got: § 6-26-2(a) measures against “the unpaid principal balance of the net proceeds of the loan”, so origination fees and undisbursed holdbacks push the effective rate up. Two more edges. A recovery under § 6-26-4(c) belongs to the borrower who paid: in Commerce Park Realty, LLC v. HR2-A Corp. the Court rejected the argument that “so long as one named borrower makes a payment on a usurious loan, all named borrowers may share in the disgorgement payments”, so a guarantor or a co-borrower who paid nothing recovers nothing even though the loan (26% to 36% per annum) was “usurious and null and void”. And the defence can be given up: DeFusco v. Giorgio holds that “waiver of a usury defense should be permitted when it is freely and knowingly made after reasoned reflection for the legitimate purpose of avoiding or settling litigation”, while expressly reserving the case of “a release of all claims or defenses of usury either contemporaneous with the signing of a promissory note or in exchange for additional advances of funds”, which is the release a lender would actually want.

    as of 2026-09-20

    27 authorities

    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The alternate rate means the rate per annum that is equal to nine percentage points (9%) plus an index that is the domestic prime rate as published in the Money Rates section of The Wall Street Journal on the last business day of each month preceding the later of the date of the debtor’s agreement or the date on which the interest rate is redetermined in accordance with the terms of the debtor’s agreement.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      the provisions of this chapter shall not be applicable with respect to credit card transactions as defined in chapter 26.1 of this title. Chapter 26.1 shall apply exclusively to all such transactions.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      there is no limitation on the rate of interest that may be legally charged for the loan to, or use of money by, a commercial entity, where the amount of money loaned exceeds the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) and where repayment of the loan is not secured by a mortgage against the principal residence of any borrower; provided, that the commercial entity has first obtained a pro forma methods analysis performed by a certified public accountant licensed in the state of Rhode Island indicating that the loan is capable of being repaid.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Every contract made in violation of any of the provisions of § 6-26-2, and every mortgage, pledge, deposit, or assignment made or given as security for the performance of the contract, shall be usurious and void.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      if the borrower shall, either before or after suit, make any payment on the contract, either of principal or interest, or of any part of either, and whether to the lender or to any assignee, endorsee, or transferee of the contract, the borrower shall be entitled to recover from the lender the amount so paid in an action of the case.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The provisions previously stated in this section shall not apply to any financial institution and its subsidiaries, credit union, or bank holding company and its subsidiaries, organized under the laws of the state; any other entity regulated by the department of business regulation; a national bank and its subsidiaries; federal savings and loan association or federal credit union; or a bank, company, or association collectively and individually referred to as a regulated financial institution.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      In the event a regulated financial institution knowingly contracts or charges a usurious rate of interest in violation of any of the provisions of § 6-26-2, it shall forfeit the entire interest on the debt.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      In case the usurious rate of interest has been paid, the person by whom it has been paid, or his or her legal representative, may recover from the regulated financial institution in an action in the nature of an action on the debt, twice the amount of the interest so paid, provided that the action is commenced within two (2) years from the time the usurious transaction occurred.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-3enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any person, who, on his or her own behalf or on behalf of any other person, partnership, corporation, or association, shall willfully and knowingly violate any of the provisions of § 6-26-2 shall be guilty of criminal usury and shall be imprisoned for not more than five (5) years.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Sections 6-26-2 — 6-26-4 shall not apply to loans made by duly licensed pawnbrokers on the security of a deposit of personal property.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Post judgment interest on any judgment, and interest in all business transactions where interest is secured or paid, shall be computed at the rate of twelve dollars ($12.00) on one hundred dollars ($100) for one year, unless a different rate is expressly stipulated.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-11enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Interest on medical debt shall be limited to the rate of interest equal to the weekly average one-year constant maturity Treasury yield, but not less than one and a half percent per annum (1.5% p.a.) nor more than four percent per annum (4% p.a.) as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the calendar week preceding the date when the consumer was first provided with a bill.
    • case84 A.3d 800NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital, LLCR.I.decided 2014read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      In a case of first impression, we are asked to determine whether a usury savings clause in a commercial loan document validates an otherwise usurious contract. In view of the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that it does not; we hold, therefore, that the promissory note at issue is void as a matter of law.
    • case84 A.3d 800NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital, LLCR.I.decided 2014read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      it is clear that the Legislature intended an inflexible, hardline approach to usury that is tantamount to strict liability.
    • case84 A.3d 800NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital, LLCR.I.decided 2014read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Usurious interest rates are to be avoided at all costs and the onus is on the lender to ensure compliance with the maximum rate of interest.
    • case84 A.3d 800NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital, LLCR.I.decided 2014read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      We therefore hold that, in loan contracts such as the instant loan, usury savings clauses are unenforceable as against the well-established public policy of preventing usurious transactions.
    • case84 A.3d 800NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital, LLCR.I.decided 2014read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      It bears mentioning that, because the two parties are commercial entities, the loan exceeded $1,000,000, and was not secured by either of the Cambios’ primary residences, the loan at issue surely qualified for the exception. By not securing the requisite pro forma analysis, PRC failed to avail itself of the exception and is therefore bound by the maximum interest rate.
    • case84 A.3d 800NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital, LLCR.I.decided 2014read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      In our view, the enforcement of usury savings clauses would entirely obviate any responsibility on the part of the lender to abide by the usury statute, and would, in essence, swallow the rule.
    • caseNo. 2020-33-Appeal.Commerce Park Realty, LLC v. HR2-A Corp.R.I.decided 2021
      Show the words that state the rule
      That grant of partial summary judgment declared that a series of loans made by the RFP defendants carrying interest rates ranging from 26 percent to 36 percent per annum were usurious and null and void.
    • caseNo. 2020-33-Appeal.Commerce Park Realty, LLC v. HR2-A Corp.R.I.decided 2021
      Show the words that state the rule
      In other words, Cambio plaintiffs submit that, under § 6-26-4(c), so long as one named borrower makes a payment on a usurious loan, all named borrowers may share in the disgorgement payments. We reject this contention.
    • case440 A.2d 727DeFusco v. GiorgioR.I.decided 1982read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      In our opinion, however, waiver of a usury defense should be permitted when it is freely and knowingly made after reasoned reflection for the legitimate purpose of avoiding or settling litigation.
    • case440 A.2d 727DeFusco v. GiorgioR.I.decided 1982read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      We emphasize that the case at bar does not present a situation in which a borrower has executed a release of all claims or defenses of usury either contemporaneous with the signing of a promissory note or in exchange for additional advances of funds.
    • case440 A.2d 727DeFusco v. GiorgioR.I.decided 1982read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any contract in which the yearly interest rate exceeds the maximum permissible rate set by the Legislature is expressly declared void by § 6-26-4. This statute not only affords borrowers relief from the obligations of usurious agreements but also entitles them to recover any payments made of either principal or interest.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Subject to the provisions of title 19, no person, partnership, association, or corporation loaning money to or negotiating the loan of money for another, except duly licensed pawnbrokers, shall, directly or indirectly, reserve, charge, or take interest on a loan, whether before or after maturity, at a rate that shall exceed the greater of twenty-one percent (21%) per annum or the alternate rate specified in subsection (b) of this section of the unpaid principal balance of the net proceeds of the loan not compounded, nor taken in advance, nor added on to the amount of the loan.
    • statuteR.I. Gen. Laws § 6-26-2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any of the preceding charges, if paid or advanced by the lender, may be considered part of the net proceeds of the loan, and if paid by the debtor, shall not be deducted from the net proceeds of the loan.
    • case84 A.3d 800NV One, LLC v. Potomac Realty Capital, LLCR.I.decided 2014read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Based on our de novo review, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to PRC, it is clear to this Court that the loan was a usury in violation of § 6-26-2.
    • case440 A.2d 727DeFusco v. GiorgioR.I.decided 1982read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The defendants’ appeal is denied and dismissed, the order denying the motion to vacate judgment is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court.
  23. no reading recorded at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Does South Dakota cap the interest rate this contract can charge?

