Can we charge a monthly late-payment finance charge on this account under North Dakota law, and does our contract need to say so?
Yes, without a contractual finance-charge clause, but only within statutory limits and conditions. N.D.C.C. § 13-01-14(1)-(2): "A creditor may charge, receive, and collect a late payment charge on all money due on account from thirty days after the obligation of the debtor to pay has been incurred," and "[t]he late payment charge allowed under this section may not exceed one and three-fourths percent per month." Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc. explains when the statute, rather than the contract, does the work: "This Court has recognized N.D.C.C. §§ 13-01-14 and 13-01-15 apply to finance charges on accounts receivable when no contractual provision explicitly authorizes the finance charges."
The trap
The 1.75%-per-month cap is not the only condition: § 13-01-14(3) makes the charge unavailable at all "unless, when the obligation was incurred, the creditor did not intend to extend any credit beyond thirty days and any late payment of the obligation was unanticipated," a fact-specific, at-formation intent test that a creditor who knowingly extends longer-term credit cannot satisfy. Separately, § 13-01-15 bars the charge outright unless the creditor "promptly supplies the debtor with a statement as of the end of each monthly period ... in which there is any unpaid balance." And the statute carves out three categories entirely (retail installment contracts, revolving charge accounts, and medical-bill accounts receivable, each governed by its own separate chapter), so this section does not answer a late-fee question for those transaction types. Failing a condition does not merely cost the charge, it reshapes the award. Titan Machinery recounts Royal Jewelers, where without § 13-01-14 the creditor "would be limited to the presumed rate of interest of 6% per annum under N.D.C.C. § 47-14-05" and this Court "reversed and remanded the award of late payment charges for findings on the predicate facts for the applicability of N.D.C.C. § 13-01-14," and Titan Machinery did the same thing because the findings "did not address late payment charges or the predicate facts for the applicability of N.D.C.C. §§ 13-01-14 and 13-01-15 as a component of damages." The § 13-01-15 statement is a list and not a line: it must state the percentage charge, "[t]he unpaid balance at the end of the period," an identification of any amount debited during the period, the payments made by or for the debtor, and "[t]he amount of the late payment charge."
9 authorities
- statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-14enactment date not established
The words that state the rule
A creditor may charge, receive, and collect a late payment charge on all money due on account from thirty days after the obligation of the debtor to pay has been incurred. A creditor may assign an account receivable that is subject to this section. An assignee of an account receivable has the same right to charge a late payment charge as does an original creditor for the assigned account receivable.
- statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-14enactment date not established
The words that state the rule
The late payment charge allowed under this section may not exceed one and three-fourths percent per month.
- statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-14enactment date not established
The words that state the rule
The late payment charge allowed under this section may not be charged unless, when the obligation was incurred, the creditor did not intend to extend any credit beyond thirty days and any late payment of the obligation was unanticipated.
- case874 N.W.2d 317Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc.N.D.decided 2016read it at the source ↗
The words that state the rule
This Court has recognized N.D.C.C. §§ 13-01-14 and 13-01-15 apply to finance charges on accounts receivable when no contractual provision explicitly authorizes the finance charges. See Industrial Fiberglass v. Jandt, 361 N.W.2d 595, 600 (N.D.1985); Metric Constr., Inc. *323 v. Great Plains Properties, 344 N.W.2d 679, 682-83 (N.D.1984).
- statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-15enactment date not established
The words that state the rule
Such statement must state, in any order, the following: - The percentage amount of the late payment charge which will be charged beginning thirty days after the obligation is incurred for purposes of section 13-01-14, or beginning after the billed medical services become delinquent for purposes of section 13-01-14.1. - The unpaid balance at the end of the period. - An identification of any amount debited to the debtor's account during the period. - The payments made by or for the debtor to the creditor during the period. - The amount of the late payment charge. - Additional items may be included in the statement to explain the computations made in determining the amount to be paid by the debtor.
- statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-14enactment date not established
The words that state the rule
This section does not apply to: - Money due on retail installment contracts, as defined in chapter 51-13. - Money due on revolving charge accounts, as defined in chapter 51-14. - Money due a medical services provider on accounts receivable for medical bills.
- statuteN.D.C.C. § 13-01-15enactment date not established
The words that state the rule
A creditor may not charge the account receivable late payment charge provided for under section 13-01-14 or 13-01-14.1 unless the creditor promptly supplies the debtor with a statement as of the end of each monthly period, or other regular period agreed upon by the creditor and the debtor, in which there is any unpaid balance.
- case874 N.W.2d 317Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc.N.D.decided 2016read it at the source ↗
The words that state the rule
This Court said no evidence existed of a written contract authorizing finance charges, and “unless [N.D.C.C. § ] 13-01-14 applie[d], there [was] no legal or contractual basis for a 1.5% per month finance charge, and [the creditor] would be limited to the presumed rate of interest of 6% per annum under N.D.C.C. § 47-14-05.” Royal Jewelers, at 527. This Court concluded no findings existed about whether the creditor intended to extend credit to the debtor beyond thirty days or whether late payment was anticipated under N.D.C.C. § 13-01-14. Royal Jewelers, at 527. This Court reversed and remanded the award of late payment charges for findings on the predicate facts for the applicability of N.D.C.C. § 13-01-14. Royal Jewelers, at 527.
- case874 N.W.2d 317Titan Machinery, Inc. v. Patterson Enterprises, Inc.N.D.decided 2016read it at the source ↗
The words that state the rule
The court’s findings, however, did not address late payment charges or the predicate facts for the applicability of N.D.C.C. §§ 13-01-14 and 13-01-15 as a component of damages. We are unable to understand the basis for the court’s decision regarding late payment charges as a component of Patterson’s obligations to Titan. We reverse the judgment and remand for findings addressing this issue.
“Defective” means that reading found something to correct. What you are reading is the rule as it stands after that reading.