    Not if the rate is set by a written agreement: South Dakota abolished its general usury cap for written agreements outright. SDCL 54-3-1.1: "Unless a maximum interest rate or charge is specifically established elsewhere in the code, there is no maximum interest rate or charge, or usury rate restriction between or among persons, corporations, limited liability companies, estates, fiduciaries, associations, or any other entities if they establish the interest rate or charge by written agreement. A written agreement is a document in writing, whether in physical or electronic form, in which the parties have demonstrated their agreement to the terms and conditions of an extension of credit, including the rate of interest." Only where the parties have NOT fixed a rate in writing do South Dakota's default statutory rates apply: SDCL 54-3-4 caps interest on an obligation to pay interest with no rate specified, “at a maximum rate of the Category C rate of interest as established in § 54-3-16”, which § 54-3-16(3) fixes at “twelve percent per year”, and SDCL 54-3-5 sets the default rate on money overdue on a written instrument, absent an express contract fixing a different rate, at the Category F rate, which § 54-3-16(6) fixes at “fifteen percent per year”, while § 54-3-5 adds that “[a]ny interest rate appearing on a bill, statement, or invoice may not exceed eighteen percent.”

    The trap

    Section 54-3-1.1's no-cap rule is conditioned entirely on there being a WRITTEN agreement fixing the rate: an oral agreement to pay interest, or silence on rate altogether, falls back to SDCL 54-3-2's presumption that a loan of money is made upon interest "unless it is otherwise expressly stipulated at the time in writing," and then to SDCL 54-3-4's or 54-3-5's capped default rates, not to an uncapped rate. The no-cap rule is also expressly subordinate to any OTHER rate cap "specifically established elsewhere in the code": a drafter should confirm no more specific statute (for a particular kind of lender or loan) sets a different ceiling before relying on § 54-3-1.1's general no-cap rule. Nothing read for this rule addresses federal preemption of any residual state usury restriction, and no South Dakota appellate opinion construing § 54-3-1.1's written-agreement no-cap rule was located in the research for this rule: an honest gap, not a resolved one.

    as of 2026-09-21

    6 authorities

    • statuteSDCL § 54-3-1.1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Unless a maximum interest rate or charge is specifically established elsewhere in the code, there is no maximum interest rate or charge, or usury rate restriction between or among persons, corporations, limited liability companies, estates, fiduciaries, associations, or any other entities if they establish the interest rate or charge by written agreement. A written agreement is a document in writing, whether in physical or electronic form, in which the parties have demonstrated their agreement to the terms and conditions of an extension of credit, including the rate of interest. A written agreement includes the contract created by § 54-11-9 .
    • statuteSDCL § 54-3-2enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Whenever a loan of money is made it is presumed to be made upon interest, unless it is otherwise expressly stipulated at the time in writing.
    • statuteSDCL § 54-3-5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any interest rate appearing on a bill, statement, or invoice may not exceed eighteen percent.
    • statuteSDCL § 54-3-5enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Unless there is an express contract in writing fixing a different rate or the interest rate clearly appears on the bill, statement, or invoice, interest is payable on all moneys at the Category F rate of interest as established in § 54-3-16 after they become due on any instrument of writing, and on moneys lent, or due on any settlement of accounts, from the day on which the balance is ascertained, and on moneys received to the use of another and detained from that other.
    • statuteSDCL § 54-3-4enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Under an obligation to pay interest, no rate being specified, interest is payable from date of incurrence of debt, unless the parties have otherwise agreed, at a maximum rate of the Category C rate of interest as established in § 54-3-16 , and in the like proportion for a longer or shorter term.
    • statuteSDCL § 54-3-16enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (3) Category C rate of interest is twelve percent per year; (4) Category D rate of interest is one percent per month or fraction thereof; (5) Category E rate of interest is four percent per year; (6) Category F rate of interest is fifteen percent per year;
  24. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What is the exposure if this agreement's interest rate turns out to be over the limit?

    It differs by transaction type, and liability attaches on CONTRACTING for the interest, not only on receiving it. A creditor who contracts for, charges, or receives interest greater than the amount authorized by the subtitle in connection with a transaction for personal, family or household use is liable to the obligor for the GREATER of (1) three times the amount by which the interest contracted for, charged or received exceeds the amount allowed by law, or (2) $2,000 or 20 percent of the principal, whichever is LESS. For a commercial transaction, the creditor is liable for three times the excess interest, and the verb set is narrower there: (a-1) reaches a creditor who contracts for or receives, but not one who merely charges. The chapter's penalties are the only penalties for an excessive rate (common-law penalties do not apply (§ 305.007)), and a consumer-transaction rate above twice the authorized amount is also a misdemeanor, each contract a separate offense (§ 305.008). Two more tiers sit beside that: a creditor who charges AND receives more than TWICE the authorized rate on a consumer transaction also forfeits the principal and all interest and other amounts charged and received (§ 305.002); and a creditor who charges more than the contract rate but not more than the legal maximum is not subject to usury penalties at all (§ 305.001(c)).

    The trap

    The consumer formula is a greater-of wrapped around a lesser-of and is routinely misread in both directions. The more important drafting point is the verb: the statute reaches a creditor who CONTRACTS FOR usurious interest, so exposure can exist on the face of the document before a dollar is collected, which is the usual reason parties add a usury savings clause (a drafting convention, not something § 305.001 provides for). But the chapter carries several safety valves. One is substantive: a creditor is not subject to penalty for usurious interest that results from an accidental and bona fide error (§ 305.101); correction by any one of several creditors in a single transaction protects them all (§ 305.104); and interest received under a final, unappealable judgment is not a violation (§ 305.105). The rest are procedural: an obligor who files suit must give the creditor written notice stating the violation not later than the 61st day before filing; a defendant raising usury as a counterclaim instead gives it at the time of filing, and on the creditor's application the action abates 60 days during which the creditor may correct, but only by also offering to pay the obligor's reasonable attorney's fees for work done before the abatement (§ 305.006(d)). 'Actually discovered' means discovery in fact, not what a prudent person should have discovered, and notice is given when delivered personally, by telecopier or by mail to the address in the most recent transaction documents (§ 305.103(b)-(c)), and a creditor who corrects the violation as § 305.103 provides within 60 days of that notice is not liable for it (§ 305.006(b)-(c)); independently, a creditor who corrects within 60 days of ACTUALLY discovering a violation, and notifies the obligor first, is not liable (§ 305.103(a)). So the first question after spotting usurious paper is whether the cure window is still open, not what the treble is. Two more terms sit in the same sections: an action 'must be brought within four years after the date on which the usurious interest was contracted for, charged, or received', and § 305.006(a) also fixes venue to one of five listed counties; and a creditor liable under § 305.001 or § 305.003 'is also liable to the obligor for reasonable attorney's fees set by the court' (§ 305.005). The maximum authorized rates themselves live in other chapters of the subtitle, which were not read here, so this rule tells you the consequence, not the ceiling.

    as of 2026-09-14

    10 authorities

    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.001enacted 2005-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) A creditor who contracts for, charges, or receives interest that is greater than the amount authorized by this subtitle in connection with a transaction for personal, family, or household use is liable to the obligor for an amount that is equal to the greater of: (1) three times the amount computed by subtracting the amount of interest allowed by law from the total amount of interest contracted for, charged, or received; or (2) $2,000 or 20 percent of the amount of the principal, whichever is less. (a-1) A creditor who contracts for or receives interest that is greater than the amount authorized by this subtitle in connection with a commercial transaction is liable to the obligor for an amount that is equal to three times the amount computed by subtracting the amount of interest allowed by law from the total amount of interest contracted for or received. (b) This section applies only to a contract or transaction subject to this subtitle. (c) A creditor who charges or receives interest in excess of the amount contracted for, but not in excess of the maximum amount authorized by law, is not subject to penalties for usurious interest but may be liable for other remedies and relief as provided by law.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.002enacted 2005-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) In addition to the amount determined under Section 305.001 , a creditor who charges and receives interest that is greater than twice the amount authorized by this subtitle is liable to the obligor for: (1) the principal amount on which the interest is charged and received; and (2) the interest and all other amounts charged and received. (b) This section applies only to a contract or transaction for personal, family, or household use subject to this subtitle.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.006enacted 2005-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) An action under this chapter must be brought within four years after the date on which the usurious interest was contracted for, charged, or received. The action must be brought in the county in which: (1) the transaction was entered into; (2) the usurious interest was charged or received; (3) the creditor resides at the time of the cause of action, if the creditor is an individual; (4) the creditor maintains its principal office, if the creditor is not an individual; or (5) the obligor resides at the time of the accrual of the cause of action. (b) Not later than the 61st day before the date an obligor files a suit seeking penalties for a transaction in which a creditor has contracted for, charged, or received usurious interest, the obligor shall give the creditor written notice stating in reasonable detail the nature and amount of the violation. (c) A creditor who receives a notice under this section may correct the violation as provided by Section 305.103 during the period beginning on the date the notice is received and ending on the 60th day after that date. A creditor who corrects a violation as provided by this section is not liable to an obligor for the violation. (d) With respect to a defendant filing a counterclaim action alleging usurious interest in an original action by the creditor, the defendant shall provide notice complying with Subsection (b) at the time of filing the counterclaim and, on application of the creditor to the court, the action is subject to abatement for a period of 60 days from the date of the court order. During the abatement period the creditor may correct a violation. As part of the correction of the violation, the creditor shall offer to pay the obligor's reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court based on the hours reasonably expended by the obligor's counsel with regard to the alleged violation before the abatement. A creditor who corrects a violation as provided by this subsection is not liable to an obligor for the violation.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.103enacted 1999-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) A creditor is not liable to an obligor for a violation of this subtitle if: (1) not later than the 60th day after the date the creditor actually discovered the violation, the creditor corrects the violation as to that obligor by taking any necessary action and making any necessary adjustment, including the payment of interest on a refund, if any, at the applicable rate provided for in the contract of the parties; and (2) the creditor gives written notice to the obligor of the violation before the obligor gives written notice of the violation or files an action alleging the violation. (b) For the purposes of Subsection (a), a violation is actually discovered at the time of the discovery of the violation in fact and not at the time when an ordinarily prudent person, through reasonable diligence, could or should have discovered or known of the violation. Actual discovery of a violation in one transaction may constitute actual discovery of the same violation in other transactions if the violation is of such a nature that it would necessarily be repeated and would be clearly apparent in the other transactions without the necessity of examining all the other transactions. (c) For purposes of Subsection (a), written notice is given when the notice is delivered to the person or to the person's authorized agent or attorney of record personally, by telecopier, or by United States mail to the address shown on the most recent documents in the transaction. Deposit of the notice as registered or certified mail in a postage paid, properly addressed wrapper in a post office or official depository under the care and custody of the United States Postal Service is prima facie evidence of the delivery of the notice to the person to whom the notice is addressed.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.005enacted 1999-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      A creditor who is liable under Section 305.001 or 305.003 is also liable to the obligor for reasonable attorney's fees set by the court.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.101enacted 1999-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      A creditor is not subject to penalty under this chapter for any usurious interest that results from an accidental and bona fide error.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.104enacted 1999-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      If in a single transaction more than one creditor may be liable for a violation of this subtitle, compliance with Section 305.103 by any of those creditors entitles each to the same protection provided by that section.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.105enacted 1999-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      A creditor is not liable to an obligor for a violation of this subtitle if the creditor receives interest that has been awarded pursuant to a final judgment that is no longer subject to modification or reversal.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.007enacted 1999-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      The penalties provided by this chapter are the only penalties for violation of this subtitle for contracting for, charging, or receiving interest in an amount that produces a rate in excess of the maximum rate allowed by law. Common law penalties do not apply.
    • statuteTex. Fin. Code § 305.008enacted 1999-09-01
      Show the words that state the rule
      (a) A person commits an offense if the person contracts for, charges, or receives interest on a transaction for personal, family, or household use that is greater than twice the amount authorized by this subtitle. (b) An offense under this section is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000. (c) Each contract or transaction that violates this section is a separate offense. (d) This section applies only to a contract or transaction subject to this subtitle.
  25. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is there a usury cap on a Utah loan?

    Not a general one in the text we hold: the parties to a lawful written, verbal or implied contract may agree upon any rate of interest, including for a loan or forbearance of money, goods or services, and absent an expressly specified rate the legal rate is 10% per annum. That section does not affect a penalty or interest charge that applies by law to delinquent or other taxes, or any contract or obligation made before May 14, 1981 (§ 15-1-1). Criminal usury is committed by an actor who knowingly engages in, or finances, the business of making loans at a higher rate of interest or consideration than is authorized by law, a third degree felony (§ 76-6-520).

    The trap

    'Any rate' is not unlimited in every setting: the criminal usury section is keyed to rates 'authorized by law', so a lender subject to a specific rate statute elsewhere in the Code can still commit it; those rate statutes were not researched here. A contract silent on interest carries 10%, not zero. Criminal usury also carries a forfeiture track: § 76-6-520 provides that forfeiture of property under the section, including seizure and disposition and any related judicial or administrative proceeding, runs under the seizure-of-property and contraband titles, and it imposes no criminal or civil liability on a law enforcement officer acting within the scope of a criminal investigation.

    as of 2026-09-17

    4 authorities

    • statuteUtah Code § 15-1-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The parties to a lawful written, verbal, or implied contract may agree upon any rate of interest for the contract, including a contract for services, a loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or services, or a claim for breach of contract. Unless the parties to a lawful written, verbal, or implied contract expressly specify a different rate of interest, the legal rate of interest for the contract, including a contract for services, a loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or services, or a claim for breach of contract is 10% per annum.
    • statuteUtah Code § 76-6-520enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      An actor commits criminal usury if the actor knowingly engages in, or directly or indirectly provides financing for, the business of making loans at a higher rate of interest or consideration therefor than is authorized by law. A violation of Subsection (2) is a third degree felony.
    • statuteUtah Code § 15-1-1enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Nothing in this section may be construed in any way to affect any penalty or interest charge that by law applies to delinquent or other taxes or to any contract or obligations made before May 14, 1981.
    • statuteUtah Code § 76-6-520enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This section may not be construed to impose criminal or civil liability on any law enforcement officer acting within the scope of a criminal investigation. The forfeiture of property under this section, including any seizure and disposition of the property and any related judicial or administrative proceeding, shall be conducted in accordance with Title 77, Chapter 11a, Seizure of Property and Contraband , through Chapter 11c, Retention of Evidence .
  26. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    Is the interest rate in this Virginia loan lawful, and what happens if it is not?

    Twelve percent is the ceiling unless another statute permits more, and exceeding it is drastic: "Except as otherwise permitted by law, no contract shall be made for the payment of interest on a loan at a rate that exceeds 12 percent per year" (Va. Code § 6.2-303(A)), and "Any contract made in violation of this section is void and no person shall have the right to collect, receive, or retain any principal, interest, fees, or other charges in connection with the contract" (§ 6.2-303(F)). The older remedy section says something different and milder: "Any borrower may plead in general terms that the contract on which the action is brought was for the payment of interest greater than is allowed by statute. If the court determines that the contract is usurious, judgment shall be rendered only for the principal sum" (§ 6.2-304). Prospective waiver is barred: "Any agreement or contract in which the borrower waives the benefits of this chapter or releases any rights he may have acquired under this chapter shall be deemed to be against public policy and void", but a post-loan settlement release is not: "The provisions of subsection A shall not apply to a waiver of benefits or release of rights made subsequent to a loan as part of a settlement of potential or pending claims by a borrower involving such loan" (§ 6.2-306). Two exemptions carry most commercial lending out of the chapter altogether. No corporation, qualifying partnership, limited liability company, business trust, or "joint venture organized for the purpose of holding, developing, and managing real estate for profit" may "by way of defense or otherwise, avail itself of any of the provisions of this chapter or any other statutory or case law relating to usury or compounding of interest to avoid or defeat the payment of any interest or any other sum that it has contracted to pay" (§ 6.2-308(A)); and no person may do so "in connection with a loan made to a person for business or investment purposes, if the initial amount of the loan is $5,000 or more" (§ 6.2-317(B)) and the party invoking an exemption carries the burden of bringing the transaction within it. Proof: "Usury, when pleaded, must be shown by clear and cogent proof, but the introduction in evidence of a contract expressly providing for a greater rate of interest than the law allows will establish a prima facie case", and "In determining whether a transaction is usurious, the court has both the right and the duty to probe behind the written instruments and to examine all facts and circumstances which shed light on the true nature of the transaction" (Radford). The borrower's affirmative remedy is in § 6.2-305: one who has paid interest above the permitted rate may sue within two years of the earlier of the last scheduled payment or payment in full for the excess, "Twice the total amount of interest paid to such person during the two years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the action", and court costs and reasonable attorney fees, but a creditor who proves a bona fide error in computation returns only the excess.

    The trap

    Two Virginia-specific things to hold in mind. First, §§ 6.2-303(F) and 6.2-304 give different consequences for the same wrong, and no published Virginia appellate decision reconciles them: subsection F (the section's amendment credits list 2020 amendments but do not show which one added it) voids the contract and bars recovery of PRINCIPAL as well as interest, while § 6.2-304, unchanged since the 2010 recodification, says judgment "shall be rendered only for the principal sum". Which one a court applies to a given loan is not answered by any published authority we could verify: the only treatment we hold is unpublished (see notes). Second, the exemptions are drawn by BORROWER and by PURPOSE, not by rate: a corporate borrower cannot plead usury at all, and for the $5,000 business-purpose exemption "A loan shall be deemed to be for business or investment purposes if it is not for personal, family, or household purposes", with those purposes expressly not including "a passive or active investment". Section 6.2-303(C) then closes the loop: "In the case of any loan upon which a person is not permitted to plead usury, interest and other charges may be imposed and collected as agreed by the parties." And a choice-of-law clause can take the loan out of Virginia usury law entirely: that is what happened in Settlement Funding v. Von Neumann-Lillie, where the Supreme Court of Virginia held the circuit court erred in refusing to apply Utah law, counsel's statement plus a post-hearing memorandum citing Utah Code § 70C-7-106 "provided the circuit court with sufficient information", and reversed in part the usury judgment, damages, costs and fees, and remanded. The chapter also says what enforcing a loan as agreed does NOT settle: “Any provision of this chapter that provides that a loan or extension of credit may be enforced as agreed in the contract of indebtedness, shall not be construed to preclude the charging or collecting of other loan fees and charges permitted by law, in addition to the stated interest rate.” So the rate ceiling is not the whole price question; fees and charges permitted elsewhere ride on top of the stated rate and are not measured against it by this sentence. Three more things the section itself says. The 12 percent cap's own exception clause has content: § 6.2-303(B) lists, "without limitation", the laws that permit more (Article 4 of the chapter, consumer finance companies, short-term loans, motor vehicle title lenders, the Housing Development Authority, insurance agents, premium finance companies, pawnbrokers, third-party tax payment agreements), so most regulated lending never meets the cap at all. Subsection (E) reaches "any person who seeks to evade its application by any device, subterfuge, or pretense whatsoever", including disguised sales of goods or services and loans routed through a third person, which is the statutory basis for Radford's duty to probe behind the instruments. And since July 1, 2024, subsection (G) treats a cash advance against an expected inheritance as a loan, with everything paid above the advance as interest.

    as of 2026-09-20

    23 authorities

    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-303enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as otherwise permitted by law, no contract shall be made for the payment of interest on a loan at a rate that exceeds 12 percent per year.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-303enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any contract made in violation of this section is void and no person shall have the right to collect, receive, or retain any principal, interest, fees, or other charges in connection with the contract.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-304enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any borrower may plead in general terms that the contract on which the action is brought was for the payment of interest greater than is allowed by statute. If the court determines that the contract is usurious, judgment shall be rendered only for the principal sum.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-306enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any agreement or contract in which the borrower waives the benefits of this chapter or releases any rights he may have acquired under this chapter shall be deemed to be against public policy and void.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-306enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      The provisions of subsection A shall not apply to a waiver of benefits or release of rights made subsequent to a loan as part of a settlement of potential or pending claims by a borrower involving such loan.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-308enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      No (i) corporation, (ii) partnership that is required to file a certificate pursuant to Chapter 2.1 (§ 50-73.1 et seq.) of Title 50 or was required to file a certificate pursuant to former Chapter 2 (§ 50-44 et seq.) or Chapter 3 (§ 50-74 et seq.) of Title 50 or that is formed under laws other than those of the Commonwealth, (iii) limited liability company, (iv) business trust, or (v) joint venture organized for the purpose of holding, developing, and managing real estate for profit, shall, by way of defense or otherwise, avail itself of any of the provisions of this chapter or any other statutory or case law relating to usury or compounding of interest to avoid or defeat the payment of any interest or any other sum that it has contracted to pay.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-317enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A. For purposes of this section: 1. A loan shall be deemed to be for business or investment purposes if it is not for personal, family, or household purposes; and 2. Personal, family, or household purposes do not include a passive or active investment. B. No person shall, by way of defense or otherwise, avail himself of the provisions of this chapter, or any other statutory or case law relating to usury or compounding of interest, to avoid or defeat the payment of interest, or any other sum, in connection with a loan made to a person for business or investment purposes, if the initial amount of the loan is $5,000 or more.
    • case226 Va. 596Radford v. Community Mortgage & Investment Corp.Va.decided 1984read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Usury, when pleaded, must be shown by clear and cogent proof, but the introduction in evidence of a contract expressly providing for a greater rate of interest than the law allows will establish a prima facie case. See Chakales v. Djiovanides, 161 Va. 48 , 170 S.E. 848 (1933). Thereupon, the burden shifts to the opposing party to go forward with evidence which would bring the transaction within an exception to the usury laws, or to show some other valid reason to avoid their application.
    • case226 Va. 596Radford v. Community Mortgage & Investment Corp.Va.decided 1984read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      In determining whether a transaction is usurious, the court has both the right and the duty to probe behind the written instruments and to examine all facts and circumstances which shed light on the true nature of the transaction.
    • case274 Va. 76Settlement Funding, LLC v. Von Neumann-LillieVa.decided 2007read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      If a contract specifies that the substantive law of another jurisdiction governs its interpretation or application, the parties' choice of substantive law should be applied.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-303enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any provision of this chapter that provides that a loan or extension of credit may be enforced as agreed in the contract of indebtedness, shall not be construed to preclude the charging or collecting of other loan fees and charges permitted by law, in addition to the stated interest rate. Such other loan fees and charges need not be included in the rate of interest stated in the contract of indebtedness.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-305enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A. If interest in excess of that permitted by an applicable statute is paid upon any loan, the person paying may bring an action within two years from the first to occur of: (i) the date of the last scheduled loan payment or (ii) the date of payment of the loan in full, to recover from the person taking or receiving such payments: 1. The total amount of the interest paid to such person in excess of that permitted by the applicable statute; 2. Twice the total amount of interest paid to such person during the two years immediately preceding the date of the filing of the action; and 3. Court costs and reasonable attorney fees.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-305enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      C. Any creditor who proves that interest or other charges in excess of those permitted by law were imposed or collected as a result of a bona fide error in computation or similar mistake shall not be liable for the penalties prescribed in this section. In such event, the creditor shall only be liable to return to the borrower the amount of interest or other charges collected in excess of the amount permitted by applicable statute.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-303enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      B. Laws that permit payment of interest at a rate that exceeds 12 percent per year are set out, without limitation, in: 1. Article 4 (§ 6.2-309 et seq.) of this chapter; 2. Chapter 15 (§ 6.2-1500 et seq.), relating to powers of consumer finance companies; 3. Chapter 18 (§ 6.2-1800 et seq.), relating to short-term loans; 4. Chapter 22 (§ 6.2-2200 et seq.), relating to interest chargeable by motor vehicle title lenders; 5. Section 36-55.31 , relating to loans by the Virginia Housing Development Authority; 6. Section 38.2-1806 , relating to interest chargeable by insurance agents; 7. Chapter 47 (§ 38.2-4700 et seq.) of Title 38.2, relating to interest chargeable by premium finance companies; 8. Section 54.1-4008 , relating to interest chargeable by pawnbrokers; and 9. Section 58.1-3018 , relating to interest and origination fees payable under third-party tax payment agreements.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-303enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      E. The provisions of subsection A shall apply to any person who seeks to evade its application by any device, subterfuge, or pretense whatsoever, including: 1. The loan, forbearance, use, or sale of (i) credit, as guarantor, surety, endorser, comaker, or otherwise; (ii) money; (iii) goods; or (iv) things in action; 2. The use of collateral or related sales or purchases of goods or services, or agreements to sell or purchase, whether real or pretended; receiving or charging compensation for goods or services, whether or not sold, delivered, or provided; and 3. The real or pretended negotiation, arrangement, or procurement of a loan through any use or activity of a third person, whether real or fictitious.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-303enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      G. Any contract entered into on or after July 1, 2024, pursuant to which a person receives a cash advance for assigning to a company or other entity a portion of such person's rights to receive inheritance funds from a will that has been, or is anticipated to be, offered for probate in a circuit court of the Commonwealth shall be considered a loan. Any funds such person is obligated to pay under the terms of such contract in addition to the total of the cash advance shall be considered interest. Such contract shall be subject to the provisions of subsection A.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-303enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      C. In the case of any loan upon which a person is not permitted to plead usury, interest and other charges may be imposed and collected as agreed by the parties.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-308enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      B. Nothing contained in this chapter or any other statutory or case law relating to usury or compounding of interest shall be construed to prevent the recovery of interest or any other sum that an entity described in subsection A has contracted to pay, regardless of whether it is more than the contract rate of interest and the fact appears on the face of the contract.
    • statuteVa. Code § 6.2-305enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      B. If the sale of property in which an interest has been conveyed to secure the payment of the debt is scheduled or anticipated, an injunction may be granted to prevent such sale pending the completion of an action brought pursuant to subsection A.
    • case226 Va. 596Radford v. Community Mortgage & Investment Corp.Va.decided 1984read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Since the usury laws must be liberally construed, it follows that exemptions therefrom must be strictly construed, in order to “advance the remedy and suppress the mischief.”
    • case226 Va. 596Radford v. Community Mortgage & Investment Corp.Va.decided 1984read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      The lender thus failed to overcome the Radfords’ prima facie showing of usury.
    • case274 Va. 76Settlement Funding, LLC v. Von Neumann-LillieVa.decided 2007read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      These citations to Utah law provided the circuit court with sufficient information regarding the substance of Utah law. See also Code § 8.01-386. Therefore, the circuit court erred in refusing to apply Utah law in the construction of the loan agreement.
    • case274 Va. 76Settlement Funding, LLC v. Von Neumann-LillieVa.decided 2007read it at the source ↗
      Show the words that state the rule
      Accordingly, we will reverse those portions of the judgments of the circuit court entering judgment in favor of Lillie based on her claim of usury under Code § 6.1-330.57 and awarding her damages, costs and attorneys' fees under that statute and remand the case for further proceedings. Reversed in part, and remanded.
  27. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What interest rate can a Washington contract charge, and who can raise usury?

    Any rate is legal so long as it does not exceed the higher of twelve percent per annum or four percentage points above the average bill rate for twenty-six week treasury bills at the first auction of the calendar month before the rate is set by written agreement (or adjusted under a written agreement permitting adjustment); the same subsection then states the prohibition the ceiling implies: "No person shall directly or indirectly take or receive in money, goods, or things in action, or in any other way, any greater interest for the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action" (RCW 19.52.020(1)). On a loan of five hundred dollars or less a setup charge is not interest, capped at four percent of the funds advanced or fifteen dollars, whichever is less, with "a minimum not exceeding four dollars" chargeable on loans of under one hundred dollars (RCW 19.52.020(2)). A contract for a greater rate is usurious but not void: the creditor is entitled only to principal less the interest accruing at the contract rate; if interest has been paid, principal less twice the interest paid and less accrued unpaid interest; and the debtor recovers costs and reasonable attorneys' fees plus the amount paid over what the creditor is entitled to, with "[t]he reduction in principal ... applied to diminish pro rata each future installment of principal payable under the terms of the contract" (RCW 19.52.030(1)). Entering into or transacting a usurious contract is also declared "an unfair act or practice in the conduct of commerce for the purpose of the application of the consumer protection act found in chapter 19.86 RCW": a per se unfair act under the Consumer Protection Act (RCW 19.52.036). A lender cannot put the problem on its broker: "[t]he acts and dealings of an agent in loaning money shall bind the principal", a person acting for both sides "shall be deemed the agent of the lender", and an agent who transacts a usurious loan for a commission is liable to its principal for the fee and to the lender for the loss the chapter causes (RCW 19.52.030(2)). Corporations, trusts, associations, partnerships, joint ventures, governments and others may not plead usury, and no person may plead it if the transaction was primarily for agricultural, commercial, investment or business purposes, except a consumer transaction (personal, family or household purposes) of any amount (RCW 19.52.080). Where no rate is agreed in writing, the loan bears twelve percent by default, but the writing requirement is easily met, because an agreement in writing that "provides for the payment of money at the end of an agreed period of time or in installments over an agreed period of time" is itself "a writing for purposes of this section", and the discounting of commercial paper on which the borrower is maker, guarantor or indorser counts as a loan under the chapter (RCW 19.52.010(1)). Two safe harbours sit in § 19.52.020(3): a loan made under a commitment to lend at a rate lawful when the commitment was made is not usurious, and open-end credit is not usurious if on any one day in the billing cycle the rate charged was lawful. And prejudgment interest charged or collected on medical debt may not exceed nine percent, with the same cap written into RCW 19.52.010(2): for medical debt on which prejudgment interest had accrued or was accruing "as of July 28, 2019, no prejudgment interest in excess of nine percent shall accrue thereafter" (RCW 19.52.020(4)).

    The trap

    The business-purpose bar is what removes usury from most commercial contracts: even an individual borrower cannot plead it if the loan was primarily for business. And the ceiling itself may not be checkable on the day you need it: the alternative limb is four points over a treasury-bill yield "as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System", a figure that lives outside the code, so the twelve percent floor is the only number the law we hold can give you with certainty, though the resulting ceiling is published: each month the state treasurer must compute "the highest rate of interest permissible under RCW 19.52.020(1)" for the next calendar month and file it with the code reviser "for publication in the next available issue of the Washington State Register" (RCW 19.52.025). And a debtor may not sue under 19.52.030 on a loan to a corporation engaged in business for business purposes unless there is also personal liability of a natural person for more than principal plus lawful interest. The chapter also does not apply at all to a retail installment transaction as defined in RCW 63.14.010, "whether or not it is construed to be a loan or forbearance" (RCW 19.52.100), so the financed sale of goods is priced under chapter 63.14, not this one, and a consumer lease, a lease-purchase agreement, or a lease that would be a consumer lease but for the lessee being an entity, the purpose being commercial, or the obligation exceeding $25,000 is not a loan or forbearance for this chapter (RCW 19.52.010(3)). A deferred-payment sale sits outside the chapter entirely: "A sales contract for goods or services providing for the deferred payment of the purchase price shall not be subject to this chapter, regardless of who seeks to enforce the contract" (RCW 19.52.120), and the eight financing arrangements the section lists do not change that. Going out of state does not escape the chapter, though: where "a loan or forbearance is made outside Washington state to a person then residing in this state", the chapter applies "in all courts of this state to the same extent such usury laws would be applicable if the loan or forbearance was made in this state" (RCW 19.52.034).

    as of 2026-09-16

    9 authorities

    • statuteRCW 19.52.020enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (1) Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, any rate of interest shall be legal so long as the rate of interest does not exceed the higher of: (a) Twelve percent per annum; or (b) four percentage points above the equivalent coupon issue yield (as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) of the average bill rate for twenty-six week treasury bills as determined at the first bill market auction conducted during the calendar month immediately preceding the later of (i) the establishment of the interest rate by written agreement of the parties to the contract, or (ii) any adjustment in the interest rate in the case of a written agreement permitting an adjustment in the interest rate. No person shall directly or indirectly take or receive in money, goods, or things in action, or in any other way, any greater interest for the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action. (2)(a) In any loan of money in which the funds advanced do not exceed the sum of five hundred dollars, a setup charge may be charged and collected by the lender, and such setup charge shall not be considered interest hereunder. (b) The setup charge shall not exceed four percent of the amount of funds advanced, or fifteen dollars, whichever is the lesser, except that on loans of under one hundred dollars a minimum not exceeding four dollars may be so charged. (3) Any loan made pursuant to a commitment to lend at an interest rate permitted at the time the commitment is made shall not be usurious. Credit extended pursuant to an open-end credit agreement upon which interest is computed on the basis of a balance or balances outstanding during a billing cycle shall not be usurious if on any one day during the billing cycle the rate at which interest is charged for the billing cycle is not usurious. (4)(a) Prejudgment interest charged or collected on medical debt, as defined in RCW 19.16.100, must not exceed nine percent. (b) For any medical debt for which prejudgment interest has accrued or may be accruing as of July 28, 2019, no prejudgment interest in excess of nine percent shall accrue thereafter. [ 2019 c 227 s 6; 1989 c 14 s 3; 1985 c 224 s 1; 1981 c 78 s 1; 1967 ex.s. c 23 s 4; 1899 c 80 s 2; RRS s 7300. Prior: 1895 c 136 s 2; 1893 c 20 s 3; Code 1881 s 2369; 1863 p 433 s 2; 1854 p 380 s 2.]
    • statuteRCW 19.52.030enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (1) If a greater rate of interest than is allowed by statute shall be contracted for or received or reserved, the contract shall be usurious, but shall not, therefore, be void. If in any action on such contract proof be made that greater rate of interest has been directly or indirectly contracted for or taken or reserved, the creditor shall only be entitled to the principal, less the amount of interest accruing thereon at the rate contracted for; and if interest shall have been paid, the creditor shall only be entitled to the principal less twice the amount of the interest paid, and less the amount of all accrued and unpaid interest; and the debtor shall be entitled to costs and reasonable attorneys' fees plus the amount by which the amount the debtor has paid under the contract exceeds the amount to which the creditor is entitled: PROVIDED, That the debtor may not commence an action on the contract to apply the provisions of this section if a loan or forbearance is made to a corporation engaged in a trade or business for the purposes of carrying on said trade or business unless there is also, in connection with such loan or forbearance, the creation of liability on the part of a natural person or that person's property for an amount in excess of the principal plus interest allowed pursuant to RCW 19.52.020. The reduction in principal shall be applied to diminish pro rata each future installment of principal payable under the terms of the contract. (2) The acts and dealings of an agent in loaning money shall bind the principal, and in all cases where there is usurious interest contracted for by the transaction of any agent the principal shall be held thereby to the same extent as though the principal had acted in person. Where the same person acts as agent of the borrower and lender, that person shall be deemed the agent of the lender for the purposes of this chapter. If the agent of both the borrower and lender, or of the lender only, transacts a usurious loan for a commission or fee, such agent shall be liable to the principal for the amount of the commission or fee received or reserved by the agent, and liable to the lender for the loss suffered by the lender as a result of the application of this chapter. [ 1989 c 14 s 7; 1967 ex.s. c 23 s 5; 1899 c 80 s 7; RRS s 7304. Prior: 1895 c 136 s 5; 1893 c 20 s 3. Formerly RCW 19.52.030 through 19.52.050.]
    • statuteRCW 19.52.080enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Profit and nonprofit corporations, Massachusetts trusts, associations, trusts, general partnerships, joint ventures, limited partnerships, and governments and governmental subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities may not plead the defense of usury nor maintain any action thereon or therefor, and persons may not plead the defense of usury nor maintain any action thereon or therefor if the transaction was primarily for agricultural, commercial, investment, or business purposes: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That this section shall not apply to a consumer transaction of any amount. Consumer transactions, as used in this section, shall mean transactions primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. [ 1981 c 78 s 2; 1975 1st ex.s. c 180 s 1; 1970 ex.s. c 97 s 2; 1969 ex.s. c 142 s 1.]
    • statuteRCW 19.52.100enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This chapter shall not apply to a retail installment transaction, as defined by RCW 63.14.010, whether or not it is construed to be a loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action. [ 1981 c 78 s 3.]
    • statuteRCW 19.52.010enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, every loan or forbearance of money, goods, or thing in action shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent per annum where no different rate is agreed to in writing between the parties: PROVIDED, That with regard to any transaction heretofore or hereafter entered into subject to this section, if an agreement in writing between the parties evidencing such transaction provides for the payment of money at the end of an agreed period of time or in installments over an agreed period of time, then such agreement shall constitute a writing for purposes of this section and satisfy the requirements thereof. The discounting of commercial paper, where the borrower makes himself or herself liable as maker, guarantor, or indorser, shall be considered as a loan for the purposes of this chapter. (2)(a) Prejudgment interest charged or collected on medical debt, as defined in RCW 19.16.100, must not exceed nine percent. (b) For any medical debt for which prejudgment interest has accrued or may be accruing as of July 28, 2019, no prejudgment interest in excess of nine percent shall accrue thereafter. (3) A lease shall not be considered a loan or forbearance for the purposes of this chapter if: (a) It constitutes a "consumer lease" as defined in RCW 63.10.020; (b) It constitutes a lease-purchase agreement under chapter 63.19 RCW; or (c) It would constitute such "consumer lease" but for the fact that: (i) The lessee was not a natural person; (ii) The lease was not primarily for personal, family, or household purposes; or (iii) The total contractual obligation exceeded twenty-five thousand dollars. [ 2019 c 227 s 5; 2011 c 336 s 542; 1992 c 134 s 13. Prior: 1983 c 309 s 1; 1983 c 158 s 6; 1981 c 80 s 1; 1899 c 80 s 1; RRS s 7299; prior: 1895 c 136 s 1; 1893 c 20 s 1; Code 1881 s 2368; 1863 p 433 s 1; 1854 p 380 s 1.]
    • statuteRCW 19.52.036enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Entering into or transacting a usurious contract is hereby declared to be an unfair act or practice in the conduct of commerce for the purpose of the application of the consumer protection act found in chapter 19.86 RCW. [ 1967 ex.s. c 23 s 7.]
    • statuteRCW 19.52.034enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Whenever a loan or forbearance is made outside Washington state to a person then residing in this state the usury laws found in chapter 19.52 RCW, as now or hereafter amended, shall be applicable in all courts of this state to the same extent such usury laws would be applicable if the loan or forbearance was made in this state. [ 1967 ex.s. c 23 s 3.]
    • statuteRCW 19.52.120enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      A sales contract for goods or services providing for the deferred payment of the purchase price shall not be subject to this chapter, regardless of who seeks to enforce the contract, notwithstanding the existence or occurrence of any one or more of the following events: (1) That the seller may have arranged to sell, pledge, indorse, negotiate, assign, or transfer the obligations thereof to any person, including a financing organization, prior to or subsequent to or concurrently with the making of the sales transaction; (2) That the amount of the finance charge, however denominated, is determined by reference to charts, computations or information supplied by such person; (3) That the form or forms of instruments used to evidence the sales transaction have been supplied or prepared by such person; (4) That the credit standing of the purchaser is or may have been evaluated by such person; (5) That the sales transaction and the execution of any instrument evidencing the same is negotiated in the presence or with the assistance of a representative of such person; (6) That the instrument or instruments used to evidence the sales transaction are pledged, indorsed, negotiated, assigned, or transferred by the seller to such person; (7) That there is an underlying agreement between the seller and such person concerning the pledging, indorsing, negotiation, assigning, or transferring of sales contracts; or (8) That the financing organization or its affiliates also provide franchising, financing, or other services to the seller-assignor. [ 1981 c 77 s 7.]
    • statuteRCW 19.52.025enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Each month the state treasurer shall compute the highest rate of interest permissible under RCW 19.52.020(1), and the rate of interest required by RCW 4.56.110(3) and 4.56.115, for the succeeding calendar month. The treasurer shall file these rates with the state code reviser for publication in the next available issue of the Washington State Register in compliance with RCW 34.08.020(8). [ 2004 c 185 s 4; 1986 c 60 s 1.]
  28. read at the 2026-10-03 bar

    What interest rate can we charge on this loan in Wisconsin?

    Wis. Stat. § 138.05(1) provides that, except as authorized by other statutes, no person shall directly or indirectly contract for, take or receive, in money, goods or things in action or in any other way, any greater sum or greater value for the loan or forbearance of money, goods or things in action than the rate of $12 upon $100 for one year computed upon the declining principal balance, with alternative computations in paragraphs (b) and (c) for loans repayable in installments. The same subsection adds a drafting rule: in computing interest upon any bond, note, or other instrument or agreement, interest shall not be compounded, nor shall the interest bear interest, unless an agreement to that effect is clearly expressed in writing and signed by the party to be charged. Read no further and that is the wrong answer, because the section then withdraws itself from most lending. Subsection (5): “This section shall not apply to loans to corporations or limited liability companies.” Subsection (7): “This section does not apply to any loan or forbearance in the amount of $150,000 or more made after May 26, 1978 unless secured by an encumbrance on a one- to four-family dwelling which the borrower uses as his or her principal place of residence.” And subsection (8)(c): “This section does not apply to any loan or forbearance which is made on or after November 1, 1981, or to any refinancing, renewal, extension, modification or prepayment on or after November 1, 1981, of any loan or forbearance, except this section does apply to forbearances occurring primarily for personal, family or household purposes for which the only charge is a penalty or late charge for nonpayment when due.” On the section’s own words, then, a loan made today is outside § 138.05 altogether unless it is a forbearance primarily for personal, family or household purposes whose only charge is a late charge for nonpayment.

    The trap

    The $12 upon $100 figure is not a live cap on a loan you are writing now, and reading subsection (1) alone is how a drafter gets that wrong. Subsection (8)(c) takes the whole section off any loan or forbearance made on or after 1 November 1981, and off any refinancing, renewal, extension, modification or prepayment on or after that date, keeping only the consumer-forbearance late-charge case. Subsections (5) and (7) remove corporate and limited-liability-company borrowers and loans of $150,000 or more (after 26 May 1978) that are not secured by the borrower’s one- to four-family principal residence, and subsection (7) then says what counts as that amount, which is wider than it looks: a loan is deemed to be $150,000 or more not only where the outstanding principal initially exceeds $150,000 but also where the parties agreed the principal might exceed it at some time during the term and, when the agreement was made, it was reasonably expected to, even though less than $150,000 was ever advanced in the aggregate, and subsection (6) removes transactions governed by chs. 421 to 427 and 429 and discounts described in s. 422.201(8). Everything else § 138.05 appears to give a drafter travels with the section and is withdrawn with it: the compounding rule quoted above sits inside subsection (1), and the borrower’s right in § 138.05(2) to prepay a loan bearing more than $10 per $100 per year, with a refund of unearned interest, sits inside the same section, so neither reaches a post-1981 loan on these words. NOT ESTABLISHED HERE: what does set the enforceable rate on a Wisconsin loan made today. The opening words ‘except as authorized by other statutes’ point outside this section, and the statutes they point to (the Wisconsin Consumer Act in chs. 421 to 427, and the bank and licensed-lender provisions elsewhere in ch. 138) were not read for this rule.

    as of 2026-09-17

    10 authorities

    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Except as authorized by other statutes, no person shall, directly or indirectly, contract for, take or receive in money, goods or things in action, or in any other way, any greater sum or any greater value, for the loan or forbearance of money, goods or things in action, than: 138.05(1)(a) (a) At the rate of $12 upon $100 for one year computed upon the declining principal balance of the loan or forbearance;
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      In the computation of interest upon any bond, note, or other instrument or agreement, interest shall not be compounded, nor shall the interest thereon be construed to bear interest, unless an agreement to that effect is clearly expressed in writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewith.
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Any loan for which the rate of interest charged exceeds $10 per $100 for one year computed upon the declining principal balance may be prepaid by the borrower at any time in whole or in part.
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This section shall not apply to loans to corporations or limited liability companies.
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This section does not apply to any loan or forbearance in the amount of $150,000 or more made after May 26, 1978 unless secured by an encumbrance on a one- to four-family dwelling which the borrower uses as his or her principal place of residence.
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This section does not apply to any loan or forbearance which is made on or after November 1, 1981, or to any refinancing, renewal, extension, modification or prepayment on or after November 1, 1981, of any loan or forbearance, except this section does apply to forbearances occurring primarily for personal, family or household purposes for which the only charge is a penalty or late charge for nonpayment when due.
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      With respect to loans or forbearances repayable in substantially equal weekly or monthly installments and the face amounts of which include predetermined interest charges, at the rate of $6 upon $100 for one year computed upon that portion of the original principal amount of any such loan or forbearance, not including interest charges, for the time of such loan or forbearance, disregarding part payments and the dates thereof; and 138.05(1)(c) (c) With respect to loans or forbearances repayable in installments other than of the type described in par. (b) , the amount of interest may be predetermined at the rate set forth in par. (a) at the time the loan is made on the basis of the agreed rate of interest and the principal balances agreed to be outstanding and stated in the note or loan contract as an addition to the principal; provided that if any agreed balance of principal or principal and interest combined or any installment of principal or principal and interest combined is prepaid in full by cash or renewal the unearned interest shall be refunded as provided in sub. (2) (b) .
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      Upon prepayment of any such loan in full by cash, renewal or refinancing, the borrower shall be entitled to a refund of unearned interest charged which shall be determined as follows: 138.05(2)(a) (a) On any such loan which is repayable in substantially equal, successive installments at approximately equal intervals of time and the face amount of which includes predetermined interest charges, the amount of such refund shall be as great a proportion of the total interest charged as the sum of the balances scheduled to be outstanding during the full installment periods commencing with the installment date nearest the date of prepayment bears to the sum of the balances scheduled to be outstanding for all installment periods of the loan. 138.05(2)(b) (b) On any other such loan, the amount of such refund shall not be less than the difference between the interest charged and interest, at the rate contracted for, computed upon the unpaid principal balances of the loan from time to time outstanding prior to prepayment in full.
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      This section does not apply to transactions governed by chs. 421 to 427 and 429 or to discounts described in s. 422.201 (8) .
    • statuteWis. Stat. § 138.05enactment date not established
      Show the words that state the rule
      For the purposes of this section, a loan is deemed a loan which is in the amount of $150,000 or more if: 138.05(7)(a) (a) The outstanding principal indebtedness under the loan initially exceeds $150,000; or 138.05(7)(b) (b) The parties to the loan agree that the principal indebtedness may exceed $150,000 at some time during the term of the loan and, when the agreement was made, the principal indebtedness was reasonably expected to exceed $150,000 notwithstanding the fact that less than $150,000 in the aggregate was initially or later advanced.